Skip to main content
Log in

Springback Predictions of a Dual-phase Steel Considering Elasticity Evolution in Stamping Process

  • Research Article - Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical properties of a dual-phase steel of 0.8 mm thickness are investigated with uniaxial tensile loadings at room temperature. Standard tensile tests are conducted to determine Young’s modulus, flow curves and plastic strain ratios in rolling, transverse and diagonal directions, respectively. Moreover, uniaxial tensile loadings with unloading–reloading cycles are performed to determine the elastic modulus evolution. Anisotropy of DP600 steel is described using isotopic hardening plasticity in junction with Hill’s orthotropic yield function and applied in finite element (FE) stamping analysis of an automotive structural member. In sheet metal deformation modeling, material models with both constant and variable Young’s moduli were considered to assess the effect of stiffness degradation on FE springback predictions. Effective plastic strain and part thickness distributions calculated with both models were fairly similar and maximum differences were determined to be 4 and 6 %, respectively. A similar situation holds for predicted springback distributions, but springback magnitudes calculated with variable modulus model were constantly higher. Computed geometries with both FE models were, furthermore, evaluated with surface scanning of manufactured parts. While stamping geometries predicted with both models underestimate actual shape distortions determined in manufactured parts, calculations with variable modulus have reduced maximum geometric deviation by 20 % and constantly improved shape correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection. Auto/Steel Partnership & American Iron and Steel Institute, Southfield (2004)

  2. Lightweight Rear Chassis Project Report. Auto/Steel Partnership & American Iron and Steel Institute, Southfield (2008)

  3. Mowrtage W.: Low-rise 3D panel structures for hot regions: design guidelines and case studies. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(3), 587–600 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murali, G.; Gopal, M.; Rajadurai, A.: Effect of circular and rectangular drawbeads in hemispherical cup forming: finite element analysis and experimental validation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(6), 1701–1709 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sadagopan, S.; Urban, D.: Formability characterization of a new generation high strength steels. American Iron and Steel Institute, Pittsburgh (2003)

  6. Roll K., Weigand K.: Tendencies and new requirements in the simulation of sheet metal forming processes. Comput. Methods Mater. Sci. 9, 12–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Automotive Steel Design Manual. Auto/Steel Partnership & American Iron and Steel Institute, Southfield (2002)

  8. Haddadi, H.; Bouvier, S.; Levée, P.: Identification of a microstructural model for steels subjected to large tensile and/or simple shear deformations. J. Phys. IV(11), 329–337 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chun, B.K.; Jinn, J.T.; Lee, J.K.: Modeling the Bauschinger effect for sheet metals, part I: theory. Int. J. Plast. 18, 571–595 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sung, J.H.; Kim, J.N.; Wagoner, R.H.: A plastic constitutive equation incorporating strain, strain-rate, and temperature. Int. J. Plast. 26(12), 1746–1771 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Firat, M.: U-channel forming analysis with an emphasis on springback deformation. Mater. Des. 28, 147–154 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wagoner, R.H.; Li, M.: Simulation of springback: through-thickness integration. Int. J. Plast. 23(3), 345–360 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida, F.; Uemori, T.: A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity describing the Bauschinger effect and work hardening stagnation. Int. J. Plast. 18, 661–686 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haddadi, H.; Bouvier, S.; Banu, M.; Maier, C.; Teodosiu, C.: Towards an accurate description of the anisotropic behaviour of sheet metals under large plastic deformations: modelling, numerical analysis and identification. Int. J. Plast. 22, 2226–2271 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM Standard E8-01. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2001)

  16. ASTM Standard E517. Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio r for Sheet Metal. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2010)

  17. Banabic, D.; Bunge, H.J.; Pohlandt, K.; Tekkaya, A.E.: Formability of Metallic Materials, Springer, Berlin (2000)

  18. Hallquist, J.O.: Ls-Dyna Theory Manual. LSTC, Livermore (2006)

  19. Nine H.D.: The applicability of Coulomb’s friction law to drawbeads in sheetmetal forming. J. Appl. Metal Work. 2(3), 200–210 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Firat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozsoy, M., Esener, E., Ercan, S. et al. Springback Predictions of a Dual-phase Steel Considering Elasticity Evolution in Stamping Process. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 3199–3207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0910-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0910-9

Keywords

Navigation