Skip to main content
Log in

The Improvement of Structural Adequacy Against Large Demands of Near-Fault Ground Motions

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Near-fault ground motions impose large demands on structures compared to ordinary ground motions. Recordings suggest that near-fault ground motions with ‘forward’ directivity are characterized by a large pulse, which is mostly orientated perpendicular to the fault. The maximum velocity direction (MVD) component is calculated by finding the angle that the maximum velocity resultant of the original longitudinal and transverse components will be occurred. The MVD component has larger PGV and PGD values compared to other components of near-fault ground motions. The spectral values of the MVD component are an envelope of the other decomposed components. The improvement of structural adequacy against large demands of near-fault ground motions has been the subject of research for the last decade. This study intends to provide quantitative knowledge on the near-fault ground motion demand and corresponding structural capacity requirements. The spectral quantities were computed through an attenuation relationship that is based on the near-fault ground motion records. New findings in this study are compared with the Uniform Building Code provisions and other attenuation relationships. The results demonstrate that for large magnitude events M w  > 7, the UBC97 near-source factors (N a , N v ) have more conservative values compared to the study estimates. Hence, seismic coefficients of UBC97 have serious concern for estimating strength when short distances and large magnitude events are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Somerville PG (1998) Development of an improved representation of near-fault ground motions. In: Proceedings of the SMIP98 seminar on utilization of strong-motion data, Oakland, Canada, pp 1–20

  2. Bertero VV (1996) State of the art report on design criteria. In: Proceedings of 11th world conference of earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  3. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. In: Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand

  4. Iwan WD (1997) Measure of drift spectrum demand for earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng(ASCE) 123: 397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uniform Building Code (1997) Structural engineering design provisions, international conference of building officials. Whittier, California, USA

  6. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (1997) Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures

  7. Chopra AK (2001) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

  8. Shakib H, Ghasemi A (2007) Considering different criteria for minimizing torsional response of asymmetric structures under near-fault and far-fault excitations. Int J Civil Eng 5(4): 247–265

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1976) Correlations of peak acceleration, velocity and displacement with earthquake magnitude, distance and site conditions. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 4(5): 455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Idriss IM (1993) Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites. Technical report to National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST GCR 93-625

  11. Campell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2000) New empirical models for predicting near-source horizontal, vertical, and V/H response spectra. Proc 5th U.S Natl Conf Earthq Eng 3: 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North America earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 128–153

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ambraseys NN, Bommer JJ (1995) Attenuation relations for use in Europe. In: Proceeding of fifth Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering. Conference on European seismic design practice, Chester, England pp 67–74

  14. Chopra AK, Chintinapakde C (2001) Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(1): 1769–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghasemi, A., Shakib, H. The Improvement of Structural Adequacy Against Large Demands of Near-Fault Ground Motions. Arab J Sci Eng 36, 185–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0028-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0028-2

Keywords

Navigation