Abstract
We attempt to identify geographical subdivisions within the range of moose according to antler size for a more correct trophy evaluation in the СIC system (The International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation). Traditionally, this division coincides with subspecific division of trophy animal species. That is why we partially touch upon the problem of the geography of moose subspecies in Eurasia. Catalogs of hunters’ trophies that were available to us served as the research material (1,047 trophies in total). We were choosing the same measurements for moose antlers evaluated by different methods. They are overall spread, circumference of beam, width of palm, and number of tines. We applied multivariate statistic methods to the findings, enlarging the geographical division groups step by step. As a result, we suggest four geographical groups: European, Siberian, the north of the Far East, and the south of the Far East. In principle, this division corresponds to the subspecies: European (Alces alces alces L., 1758), east Siberian (A. a. pfizenmayeri Zukowsky, 1910), Chukotka or Kolyma (A. a. buturlini Chernyavski et. Zhelesnov, 1982), and Ussuri (А. а. cameloides Milne-Edwards, 1867). We consider it incorrect to draw the line between the European and Siberian groups along the river Yenisei. It is more correct to move it to the Urals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowyer RT, Stewart KM, Pierce BM, Hundertmark KJ, Gasaway WC (2002) Geographical variation in antler morphology of Alaskan moose: putative effects of habitat and genetics. Alces 38:155–165
Danilkin AA (2010) Biological basis of the hunting trophy case. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow (In Russian)
Groves D, Grubb P (2011) Ungulate taxonomy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation (1986a) Medal categories for the game animals of the world. Nicolas Franco-Strips Editores, S. A, Madrid
International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation (1986b) The game-trophies of the world. International formula for the measurement and evaluation of trophies. Nicolas Franco-Strips Editores, S. A, Madrid
Kozlovskii IS, Kolesnikov VV (2010) Polozhenie ob ohotnich’ih trofejah v Rossijskoj Federacii. M. (In Russian)
Landete-Castillejos T, Gomez S, Gallego L, Garcia A, Ceacero F (2012) From diagnosing and monitoring deer populations to explaining human osteoporosis: research in composition, mechanics and histology of antlers. Recent problems of nature use, game biology and fur farming: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Russian Research Institute of Game Management and Fur Farming (May 22–25, 2012)/VNIIOZ, RAAS, Kirov
Odum E. 1975. Fundamentals of Ecology. Mir Publishers, Moscow, p 740. (In Russian)
Pavlinov IJ (2006) Sistematika sovremennyh mlekopitajushhih. - M.:Izd-vo MGU (in Russian)
Peterson RL (1952) A review of the living representatives of the genus Alces. Contrib Roy Ont Mus Zool Palaeontol (Toronto) 34:1–30
Saether B-E, Haagenrud H (1985) Geographical variation in the antlers of Norwegian moose in relation to age and size. J Wildl Manag 49:983–986
Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Gasaway WC (2000) Antler size relative to body mass in moose: tradeoffs associated with reproduction. Alces 36:77–83
Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2003) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Kris Hundertmark
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolesnikov, V.V., Kozlovskii, I.S. Geographical variation of antler morphology of moose (Alces alces) in Russia. Acta Theriol 59, 443–448 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0175-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0175-z