Abstract
Accurate global land cover (GLC), as a key input for scientific communities, is important for a wide variety of applications. In order to understand the current suitability and limitation of GLC products, the discrepancy and pixel-level uncertainty in major GLC products in three epochs are assessed in this study by using an integrated uncertainty index (IUI) that combines the thematic uncertainty and local classification accuracy uncertainty. The results show that the overall spatial agreements (Ao values) between GLC products are lower than 58%, and the total areas of forests are very consistent in major GLC products, but significant differences are found in different forest classes. The misclassification among different forest classes and mosaic types can account for about 20% of the total disagreements. The mean IUI almost reaches 0.5, and high uncertainty mostly occurs in transition zones and heterogeneous areas across the world. Further efforts are needed to make in the land cover classifications in areas with high uncertainty. Designing a classification scheme for climate models, with explicit definitions of land cover classes in the threshold of common attributes, is urgently needed. Information of the pixel-level uncertainty in major GLC products not only give important implications for the specific application, but also provide a quite important basis for land cover fusion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlqvist, O., 2005: Using uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 19, 831–857, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500106729.
Bai, Y., M. Feng, H. Jiang, et al., 2014: Assessing consistency of five global land cover data sets in China. Remote Sens., 6, 8739–8759, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6098739.
Bartholome, E., and A. S. Belward, 2005: GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1959–1977, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331291297.
Bicheron, P., P. Defourny, C. Brockmann, et al., 2008: GlobCover: Products description and validation report. MEDIAS-France, Toulouse, 1–16.
Bontemps, S., P. Defourny, E. Van Bogaert, et al., 2011: GLOBCOVER 2009 products description and validation report. European Space Agency, Frascati, Italy, 1–51.
Chen, J., J. Chen, A. P. Liao, et al., 2015: Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: A POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 103, 7–27, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002.
Comber, A. J., 2013: Geographically weighted methods for estimating local surfaces of overall, user and producer accuracies. Remote Sens. Lett., 4, 373–380, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2012.736694.
Comber, A., C. Brunsdon, M. Charlton, et al., 2017: Geographically weighted correspondence matrices for local error reporting and change analyses: Mapping the spatial distribution of errors and change. Remote Sens. Lett., 8, 234–243, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2016.1258126.
Defourny, P., S. Bontemps, L. Schouten, et al., 2011: GLOBCOVER 2005 and GLOBCOVER 2009 Validation: Learnt lessons. Proceedings of GOFC-GOLD Global Land Cover & Change Validation Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria.
Defourny, P., G. Kirches, C. Brockmann, et al., 2016: Land cover CCI: Product user guide version 2. Available online at http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download/ESACCI-LC-PUG-v2.5.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2019.
Findell, K. L., E. Shevliakova, P. C. D. Milly, et al., 2007: Modeled impact of anthropogenic land cover change on climate. J. Climate, 20, 3621–3634, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4185.1.
Foody, G. M., 2002: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ., 80, 185–201, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4.
Foody, G. M., 2005: Local characterization of thematic classification accuracy through spatially constrained confusion matrices. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1217–1228, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331326521.
Friedl, M. A., D. Sulla-Menashe, B. Tan, et al., 2010: Modis Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 168–182, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016.
Fritz, S., and L. See, 2008: Identifying and quantifying uncertainty and spatial disagreement in the comparison of Global Land Cover for different applications. Global Change Biol., 14, 1057–1075, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01519.x.
Fritz, S., I. McCallum, C. Schill, et al., 2009: Geo-Wiki.Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens., 1, 345–354, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1030345.
Gao, H., and G.-S. Jia, 2012: Spatial and quantitative comparison of satellite-derived land cover products over China. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 5, 426–434, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2012.11447026.
Gao, H., and G. S. Jia, 2013: Assessing disagreement and tolerance of misclassification of satellite-derived land cover products used in WRF model applications. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 125–141, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2037-4.
Ge, J. J., J. G. Qi, B. M. Lofgren, et al., 2007: Impacts of land use/cover classification accuracy on regional climate simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, D05107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007404.
Gong, P., J. Wang, L. Yu, et al., 2013: Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 2607–2654, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.748992.
Hansen, M. C., R. S. Defries, J. R. G. Townshend, et al., 2000: Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int. J. Remote Sens., 21, 1331–1364, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210209.
Herold, M., C. E. Woodcock, A. Di Gregorio, et al., 2006: A joint initiative for harmonization and validation of land cover datasets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1719–1727, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.871219.
Herold, M., P. Mayaux, C. E. Woodcock, et al., 2008: Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2538–2556, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.013.
Hua, T., W. W. Zhao, Y. X. Liu, et al., 2018: Spatial consistency assessments for global land-cover datasets: A comparison among GLC2000, CCI LC, MCD12, GLOBCOVER and GLCNMO. Remote Sens., 10, 1846, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111846.
Iwao, K., K. Nishida, T. Kinoshita, et al., 2006: Validating land cover maps with Degree Confluence Project information. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23404, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027768.
Kaptué Tchuenté, A. T., J.-L. Roujean, and S. M. De Jong, 2011: Comparison and relative quality assessment of the GLC2000, GLOBCOVER, MODIS and ECOCLIMAP land cover data sets at the African continental scale. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 13, 207–219, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.11.005.
Madhusoodhanan, C. G., K. G. Sreeja, and T. I. Eldho, 2017: Assessment of uncertainties in global land cover products for hydro-climate modeling in India. Water Resour. Res., 53, 1713–1734, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020193.
Mayaux, P., H. Eva, J. Gallego, et al., 2006: Validation of the global land cover 2000 map. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1728–1739, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.864370.
McCallum, I., M. Obersteiner, S. Nilsson, et al., 2006: A spatial comparison of four satellite derived 1 km global land cover datasets. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 8, 246–255, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2005.12.002.
Nakaegawa, T., 2011: Uncertainty in land cover datasets for global land-surface models derived from 1-km global land cover datasets. Hydrol. Process., 25, 2703–2714, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8011.
Neumann, K., M. Herold, A. Hartley, et al., 2007: Comparative assessment of CORINE2000 and GLC2000: Spatial analysis of land cover data for Europe. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 9, 425–437, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2007.02.004.
Olofsson, P., S. V. Stehman, C. E. Woodcock, et al., 2012: A global land-cover validation data set, part I: Fundamental design principles. Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 5768–5788, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.674230.
Pérez-Hoyos, A., F. J. García-Haro, and J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, 2012: Conventional and fuzzy comparisons of large scale land cover products: Application to CORINE, GLC2000, MODIS and GlobCover in Europe. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 74, 185–201, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.09.006.
Potapov, P., M. C. Hansen, A. M. Gerrand, et al., 2011: The global Landsat imagery database for the FAO FRA remote sensing survey. Int. J. Digit. Earth, 4, 2–21, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2010.492244.
Santos-Alamillos, F. J., D. Pozo-Vázquez, J. A. Ruiz-Arias, et al., 2015: Influence of land-use misrepresentation on the accuracy of WRF wind estimates: Evaluation of GLCC and CORINE land-use maps in southern Spain. Atmos. Res., 157, 17–28, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.006.
Schultz, M., N. E. Tsendbazar, M. Herold, et al., 2015: Utilizing the global land cover 2000 reference dataset for a comparative accuracy assessment of 1 km global land cover maps. Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, ISPRS—The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Berlin, 503–510.
See, L., D. Schepaschenko, M. Lesiv, et al., 2015: Building a hybrid land cover map with crowdsourcing and geographically weighted regression. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 103, 48–56, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.06.016.
Sertel, E., A. Robock, and C. Ormeci, 2010: Impacts of land cover data quality on regional climate simulations. Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1942–1953, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2036.
Sterling, S. M., A. Ducharne, and J. Polcher, 2013: The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle. Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 385–390, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1690.
Tateishi, R., B. Uriyangqai, H. Al-Bilbisi, et al., 2011: Production of global land cover data—GLCNMO. Int. J. Digit. Earth, 4, 22–49, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538941003777521.
Tateishi, R., N. T. Hoan, T. Kobayashi, et al., 2014: Production of global land cover data—GLCNMO2008. J. Geograp. Geol., 6, 99–123, doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v6n3p99.
Tsendbazar, N.-E., S. de Bruin, S. Fritz, et al., 2015: Spatial accuracy assessment and integration of global land cover datasets. Remote Sens., 7, 15,804–15,821, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215804.
Tsendbazar, N. E., S. de Bruin, B. Mora, et al., 2016: Comparative assessment of thematic accuracy of GLC maps for specific applications using existing reference data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 44, 124–135, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.08.009.
Tsutsumida, N., and A. J. Comber, 2015: Measures of spatio-temporal accuracy for time series land cover data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 41, 46–55, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.04.018.
Wickham, J., S. V. Stehman, L. Gass, et al., 2017: Thematic accuracy assessment of the 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Remote Sens. Environ., 191, 328–341, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.026.
Yang, Y. K., P. F. Xiao, X. Z. Feng, et al., 2017: Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 125, 156–173, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.016.
Yu, L., X. X. Liu, Y. Y. Zhao, et al., 2018: Difficult to map regions in 30 m global land cover mapping determined with a common validation dataset. Int. J. Remote Sens., 39, 4077–4087, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1455238.
Zhao, Y. Y., P. Gong, L. Yu, et al., 2014: Towards a common validation sample set for global land-cover mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens., 35, 4795–4814, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.930202.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the international organizations for providing the satellite derived GLC products or reference datasets used in this study, and appreciate all anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0600303 and 2018YFC1506506).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, H., Jia, G. & Fu, Y. Identifying and Quantifying Pixel-Level Uncertainty among Major Satellite Derived Global Land Cover Products. J Meteorol Res 34, 806–821 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9183-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9183-x