Skip to main content
Log in

Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency in Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 January 2015

Abstract

Objective

To assess feasibility and recall rates for newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency in a predominantly rural and inner city population in and around the City of Lucknow in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Two tertiary-care and 5 district hospitals in and around Lucknow.

Participants

All babies born in above hospitals during the study period.

Methods

Heel prick samples were collected after 24 hours of life. Dried blood spot TSH, total galactose and biotinidase were assayed by immunofluorometry. Age related cut-offs were applied for recall for TSH. For galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency, manufacturer-suggested recall cut-offs used initially were modified after analysis of initial data.

Main outcome measure

Recall rate for hypothyroidism, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency.

Results

Screening was carried out for 13426 newborns, 73% of all deliveries. Eighty-five percent of those recalled for confirmatory sampling responded. Using fixed TSH cut off of 20 mIU/L yielded high recall rate of 1.39%, which decreased to 0.84% with use of age-related cut-offs. Mean TSH was higher in males, and in low birth weight and vaginally delivered babies. Eleven babies had congenital hypothyroidism. Recall rates with modified cut-offs for galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency were 0.32% and 0.16%, respectively.

Conclusion

An outreach program for newborn screening can be successfully carried out in similar socio-cultural settings in India. For hypothyroidism, the high recall rate due to early discharge was addressed by age-related cut-offs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Léger J, Olivieri A, Donaldson M, Torresani T, Krude H, van Vliet G, et al. European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology consensus guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:363–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Desai MP, Colaco MP, Ajgaonkar AR, Mahadik CV, Vas FE, Rege C, et al. Neonatal screening for congenital high recall. hypothyroidism in a developing country: problems and strategies. Indian J Pediatr. 1987;54:571–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai MP, Upadhye P, Colaco MP, Mehre M, Naik SP, Vaz FE, et al. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism using the filter paper thyroxine technique. Indian J Med Res. 1994;100:36–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manglik AK, Chatterjee N, Ghosh G. Umbilical cord blood TSH levels in term neonates: a screening tool for congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr. 2005;42:1029–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanghvi U, Diwakar KK. Universal newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:331–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaur G, Srivastav J, Jain S, Chawla D, Chavan BS, Atwal R, et al. Preliminary report on neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a Chandigarh experience. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:969–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta A, Srivastava S, Bhatnagar A. Cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone level–Interpretation in light of perinatal factors. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:32–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashmi, Seth A, Sekhri T, Agarwal A. Effect of perinatal factors on cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone levels. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007;20:59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rama Devi AR, Naushad SM. Newborn screening in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71:157–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Academy of Pediatrics, Rose SR; Section in Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Brown RS; Public Health Committee; Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, Foley T, Kaplowitz PB, Kaye CI, Sundarajan S, et al. Update of newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics. 2006;117:2290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Centre (NNSGRC), 2009 National Newborn Screening Information System. Available from: http://genes-rus. uthscsa.edu. Accessed February 2, 2014.

  12. Lott JA, Sardovia-Iyer M, Speakman KS, Lee KK. Agedependent cutoff values in screening newborns for hypothyroidism. Clin Biochem. 2004;37:791–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rama Devi AR. Newborn screening in India, Experience From Pilot Initiative (ICMR Multicenter Project). Abstract presented at 8th Asia Pacific Regional Meeting of the International Society for Neonatal Screening. New Delhi, September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mathai S. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism- experience from India. Abstract presented at 8th Asia Pacific Regional Meeting of the International Society for Neonatal Screening. New Delhi, September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korada SM, Pearce M, Ward Platt MP, Avis E, Turner S, Wastell H, et al. Difficulties in selecting an appropriate neonatal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) screening threshold. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:169–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Albert BB, Cutfield WS, Webster D, Carll J, Derraik JG, Jefferies C, et al. Etiology of increasing incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in New Zealand from 1993–2010. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3155–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nair PS, Sobhakumar S, Kailas L. Diagnostic reevaluation of children with congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:757–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loeber JG. Neonatal screening in Europe; the situation in 2004. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30:430–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valizadeh M, Mazlomzadeh S, Nicsirat A, Shajari Z. High incidence and recall rate of congenital hypothyroidism in Zanjan Province, a health problem or a study challenge? Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;9:338–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yadav S, Gupta SK, Godbole MM, Jain M, Singh U, Pavithran P, et al. Persistence of severe iodine-deficiency disorders despite universal salt iodization in an iodinedeficient area in northern India. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herbstman J, Apelberg BJ, Witter FR, Panny S, Goldman LR. Maternal, infant, and delivery factors associated with neonatal thyroid hormone status. Thyroid. 2008;18:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Avis E, Turner S, Cheetham T. TSH levels in relation to gestation, birth weight and sex. Horm Res. 2009;72:120–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Slaughter JL, Meinzen-Derr J, Rose SR, Leslie ND, Chandrasekar R, Linard SM, et al. The effects of gestational age and birth weight on false-positive newborn-screening rates. Pediatrics. 2010;126:910–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijayalakshmi Bhatia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopalakrishnan, V., Joshi, K., Phadke, S. et al. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency in Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Pediatr 51, 701–705 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0485-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0485-x

Keywords

Navigation