Skip to main content
Log in

INCLEN diagnostic tool for epilepsy (INDT-EPI) for primary care physicians: Development and validation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new diagnostic instrument for epilepsy — INCLEN Diagnostic Tool for Epilepsy (INDT-EPI) — with evaluation by expert pediatric neurologists.

Study design

Evaluation of diagnostic test.

Setting

Tertiary care pediatric referral centers in India.

Methods

Children aged 2–9 years, enrolled by systematic random sampling at pediatric neurology out-patient clinics of three tertiary care centers were independently evaluated in a blinded manner by primary care physicians trained to administer the test, and by teams of two pediatric neurologists.

Outcomes

A 13-item questionnaire administered by trained primary care physicians (candidate test) and comprehensive subject evaluation by pediatric neurologists (gold standard).

Results

There were 240 children with epilepsy and 274 without epilepsy. The candidate test for epilepsy had sensitivity and specificity of 85.8% and 95.3%; positive and negative predictive values of 94.0% and 88.5%; and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 18.25 and 0.15, respectively.

Conclusion

The INDT-EPI has high validity to identify children with epilepsy when used by primary care physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mani KS, Rangan G, Srinivas HV, Kalyanasundaram S, Narendran S, Reddy AK. The yelandur study: A community-based approach to epilepsy in rural south India-epidemiological aspects. Seizure. 1998;7:281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koul R, Razdan S, Motta A. Prevalence and pattern of epilepsy (Lath/Mirgi/Laran) in rural Kashmir, India. Epilepsia. 1988; 29:116–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Radhakrishnan K, Pandian JD, Santhoshkumar T, Thomas SV, Deetha TD, Sarma PS, et al. Prevalence, knowledge, attitude, and practice of epilepsy in Kerala, south India. Epilepsia. 2000; 41:1027–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sridharan R, Murthy BN. Prevalence and pattern of epilepsy in India. Epilepsia. 1999; 40:631–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu L, Liang B, Chen Q, Long J, Xie J, Wu G, et al. Prevalence of epilepsy in the People’s Republic of China: a systematic review. Epilepsy Res. 2013;105:195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malik MA, Akram RM, Tarar MA, Sultan A. Childhood epilepsy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011; 21:74–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benamer HT, Grosset DG. A systematic review of the epidemiology of epilepsy in Arab countries. Epilepsia. 2009; 50:2301–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Somoza MJ, Forlenza RH, Brussino M, Centurión E. Epidemiological survey of epilepsy in the special school population in the city of Buenos Aires. A comparison with mainstream schools. Neuroepidemiology. 2009; 32:129–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calisir N, Bora I, Irgil E, Boz M. Prevalence of epilepsy in Bursa city center, an urban area of Turkey. Epilepsia. 2006; 47:1691–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chadwick D, Smith D. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy. BMJ. 2002; 324:495–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinthapalli RN. Who should take care of children with epilepsy? BMJ. 2003; 327:1413.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockerell OC, Hart YM, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. The cost of epilepsy in the United Kingdom: an estimation based on the results of two population-based studies. Epilepsy Res. 1994; 18:249–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uldall P, Alving J, Hansen LK, Kibaek M, Buchholt J. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy in children admitted to a tertiary epilepsy centre with paroxysmal events. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:219–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stroink H, van Donselaar CA, Geerts AT, Peters ACB, Brouwer OF, Arts WFM. The accuracy of the diagnosis of paroxysmal events in children. Neurology. 2003; 60:979–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnamoorthy ES, Satishchandra P, Sander JW. Research in epilepsy: development priorities for developing nations. Epilepsia. 2003; 44 Suppl 1:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpio A, Hauser WA. Epilepsy in the developing world. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009; 9:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ILAE Commission Report. The epidemiology of the epilepsies: future directions. Epilepsia. 1997; 38:614–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Placencia M, Sander JW, Shorvon SD, Ellison RH, Cascante SM. Validation of a screening questionnaire for the detection of epileptic seizures in epidemiological studies. Br J Neurol. 1992; 115:783–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bharucha NE, Bharucha EP, Bharucha AE, Bhise AV, Schoenberg BS. Prevalence of epilepsy in the Parsi community of Bombay. Epilepsia. 1988; 29:111–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gourie-Devi M, Gururaj G, Satishchandra P, Subbakrishna DK. Neuro-epidemiological pilot survey of an urban population in a developing country. A study in Bangalore, south India. Neuroepidemiology. 1996; 15:313–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osuntokun BO, Adeuja AO, Nottidge VA, Bademosi O, Olumide A, Ige O, et al. Prevalence of the epilepsies in Nigerian Africans: a community-based study. Epilepsia. 1987; 28:272–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anand K, Jain S, Paul E, Srivastava A, Sahariah SA, Kapoor SK. Development of a validated clinical case definition of generalized tonic-clonic seizures for use by community-based health care providers. Epilepsia. 2005; 46:743–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Das SK, Biswas A, Roy T, Banerjee TK, Mukherjee CS, Raut DK, et al. A random sample survey for prevalence of major neurological disorders in Kolkata. Indian J Med Res. 2006; 124:163–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Banerjee TK, Ray BK, Das SK, Hazra A, Ghosal MK, Chaudhuri A, et al. A longitudinal study of epilepsy in Kolkata, India. Epilepsia. 2010; 51:2384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beghi E, Carpio A, Forsgren L, Hesdorffer DC, Malmgren K, Sander JW, et al. Recommendation for a definition of acute symptomatic seizure. Epilepsia. 2010; 51:671–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendra K. Arora.

Additional information

INCLEN Study Group: Core Group: Alok Thakkar, Arun Singh, Gautam Bir Singh, Manju Mehta, Manoja K Das, Monica Juneja, Nandita Babu, Paul SS Russell, Poma Tudu, Praveen Suman, Rajesh Sagar, Rohit Saxena, Savita Sapra, Sharmila Mukherjee, Sunanda K Reddy, Tanuj Dada, Vinod Bhutani. Extended Group: AK Niswade, Archisman Mohapatra, Arti Maria, Atul Prasad, BC Das, Bhadresh Vyas, GVS Murthy, Gourie M Devi, Harikumaran Nair, JC Gupta, KK Handa, Leena Sumaraj, Madhuri Kulkarni, Muneer Masoodi, Poonam Natrajan, Rashmi Kumar, Rashna Dass, Rema Devi, Sandeep Bavdekar, Santosh Mohanty, Saradha Suresh, Shobha Sharma, Sujatha S Thyagu, Sunil Karande, TD Sharma, Vinod Aggarwal, Zia Chaudhuri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konanki, R., Mishra, D., Gulati, S. et al. INCLEN diagnostic tool for epilepsy (INDT-EPI) for primary care physicians: Development and validation. Indian Pediatr 51, 539–543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0443-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0443-7

Keywords

Navigation