Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients undergoing liver resection for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma and those for viral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma have similar survival outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have compared outcomes of liver resection (LR) of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to those of patients with non-NAFLD-related HCC. However, results have been inconsistent. We aim to clarify this issue. We enrolled 801 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC, 433 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC, and 128 patients with NAFLD-related HCC undergoing LR. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with different etiologies of chronic liver disease was compared using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and log-rank test after propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM, 83 patients remained in each group. The groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, the proportion of patients with pathological American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 1, tumor size > 50 mm, receipt of major resection, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 20 ng/ml, presence of cirrhosis, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. The five-year OS of patients with HBV-, HCV-, and NAFLD-related HCC was 78%, 75%, and 78%, respectively (p = 0.789). The five-year DFS of the HBV, HCV, and NAFLD groups was 60%, 45%, and 54%, respectively (p = 0.159). Perioperative morbidity was noted in 17 (20.5%) in the HBV group, 22 (26.5%) in the HCV group, and 15 (18.1%) in the NAFLD group (p = 0.398). The five-year OS, DFS, and perioperative morbidity of patients undergoing LR for NAFLD-related HCC and those for viral hepatitis-related HCC was similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data is available.

References

  1. Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR (2019) A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:589–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yen YH, Kee KM, Li WF, Liu YW, Wang CC, Hu TH et al (2023) Stationary trend in elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein level in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancers (Basel) 15:1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Younossi ZM, Otgonsuren M, Henry L, Venkatesan C, Mishra A, Erario M et al (2015) Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States from 2004 to 2009. Hepatology 62:1723–1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karim MA, Singal AG, Kum HC, Lee YT, Park S, Rich NE et al (2023) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:670-680.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viganò L, Conci S, Cescon M, Fava C, Capelli P, D’Errico A et al (2015) Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with metabolic syndrome: a multicenter matched analysis with HCV-related HCC. J Hepatol 63:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pais R, Fartoux L, Goumard C, Scatton O, Wendum D, Rosmorduc O, Ratziu V (2017) Temporal trends, clinical patterns and outcomes of NAFLD-related HCC in patients undergoing liver resection over a 20-year period. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 46:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koh YX, Tan HJ, Liew YX, Syn N, Teo JY, Lee SY et al (2019) Liver resection for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 229:467-478.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pal Chaudhary S, Reyes S, Chase ML, Govindan A, Zhao L, Luther J et al (2023) Resection of NAFLD/NASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): clinical features and outcomes compared with HCC due to other etiologies. Oncologist 28:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Conci S, Cipriani F, Donadon M, Marchitelli I, Ardito F, Famularo S, et al, He.RC.O.Le.S Group (2022) Hepatectomy for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) related HCC: propensity case-matched analysis with viral- and alcohol-related HCC. Eur J Surg Oncol 48:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.015.

  10. Grimaudo S, Pipitone RM, Pennisi G, Celsa C, Cammà C, Di Marco V et al (2020) Association between PNPLA3 rs738409 C>G variant and liver-related outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:935-944.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yip TC, Lee HW, Chan WK, Wong GL, Wong VW (2022) Asian perspective on NAFLD-associated HCC. J Hepatol 76:726–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, Abdelmalek MF, Caldwell S, Barb D et al (2023) AASLD practice guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 77:1797–1835. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK et al (2017) The Eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67:93–99. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Everhart JE, Wright EC, Goodman ZD, Dienstag JL, Hoefs JC, Kleiner DE et al (2010) Prognostic value of Ishak fibrosis stage: findings from the hepatitis C antiviral long-term treatment against cirrhosis trial. Hepatology 51:585–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bryer J (2017) TriMatch: propensity score matching of non-binary treatments. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TriMatch/

  16. Andrade C (2020) Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry 81:20f13681. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC (2000) A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31:864–871. https://doi.org/10.1053/he.2000.5852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Doyle DJ, Hendrix JM, Garmon EH (2024) American society of anesthesiologists classification. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, 17 Aug 2023

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, Sanyal A, Neuschwander-Tetri B, Tiribelli C et al (2020) MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 158:1999–2014. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312.e1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Caldwell SH, Crespo DM (2004) The spectrum expanded: cryptogenic cirrhosis and the natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 40:578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2004.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Browning JD, Kumar KS, Saboorian MH, Thiele DL (2004) Ethnic differences in the prevalence of cryptogenic cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2004.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Yang HI, Yeh ML, Le MH, Le AK, Yeo YH et al (2021) Association between fatty liver and cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B. J Infect Dis 224:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen HM, Ong CN (1996) Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and ras oncogenes in aflatoxin hepatocarcinogenesis. Mutat Res 366:23–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1110(96)90005-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ng AWT, Poon SL, Huang MN, Lim JQ, Boot A, Yu W et al (2017) Aristolochic acids and their derivatives are widely implicated in liver cancers in Taiwan and throughout Asia. Sci Transl Med 9:eaan6446. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wild CP, Miller JD, Groopman JD (2015) Mycotoxin control in low- and middle-income countries. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gouas D, Shi H, Hainaut P (2009) The aflatoxin-induced TP53 mutation at codon 249 (R249S): biomarker of exposure, early detection and target for therapy. Cancer Lett 286:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2009.02.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for providing HCC registry data. The authors also thank Chih-Yun Lin, Nien-Tzu Hsu, and the Biostatistics Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for statistical analyses. This study was supported by Grant CMRPG8L0181 from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Taiwan. There were no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by Grant CMRPG8L0181 from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Y-HY, C-CW. Acquisition of data: all authors Analysis and interpretation of data: C-YL. Drafting of manuscript: F-YK. Critical revision of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi-Hao Yen or Chih-Chi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose for all authors.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study (Reference number: 202000398B0) and waived the need for informed consent.

Human and animal rights, informed consent

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study (Reference number: 202000398B0) and waived the need for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yen, YH., Kuo, FY., Eng, HL. et al. Patients undergoing liver resection for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma and those for viral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma have similar survival outcomes. Updates Surg 76, 879–887 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01833-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01833-3

Keywords

Navigation