Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, low rectal anastomoses for rectal cancer still carry a not negligible incidence of anastomotic leakage and pelvic related morbidity. The Turnball-Cutait delayed colo-anal anastomosis, also referred as pull-through procedure was introduced with the aim to reduce the surgical anastomotic related complications and overcome the need of diverting ileostomy creation. Recently, this technique regained popularity as a viable option not only as salvage procedure after anastomotic failure or in case of hostile pelvis but also as first choice option in case of low rectal cancer. We report our experience with a personal technique for delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis and its combination with a minimally invasive approach in order to reduce surgical morbidity, avoid the need for stoma creation and minimize the impact of surgery. Between 2011 and 2015, eight consecutive patients were operated for low rectal cancer by the described technique by a minimally invasive approach. The procedure was successfully completed in all cases. Post-operative major morbidity and 60 days mortality were nihil. There was no need for stoma creation or service laparotomy resulting in a virtually “scarless” surgery. Mean cumulative hospital stay (combining the two stages of the procedure) was 7, 6 days (range 7–9). The proposed technique by combining the advantage of a minimally invasive approach to those of a delayed “high” colo-anal anastomoses can be considered a viable option for the surgical treatment of low rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, COLOR II Study Group et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR et al (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turnbull RJ, Cuthbertson F (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for rectal cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianco F, De Franciscis S, Belli A, Ragone V, Romano GM (2015) A pull-through delayed “high” coloanal anastomosis: new tricks to refresh an old procedure. Tech Coloproctol 19(4):259–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P et al (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiranyakas A, Ho Y-H (2011) Laparoscopic ultralow anteriorn resection versus laparoscopic pull-through with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers: a comparative study. Am J Surg 202:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP et al (2009) Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96:424–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallet J, Milot H, Drolet S et al (2014) The clinical results of the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 18(6):579–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olagne E, Baulieux J, de la Roche E et al (2000) Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 191:643–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarry J, Faucheron L, Moreno W et al (2011) Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas. Eur Surg Oncol 37:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Belli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki declaration (as revised in Tokyo 2004).

Informed consent

No study advertising was made and no remuneration was offered.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bianco, F., Belli, A., De Franciscis, S. et al. “Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis. Updates Surg 68, 99–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0358-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0358-z

Keywords

Navigation