Skip to main content
Log in

Linac reported steering error insensitive to 6 MV FFF transverse beam position deviations

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinically significant beam position deviations were observed for a 6 MV FFF beam during patient specific QA on an Elekta linear accelerator. There was no significant reported transverse steering error from the machine ion chamber, and routine linac QA practices, including cardinal angle Winston-Lutz test, did not identify the deviations. Subsequent investigation using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) revealed clinically significant beam position deviations for small steering errors. This prompted investigation into further impact and possible solutions. Testing set-points were established by adjusting transverse steering current to achieve introduced 2 T steering errors. Tests at each set-point included scanning water tank profiles and EPID images. A proposed method for adjusting the 2 T error sensitivity was tested via adjusting the 2 T loop parameter such that a reported error corresponds to specific beam position deviations. The testing set-points resulted in positional deviations of greater than 3 mm for reported errors of less than 1. A new method for improving 2 T error sensitivity was implemented. This work has shown that existing vendor protocol for establishing beam steering error for 6 MV FFF beams can lead to beam position deviations without machine interlocks or significant reported steering errors. Thus, an alternative method of establishing steering error sensitivity based on positional deviations is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data availability

N/A.

Code availability

N/A.

References

  1. AAPM TG-101 (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AAPM-RSS 9.a (2017) Medical physics practice guideline 9a. for SRS-SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18(5):10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Budgell G, Brown K, Cashmore J, Duane S, Frame J, Hardy M, . . . Thomas,R (2016). IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 61(23), 8360

  4. Xiao Y, Kry SF, Popple R, Yorke E, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S, . . . Yin F-F (2015). Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(3), 12–29

  5. Marino C, Garibaldi C, Veronese I, Carbonini C, Russo S, Stasi M, Mancosu P (2019) A national survey on technology and quality assurance for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Physica Med 65:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fogliata A, Fleckenstein J, Schneider F, Pachoud M, Ghandour S, Krauss H, . . . Cozzi L (2016) Flattening filter free beams from TrueBeam and Versa HD units: evaluation of the parameters for quality assurance. Med Phys 43(1), 205–212

  7. Paynter D, Weston SJ, Cosgrove VP, Thwaites DI (2017) Characterisation of flattening filter free (FFF) beam properties for initial beam set-up and routine QA, independent of flattened beams. Phys Med Biol 63(1):015021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paynter DJ (2019) Unflattened Radiotherapy beams; characterisation, optimisation and application. The University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pönisch F, Titt U, Vassiliev ON, Kry FS, Mohan R (2006) Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator. Med Phys 33(6):1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georg D, Kragl G, Af Wetterstedt S, McCavana P, McClean B, Knöös T (2010) Photon beam quality variations of a flattening filter free linear accelerator. Med Phys 37(1):49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clivio, A., Francesca, M., Cozzi, L., Nicolini, G., Vanetti, E., Bolard, G., . . . Fogliata, A. (2014). On the determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free photon beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 41(2), 021713

  12. Kragl, G., Af Wetterstedt, S., Knausl, B., Lind, M., McCavana, P., Knoos, T., . . . Georg, D. (2009). Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10 MV unflattened photon beams. Radiother Oncol 93(1): 141–146

  13. Yan Y, Yadav P, Bassetti M, Du K, Saenz D, Harari P, Paliwal BR (2016) Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans. J Med Phys 41(2):92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chojnowski JM, Sykes JR, Thwaites DI (2021) Towards zero radiation isocentre size: minimising radiation beam isocentricity on Elekta linear accelerators by means of optimising look-up tables. Phys Eng Sci Med 14:1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

N/A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob McAloney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

N/A.

Consent to participate

N/A.

Consent for publication

All authors involved consent to publish work here within.

Ethical approval

N/A.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McAloney, J., Biggs, S. & Sobolewski, M. Linac reported steering error insensitive to 6 MV FFF transverse beam position deviations. Phys Eng Sci Med 44, 1377–1382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01067-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01067-2

Keywords

Navigation