Abstract
Clinically significant beam position deviations were observed for a 6 MV FFF beam during patient specific QA on an Elekta linear accelerator. There was no significant reported transverse steering error from the machine ion chamber, and routine linac QA practices, including cardinal angle Winston-Lutz test, did not identify the deviations. Subsequent investigation using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) revealed clinically significant beam position deviations for small steering errors. This prompted investigation into further impact and possible solutions. Testing set-points were established by adjusting transverse steering current to achieve introduced 2 T steering errors. Tests at each set-point included scanning water tank profiles and EPID images. A proposed method for adjusting the 2 T error sensitivity was tested via adjusting the 2 T loop parameter such that a reported error corresponds to specific beam position deviations. The testing set-points resulted in positional deviations of greater than 3 mm for reported errors of less than 1. A new method for improving 2 T error sensitivity was implemented. This work has shown that existing vendor protocol for establishing beam steering error for 6 MV FFF beams can lead to beam position deviations without machine interlocks or significant reported steering errors. Thus, an alternative method of establishing steering error sensitivity based on positional deviations is presented.
Data availability
N/A.
Code availability
N/A.
References
AAPM TG-101 (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101
AAPM-RSS 9.a (2017) Medical physics practice guideline 9a. for SRS-SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18(5):10–21
Budgell G, Brown K, Cashmore J, Duane S, Frame J, Hardy M, . . . Thomas,R (2016). IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 61(23), 8360
Xiao Y, Kry SF, Popple R, Yorke E, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S, . . . Yin F-F (2015). Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(3), 12–29
Marino C, Garibaldi C, Veronese I, Carbonini C, Russo S, Stasi M, Mancosu P (2019) A national survey on technology and quality assurance for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Physica Med 65:6–14
Fogliata A, Fleckenstein J, Schneider F, Pachoud M, Ghandour S, Krauss H, . . . Cozzi L (2016) Flattening filter free beams from TrueBeam and Versa HD units: evaluation of the parameters for quality assurance. Med Phys 43(1), 205–212
Paynter D, Weston SJ, Cosgrove VP, Thwaites DI (2017) Characterisation of flattening filter free (FFF) beam properties for initial beam set-up and routine QA, independent of flattened beams. Phys Med Biol 63(1):015021
Paynter DJ (2019) Unflattened Radiotherapy beams; characterisation, optimisation and application. The University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds
Pönisch F, Titt U, Vassiliev ON, Kry FS, Mohan R (2006) Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator. Med Phys 33(6):1738–1746
Georg D, Kragl G, Af Wetterstedt S, McCavana P, McClean B, Knöös T (2010) Photon beam quality variations of a flattening filter free linear accelerator. Med Phys 37(1):49–53
Clivio, A., Francesca, M., Cozzi, L., Nicolini, G., Vanetti, E., Bolard, G., . . . Fogliata, A. (2014). On the determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free photon beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 41(2), 021713
Kragl, G., Af Wetterstedt, S., Knausl, B., Lind, M., McCavana, P., Knoos, T., . . . Georg, D. (2009). Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10 MV unflattened photon beams. Radiother Oncol 93(1): 141–146
Yan Y, Yadav P, Bassetti M, Du K, Saenz D, Harari P, Paliwal BR (2016) Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans. J Med Phys 41(2):92
Chojnowski JM, Sykes JR, Thwaites DI (2021) Towards zero radiation isocentre size: minimising radiation beam isocentricity on Elekta linear accelerators by means of optimising look-up tables. Phys Eng Sci Med 14:1–7
Funding
N/A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
N/A.
Consent to participate
N/A.
Consent for publication
All authors involved consent to publish work here within.
Ethical approval
N/A.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAloney, J., Biggs, S. & Sobolewski, M. Linac reported steering error insensitive to 6 MV FFF transverse beam position deviations. Phys Eng Sci Med 44, 1377–1382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01067-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01067-2