Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A technique for calibrating a high dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reference air kerma rate of an 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source is determined based broadly on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) TECDOC 1274 code of practice. Since the primary standards dosimetry laboratory at the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) does not maintain a standard at 192Ir quality, the air kerma calibration coefficient of an IBA FC65-G Farmer type ionisation chamber is calculated using coefficients determined at 300 kV and 60Co qualities. The methodology proposed by Mainegra-Hing and Rogers [1] at 250 kV and 137Cs qualities is used. The validity of this approach is tested by performing Monte Carlo simulations to determine the chamber’s air kerma calibration coefficient at 192Ir quality. Very good agreement is obtained between values using these two methods. The reference air kerma rate is measured using the Farmer chamber in an in air jig. In addition the necessary correction factors are applied to the measured value. The reference air kerma rate determined in this way is compared to the value stated by the vendor of the 192Ir source on the source calibration certificate. Differences are with one exception less than 1%. It is concluded that because of the agreement between the values from the methodology used in this study and the source calibration certificate values this methodology can be used clinically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Schweda M, Personal communication, 2007.

  2. Hovenkamp E, Personal communication, 2010.

References

  1. Mainegra-Hing E, Rogers DWO (2006) On the accuracy of techniques for obtaining the calibration coefficient N K of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources. Med Phys 33:3340–3347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, Palta JA, Purdy L, Reinstein E, Svensson GK, Weller M, Wingfield L (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40. Med Phys 21:581–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Atomic Energy Agency (2002) Calibration of photon and beta ray sources used in brachytherapy. Guidelines on standardized procedures at secondary standards dosimetry laboratories (SSDLs) and hospitals. IAEA-TECDOC-1274, Vienna

  4. International Commission On Radiation Units And Measurements (1985) Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynaecology, ICRU report 38. ICRU Publications, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, Mitch MG, Nath R, Williamson WF (2004) Update of AAPM task group no. 43 report: a revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys 31:633–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goetsch SJ, Attix FH, Pearson DW, Thomadsen BR (1991) Calibration of 192Ir high-dose-rate afterloading systems. Med Phys 18:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Podgorsak MB (1993) Radiation parameters of high dose rate iridium 192 sources. Thesis, University of Wisconsin

  8. Drugge N (1995) Determination of the reference air kerma rate for clinical 192Ir sources. Thesis, University of Göteborg

  9. Firestone RB, Ekström LP (1999) WWW table of radioactive isotopes. LBNL Isotopes Project: LUNDS Universitet. http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nucSearch.asp

  10. Douysset G, Gouriou J, Delauny F, DeWerd L, Stump K, Micka J (2005) Comparison of dosimetric standards of USA and France for HDR brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 50:1961–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler D, Haworth A, Sander T, Todd S (2008) Comparison of 192Ir air kerma calibration coefficients derived at ARPANSA using the interpolation method and at the National Physical Laboratory using a direct measurement. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 31:332–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bielajew AF (1990) Correction factors for thick-walled ionization chambers in point source photon beams. Phys Med Biol 35:501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berg M, Noerrevang O (2004) Recombination factors for the cylindrical FC65-G ionization chamber in pulsed photon beams and the plane-parallel Roos ionization chamber in pulsed electron beams. Phys Med Biol 49:5309–5318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler D, Oliver C (2005) Calibration report on a therapy ionization chamber. ARPANSA Calibration Report No CAL00166/02, Melbourne

  15. Rogers DWO et al (2005) BEAMnrc. National Research Council of Canada. http://irs.inms.nrc.ca/software/beamnrc/

  16. Buckley LA, Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO (2003) An EGSnrc investigation of cavity theory for ion chambers measuring air kerma. Med Phys 30:1211–1218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borg J, Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO, Seuntjens JP (2000) Monte Carlo study of correction factors for Spencer–Attix cavity theory at photon energies at or above 100 keV. Med Phys 27:1804–1813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. International Atomic Energy Agency (1997) Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams. An international code of practice, 2nd edn. Technical Report Series No. 277, Vienna

  19. Rogers DWO (1992) Fundamentals of high energy X-ray and electron dosimetry protocols. In: Purdy JA (ed) Advances in radiation oncology physics. AAPM, New York, pp 181–223

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borg J, Rogers DWO (1999) Spectra and air-kerma strength for encapsulated 192Ir sources. Med Phys 26:2441–2444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Büermann L, Kramer H-M, Schrader H, Selbach H-J (1994) Activity determination of 192Ir solid sources by ionization chamber measurements using calculated corrections for self-absorption. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A339:369–376

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Aleksandra Kazi, Sylwia Zawlodzka-Bednarz and Guy Godwin for making the source calibration measurements and John Simpson for discussion on aspects of the Monte Carlo calculations. They also wish to thank Anne McNeale from Nucletron Pty. Limited for obtaining information on the Mallinckrodt Medical B. V. source calibration procedure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Physics Department (IMB 4), Townsville Hospital, P.O. Box 670, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia

    O. L. Fourie & T. G. Crabtree

Authors
  1. O. L. Fourie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. G. Crabtree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. L. Fourie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fourie, O.L., Crabtree, T.G. A technique for calibrating a high dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 85–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-011-0120-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-011-0120-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation