Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Starch Microstructure and Starch Hydrolysis in Barley and Oat Tempe During In Vitro Digestion

  • Published:
Food Digestion

Abstract

Various botanical and structural characteristics of starchy foods are considered to modify the rate of starch digestion and the glycaemic responses in humans. The main objective of the study was to examine the impact of fermented barley and oat microstructure on the rate of in vitro starch hydrolysis. A dynamic gastrointestinal model was used to estimate the degree of starch hydrolysis during in vitro digestion of fermented whole grain cereal meals. Light microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to study the microstructural changes. In parallel to the in vitro studies, the impact of fermented barley and oats on postprandial plasma glucose responses was evaluated in a human study. Micrographs were taken during in vitro digestion experiments with fermented whole grains and compared with micrographs of boiled barley (undigested). Images showed that most of the oat starch granules were degraded after 120 min of digestion, whereas barley starch granules were less degraded, even after 180 min of digestion. The findings were confirmed by faster starch hydrolysis from the fermented oat meal, measured as maltose generated during in vitro digestion. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from the plotted maltose curves of the meals. AUC for barley tempe (266 ± 33) was 40 % of the AUC for oat tempe (663 ± 8) and significantly different (p < 0.007) from AUC oat tempe. The in vitro data closely resembled the AUCs for plasma glucose from the parallel human study. In terms of glucose response, the mean AUC for barley tempe was 46 % of the AUC for oat tempe in the human study. The agreement between the in vitro and in vivo data indicates the potential of the in vitro method as a tool to predict the rate of starch degradation of cereal products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson JW, Baird P, Davis RH, Ferreri S, Knudtson M, Koraym A, Waters V, Williams CL (2009) Health benefit of dietary fibre. Nutr Rev 67(4):188–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barcaly A, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J, Flood M, Prvan T, Mitchell P, Brand-Miller JC (2008) Gycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk—a meta anlysis of obesrvational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87:627–637

    Google Scholar 

  3. Behall KM, Scholfield DJ, Hallfrisch J (2004) Lipids significantly reduced by diets containing barley in moderately hypercholesterolemic men. J Am Coll Nutr 23:55–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liljeberg H, Björck I (1994) Bioavailability of starch in bread products—postprandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy-subjects and in-vitro resistant starch content. Eur J Clin Nutr 48:151–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fredriksson H, Silverio J, Andersson R, Eliasson AC, Aman P (1998) The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatinization and retrogradation properties of different starches. Carbohydr Polym 35:119–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Behall KM, Hallfrisch J (2002) Plasma glucose and insulin reduction after consumption of breads varying in amylose content. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:913–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Augustin LSA, Franceschi S, Hamidi M, Marchie A et al (2002) Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 76:266S–273S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Östman E, Rossi E, Larsson H, Brighenti F, Björk I (2006) Glucose and insulin responses in healthy men to barley bread with different levels of (1→3;1→4)-β-glucans; predictions using fluidity measurements of in vitro enzyme digests. J Cereal Sci 43(2):230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hallström E, Sestil F, Lafiandra D, Björk I, Östman E (2011) A novel wheat variety with elevated content of amylose increases resistant starch formation and may beneficially influence glycaemia in health subjects. Food Nutr Res 55:7074. doi:10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7074

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong JMW, de Souza R, Kendall CWC, Emam A, Jenkins DJA (2006) Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Autio K, Salmenkallio-Marttila M (2001) Light microscopic investigations of cereal grains, doughs and breads. LWT - Food Sci Technol 34:18–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Achi OK (2005) The potential for upgrading traditional fermented foods through biotechnology. Afr J Biotechnol 4:375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hachmeister KA, Fung DYC (1993) Tempeh: a mold-modified indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains. Crit Rev Microbiol 19(3):137–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Östman EM, Elmståhl HGML, Björck IME (2002) Barley bread containing lactic acid improves glucose tolerance at a subsequent meal in healthy men and women. J Nutr 132:1173–1175

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alminger M, Eklund-Jonsson C (2008) Whole-grain cereal products based on a high fibre barley or oat genotype lower post-prandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy humans. Eur J Nutr 47(6):294–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajithkumar A, Andersson R, Christerson T, Åman P (2005) Amylose and ß-glucan content of new waxy barleys. Starch-Starke 57:235–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng XM, Eriksson ARB, Schnurer J (2005) Growth of lactic acid bacteria and Rhizopus oligosporus during barley tempeh fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 104:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eklund-Jonsson C, Sandberg A-S, Larsson Alminger M (2006) Reduction of phytate content while preserving minerals during whole grain cereal tempe fermentation. J Cereal Sci 44:154–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R, Huis in’t Veld JHJ (1995) A multicompartimental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. ATLA 23:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  20. Minekus M (1998) Development and validation of a dynamic model of the gastrointestinal tract. Doctoral thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, Elinkwijk b.v. Utrecht

  21. Haraldsson A-K, Rimsten L, Alminger M, Andersson R, Åman P, Sandberg A-S (2005) Digestion of barley malt porridges in a gastrointestinal model: Iron dialysability, iron uptake by Caco-2 cells and degradation of [beta]-glucan. J Cereal Sci 42:243–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Butt MS, Tahir-Nadeem M, Khan MK, Shabir R, Butt MS (2008) Oat: unique among the cereals. Eur J Nutr 47:68–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersson AAM, Andersson R, Autio K, Åman P (1999) Chemical composition and microstructure of two naked waxy barleys. J Cereal Sci 30:183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oscarsson M, Parkkonen T, Autio K, Åman P (1997) Composition and microstructure of waxy, normal and high amylose barley samples. J Cereal Sci 26:259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L (2010) Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:168–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shamekh S, Forssell P, Suortti T, Autio K, Poutanen K (1999) Fragmentation of oat and barley starch granules during heating. J Cereal Sci 30:173–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tester RF, Karkalas J (1996) Swelling and gelatinization of oat starches. Cereal Chem 73:271–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou X, Kaplan ML (1997) Soluble amylose cornstarch is more digestible than soluble amylopectin potato starch in rats. J Nutr 127:1349–1356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang G, Hamaker BR (2009) Slowly digestible starch: concept, mechanism, and proposed extended glycemic index. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 49:852–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leeman AM, Karlsson ME, Eliasson A-C, Björk IME (2006) Resistant starch formation in temperature treated potato starches varying in amylose/amylopectin ratio. Carbohydr Polym 65:306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou M, Robards K, Glennie-Holmes M, Helliwell S (1999) Oat lipids. J Am Oil Chem Soc 76(2):159–169

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heaton KW, Marcus SN, Emmett PM, Bolton CH (1988) Particle size of wheat, maize, and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. Am J Clin Nutr 47:675–682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jenkins PJ, Donald AM (1995) The influence of amylose on starch granule structure. Int J Biol Macromol 17:315–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brewer LR, Cai L, Yong-Cheng S (2012) Mechanism and enzymatic contribution to in vitro test method of digestion for maize starches differing in amylose content. J Agric Food Chem 60. doi:10.1021/jf300393m

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ingmar Börjesson and Lena Rimsten at Lantmännen Food R&D are acknowledged for performing tempe fermentations and Rickard Jonsson and Therese Christerson at Svalöv Weibull AB for providing the different cultivars and expertise knowledge. This work was partly financed by VINNOVA Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (Dnr 2004-02301).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maud Langton

    Present address: Department of Food Science, SLU—Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7051, 756 45, Uppsala, Sweden

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Food Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Marie Larsson Alminger & Charlotte Eklund-Jonsson

  2. SIK, P.O. Box 5401, 402 29, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Siv Kidman & Maud Langton

Authors
  1. Marie Larsson Alminger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charlotte Eklund-Jonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siv Kidman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maud Langton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Larsson Alminger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alminger, M.L., Eklund-Jonsson, C., Kidman, S. et al. Starch Microstructure and Starch Hydrolysis in Barley and Oat Tempe During In Vitro Digestion. Food Dig. 3, 53–62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13228-012-0027-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13228-012-0027-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation