Abstract
Objectives
The study was carried out to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and Pregnancy outcome in anti-HCV-positives pregnant women admitted for delivery in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology of Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot between January 2010 and January 2013.
Setting
Department of obstetrics and Gynaecology of GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot.
Material and Methods
A case–control study design was selected for the study. A total of 1412 pregnant women presenting in the labor room of our hospital between January 2010 and January 2013 were subjected to anti-HCV testing by third generation ELISA. Age, parity, and gestational age-matched controls were taken from the women delivering during the same time frame who tested negative for hepatitis C. All the subjects and controls were non-reactive for HIV and HBsAg as well. Risk factors and pregnancy outcome were compared with the control group. Approval was taken from ethic committee of the institute. The women who consented to participate in the study were evaluated on the basis of a questionnaire for the presence of risk factors of hepatitis C and pregnancy outcome. Women with the known previous liver disease were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 16.0. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Forty patients tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies among 1,412 patients subjected to anti-HCV testing during study period. 40 patients were taken as controls, who were negative for anti-HCV antibodies. Prevalence of HCV during pregnancy was 2.8 % in our study. Among the risk factors studied, previous surgery and blood transfusion were the statistically significant risk factors. There was history of previous major surgery in 16 cases versus 4 controls and was statistically significant (p value 0.002) at p < 0.05. History of blood transfusion was present in 4 versus 2 among cases and controls, respectively, and statistically significant (p value 0.004) at p < 0.05. Sexual transmission was not the risk factor as none of the spouse of the pregnant women was positive for HCV antibodies. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Pregnancy complications i.e., Pregnancy-induced hypertension and antepartum hemorrhage were significantly higher in study group compared to control group.
Conclusion
Incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in pregnancy is 2.8 %. Surgical procedures, blood transfusion, are the major risk factors for transmission. There are no identifiable risk factors in 35 % of cases. Pregnancy complications like Pregnancy-induced hypertension and antepartum hemorrhage are more common in HCV-positive mothers. Neonatal outcome is not affected. Universal screening of all pregnant women should be done for HCV as many patients may not have any risk factor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldo V, Baldovin T, Trivello R, et al. Epidemiology of HCV infection. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:1646–54.
Ward C, Tudor-Williams G, Cotzias T, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C among pregnant women attending an inner London obstetric department: uptake and acceptability of named antenatal testing. Gut. 2000;47(2):277–80.
Silverman NS, Jenkin BK, Wu C, et al. Hepatitis C virus in pregnancy: seroprevalence and risk factors for infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:583–7.
Kumar A, Sharma KA, Gupta RK. Prevalence & risk factors for hepatitis C virus among pregnant women. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126:211–5.
Conte D, Fraquelli M, Prati D, et al. Prevalence and clinical course of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and rate of vertocle transmission in a cohort of 15,250 pregnant women. Hepatology. 2000;31:751–5.
ACOG Educational Bulletin. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Number 248, July 1998. American college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998;63:195–202.
Jaffery T, Tariq N, Ayub R, et al. Frequency of hepatitis C in pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15:716–79.
Jabeen T, Cannon B, Hogan J, et al. Pregnancy and pregnancy outcome in hepatitis C type 1b. QJM. 2000;93:597–601.
Awan NS, Asraf N, Nayyar S. Obstetrics and perinatal outcome; risk factors for hepatitis B and C transmission. Professional Medical J. 2006;13(4):511–6.
Faridulla Salih M, Malik IA, Hussain I. Increasing prevalence of chronic hepatitis and associated risk factors. Pak J Med Res. 2002;41:46–50.
Champion JK, Taylor A, Hutchinson S, et al. Incidence of hepatitis C virus infection and associated risk factors among Scottish prison inmates: a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:514–9.
Pergam SA, Wang CC, Gardella CM, et al. Pregnancy complications associated with hepatitis C: data from a 2003–2005 Washington state birth cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):38.el–38.e9.
Marti C, Pena JM, Bates I, et al. Obstetric and perinatal complications in HIV—infected women. Analysis of cohort of 167 pregnancies between 1997 and 2003. Acta Ostet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):409–15.
Peternoster DM, Santarossa C, Grella P, et al. Viral load in HCV RNA—positive pregnant women. Am J Gastroentrol. 2001;96(9):2751–4.
Prasad MR, Honegger JR. Hepatitis C virus in pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:149–59.
Compliance with ethical requirements and Conflict of interest
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. An ethical clearance has also been taken from the institutional ethical committee.
The authors of the article Lajya Devi Goyal, Sharanjit Kaur, Neerja Jindal and Harpreet Kaur declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goyal, L.D., Kaur, S., Jindal, N. et al. HCV and Pregnancy: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Pregnancy Outcome in North Indian Population: A Case–Control Study. J Obstet Gynecol India 64, 332–336 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0548-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0548-x