Skip to main content
Log in

A Database Perspective on Consuming Linked Data on the Web

  • Schwerpunktbeitrag
  • Published:
Datenbank-Spektrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During recent years an increasing number of data providers adopted the Linked Data principles for publishing and connecting structured data on the Web, thus creating a globally distributed dataspace—the Web of Data. While the execution of structured, SQL-like queries over this dataspace opens possibilities not conceivable before, query execution on the Web of Data poses novel challenges. These challenges provide great opportunities for the database community.

In this article we introduce the concept of Linked Data and discuss different approaches to query the Web of Data. Our goal is to provide a general understanding of this new research area and of the challenges and open issues that must be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For current statistics we refer to the Wiki of the Semantic Web Interest Group at http://esw.w3.org/topic/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets/Statistics.

  2. http://www.bbc.co.uk/music.

References

  1. Abadi DJ, Marcus A, Madden SR, Hollenbach K (2009) Sw-store: a vertically partitioned dbms for semantic web data management. VLDB J 18(2):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander K, Cyganiak R, Hausenblas M, Zhao J (2009) Describing linked datasets. In Proceedings of the 2nd linked data on the web workshop (LDOW) at WWW

  3. Berners-Lee T Design issues: linked data. Online at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

  4. Berners-Lee T, Chen Y, Chilton L, Connolly D, Dhanaraj R, Hollenbach J, Lerer A, Sheets D (2006) Tabulator: exploring and analyzing linked data on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 3rd semantic web user interaction workshop (SWUI) at ISWC, Nov. 2006

  5. Berners-Lee T, Fielding R, Masinter L (2005) Uniform resource identifier (URI): Generic syntax. RFC 3986

  6. Bizer C, Heath T, Ayers D, Raymond Y (2007) Linking open data. In Proceedings of the poster session at the 4th European semantic web conference

  7. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data—the story so far. Int J Sem Web Inform Syst 5(3):1–22. Special issue on linked data

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bouquet P, Ghidini C, Serafini L (2009) Querying the web of data: a formal approach. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian semantic web conference (ASWC)

  9. Brickley D, Guha RV (2004) RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. W3C Recommendation, Feb. 2004. Online at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

  10. Carroll JJ, Bizer C, Hayes PJ, Stickler P (2005) Named graphs. J Web Sem 3(4):247–267

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chaudhuri S, Dayal U (1997) An overview of data warehousing and olap technology. SIGMOD Rec 26(1):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng G, Qu Y (2009) Searching linked objects with falcons: approach, implementation and evaluation. Int J Sem Web Inform Syst 5(3):49–70. Special issue on linked data

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fielding R, Gettys J, Mogul J, Frystyk H, Masinter L, Leach P, Berners-Lee T (1999) Hypertext transfer protocol—HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616

  14. Hartig O, Bizer C, Freytag J-C (2009) Executing SPARQL queries over the web of linked data. In Proceedings of the 8th International semantic web conference (ISWC), Nov. 2009

  15. Hartig O, Mühleisen H, Freytag J-C (2009) Linked data for building a map of researchers. In Proceedings of 5th workshop on scripting and development for the semantic web (SFSW) at ESWC, June 2009

  16. Heath T (2008) How will we interact with the web of data? IEEE Internet Comput 12(5):88–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klyne G, Carroll JJ (2004) Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, Feb. 2004. Online at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

  18. Kobilarov G, Scott T, Raimond Y, Oliver S, Sizemore C, Smethurst M, Bizer C, Lee R (2009) Media meets semantic web—how the bbc uses dbpedia and linked data to make connections. In Proceedings of the 6th European semantic web conference (ESWC), June 2009

  19. Kossmann D (2000) The state of the art in distributed query processing. ACM Comput Surv 32(4):422–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langegger A (2010) A flexible architecture for virtual information integration based on semantic web concepts. Dissertation, J. Kepler University Linz, January 2010

  21. Langegger A, WößW (2009) RDFStats—an extensible rdf statistics generator and library. In Proceedings of the international workshop on database and expert systems applications (DEXA)

  22. Mendelzon AO, Milo T (1998) Formal models of web queries. Inform Syst 23(8):615–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neumann T, Weikum G (2008) Rdf-3x: a risc-style engine for rdf. In Proceedings of the 34th international conference on very large data bases (VLDB)

  24. Oren E, Delbru R, Catasta M, Cyganiak R, Stenzhorn H, Tummarello G (2008) Sindice.com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. Int J Metadata Sem Ontol 3(1):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pérez J, Arenas M, Gutierrez C (2006) Semantics and complexity of sparql. In: Cruz I, Decker S, Allemang D, Preist C, Schwabe D, Mika P, Uschold M, Aroyo L (eds) 5th international semantic web conference, Athens, USA. LNCS, vol 4273. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prud’hommeaux E (2007) Case study: federate for drug research. Online at http://www.w3.org/2004/10/04-pharmaFederate/

  27. Prud’hommeaux E, Seaborne A (2008) SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C Recommendation, Jan. 2008. Online at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  28. Quilitz B, Leser U (2008) Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In: Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference (ESWC). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5021. Springer, Berlin, pp 524–538

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sheth AP, Larson JA (1990) Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput Surv 22(3):183–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Umbrich J, Hausenblas M, Hogan A, Polleres A, Decker S (2010) Towards dataset dynamics: change frequency of linked open data sources. In Proceedings of the 3rd linked data on the web workshop (LDOW) located at the 19th international world wide web conference (WWW)

  31. W3C OWL Working Group (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language—document overview. W3C Recommendation, Oct. 2009. Online at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-overview

  32. Weiss C, Karras P, Bernstein A (2008) Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management. In Proceedings of the 34th international conference on very large data bases (VLDB)

  33. Widom J (1995) Research problems in data warehousing. In Proceedings of the international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), pp 25–30

  34. Williams GT (2010) PARQL 1.1 service description. W3C Working Draft, Jan. 2010. Online at http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Hartig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartig, O., Langegger, A. A Database Perspective on Consuming Linked Data on the Web. Datenbank Spektrum 10, 57–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-010-0021-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-010-0021-7

Keywords

Navigation