Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid and efficient method to extract metagenomic DNA from estuarine sediments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
3 Biotech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metagenomic DNA from sediments of selective estuaries of Goa, India was extracted using a simple, fast, efficient and environment friendly method. The recovery of pure metagenomic DNA from our method was significantly high as compared to other well-known methods since the concentration of recovered metagenomic DNA ranged from 1185.1 to 4579.7 µg/g of sediment. The purity of metagenomic DNA was also considerably high as the ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm ranged from 1.88 to 1.94. Therefore, the recovered metagenomic DNA was directly used to perform various molecular biology experiments viz. restriction digestion, PCR amplification, cloning and metagenomic library construction. This clearly proved that our protocol for metagenomic DNA extraction using silica gel efficiently removed the contaminants and prevented shearing of the metagenomic DNA. Thus, this modified method can be used to recover pure metagenomic DNA from various estuarine sediments in a rapid, efficient and eco-friendly manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alm EW, Zheng D, Raskin L (2000) The presence of humic substances and DNA in RNA extracts affects hybridization results. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4547–4554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amorim JH, Macena TN, Lacerda GVJ, Rezende RP, Dias JC, Brendel M, Cascardo JC (2008) An improved extraction protocol for metagenomic DNA from a soil of the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Genet Mol Res 7:1226–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bag S, Saha B, Mehta O, Anbumani D, Kumar N, Dayal M et al (2016) An improved method for high quality metagenomics DNA extraction from human and environmental samples. Sci Rep 6:26775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand H, Poly F, Van VT, Lombard N, Nalin R, Vogel TM, Simonet P (2005) High molecular weight DNA recovery from soils prerequisite for biotechnological metagenomic library construction. J Microbiol Methods 62:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann H, Pesaro M, Widmer F, Zeyer J (2001) A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil. J Microbiol Methods 45:7–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg CD, Ritz K, Griffith BS (1997) Direct isolation of microbial community DNA from humified upland soils. Appl Microbiol 25:30–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:470–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devi SG, Fathima AA, Radha S, Arunraj R, Curtis WR, Ramya M (2015) A rapid and economical method for efficient DNA extraction from diverse soils suitable for metagenomic applications. PLoS ONE 10:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson NJ, Hermansson M, Wilén B-M (2013) The choice of PCR primers has great impact on assessments of bacterial community diversity and dynamics in a wastewater treatment plant. PLoS ONE 8:e76431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanahan D (1983) Studies on the transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM (1998) Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 5:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holben WE (1994) Isolation and purification of bacterial DNA from soil. In: Weaver RW, Mickelson SH (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. microbiological and biochemical properties, SSSA book series no. 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 727–751

  • Hugenholtz P, Pace NR (1996) Identifying microbial diversity in the natural environment: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Trends Biotechnol 14:190–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kresk M, Wellington EMH (1999) Comparison of different methods for the isolation and purification of total community DNA from soil. J Microbiol Methods 39:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakay FM, Botha A, Prior BA (2006) Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils. J Appl Microbiol 100:1365–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz P, Schleper C (2002) Metagenome-a challenging source of enzyme discovery. J Mol Catal B Enzyme 9:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna MG, Anno DV, Danovaro R (2006) DNA extraction procedure: a critical issue for bacterial diversity assessment in marine sediments. Environ Microbiol 8:308–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L, Hallet S, Chaussod R, Germon JC, Soulas G, Catroux G (2001) DNA extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2354–2359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL, Ghiorse WC (1999) Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedure for soil and sediments sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4715–4724

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • More MI, Herrick JB, Silva MC, Ghiorse WC, Madsen EL (1994) Quantitative cell lysis of indigenous microorganisms and rapid extraction of DNA from sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1572–1580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair HP, Vincent H, Bhat SG (2014) Evaluation of five in situ lysis protocols for PCR amenable metagenomic DNA from mangrove soils. Biotechnol Rep 4:134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi MR, Heiskanen I, Wallenius K, Lindström K (2001) Extraction and purification of DNA in rhizosphere soil samples for PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial consortia. J Microbiol Methods 45:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgard L, Traavik T, Nielsen KM (2005) Nucleic acid isolation from ecological samples vertebrate gut flora. Methods Enzyme 395:8–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondon MR, Goodman RM, Handelsman J (1999) The Earth’s bounty: assessing and accessing soil microbial diversity. Trends Biotechnol 17:403–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rondon MR, August PR, Bettermann AD, Brady SF, Grossman TH, Liles MR, Loiacono KA, Lynch BA, MacNeil IA, Minor C, Tiong C, Gilman M, Osburne MS, Clardy J, Handelsman J, Goodman RM (2000) Cloning the soil metagenome: a strategy for accessing the genetic and functional diversity of uncultured microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2541–2547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roose-Amsaleg CL, Garnier-Sillam E, Harry M (2001) Extraction and purification of microbial DNA from soil and sediment samples. Appl Soil Ecol 18:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar K, Singh SP, Goutam KK, Konwar BK (2014) Assessment of five soil DNA extraction methods and a rapid laboratory-developed method for quality soil DNA extraction for 16S rDNA-based amplification and library construction. J Microbiol Methods 97(1):68–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Detection and analysis of protein expressed from cloned genes. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol III, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA, pp 1847–1858

    Google Scholar 

  • Santosa DA (2001) Rapid extraction and purification of environmental DNA for molecular cloning application and molecular diversity studies. Mol Biotechnol 17:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Sharma KK, Kuhad RC (2014) An efficient and economical method for extraction of DNA amenable to biotechnological manipulations, from diverse soils and sediments. J Appl Microbiol 116:923–933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Kachiprath B, Jayanath G, Sajeevan TP, Singh IB, Philip R (2016) High-quality metagenomic DNA from marine sediment samples for genomic studies through a preprocessing approach. 3 Biotech 6(2):160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbe CC, Vahjen W (1993) Interference of humic acids and DNA extracted directly from soil in detection and transformation of recombinant DNA from bacteria and a yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2657–2665

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theron J, Cloete TE (2000) Molecular techniques for determining microbial diversity and community structure in natural environments. Crit Rev Microbiol 26:37–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tien CC, Chao CC, Chao WL (1999) Methods for DNA extraction from various soils: a comparison. J Appl Microbiol 86:937–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Ovreas L (2002) Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:240–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YL, Olson BH (1992) Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2292–2295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates C, Gillings MR, Davison AD, Altavilla N, Veal DA (1997) PCR amplification of crude microbial DNA extracted from soil. Lett Appl Microbiol 25:303–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates C, Gilling MR, Davison AD, Altaviilla N, Veal DA (1998) Methods for microbial DNA extraction from soil for PCR amplification. Bio Proced Online 1:40–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kashif Shamim is grateful to the University Grants Commission, Government of India for financial support as Maulana Azad National Fellowship (JRF & SRF). He is also thankful to Microbiology Department, Goa University for providing laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar Dubey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamim, K., Sharma, J. & Dubey, S.K. Rapid and efficient method to extract metagenomic DNA from estuarine sediments. 3 Biotech 7, 182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0846-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0846-y

Keywords

Navigation