Abstract
Triclosan (TCS), a synthetic antimicrobial, has been incorporated into a variety of personal care products worldwide. Since 2016, upon the recommendation of World Health Organization (WHO), the use of TCS-containing sutures (TCSCS) to prevent surgical site infections (SSI) has become a common practice. However, TCS is a subject of environmental and public health concern and has been ranked as a chemical of serious concern to be avoided based on GreenScreen® hazard assessment. Recent reports on the efficacy of TCSCS to prevent SSI have revealed conflicting results. Here, we aim to highlight and discuss various safety and antimicrobial resistance concerns associated with the generalized use of TCSCS. Further, we emphasize that the long-term health benefits must be evaluated before the incorporation of TCS into surgical sutures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahmed I, Boulton AJ, Rizvi S et al (2019) The use of triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BMJ Open 9:e029727
An J, He H, Yao W et al (2020) PI3K/Akt/FoxO pathway mediates glycolytic metabolism in HepG2 cells exposed to triclosan (TCS). Environ Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105428
Banerjee A, Dubnau E, Quemard A et al (1994) inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8284673
Baracs J, Huszár O, Sajjadi SG, Peter Horváth O (2011) Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. uncoated sutures (PDS II): a randomized multicenter study. Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2011.001
Barbolt TA (2002) Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on coated VICRYL. Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan). Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/10962960260496334
Brenwald NP, Fraise AP (2003) Triclosan resistance in metacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 55:141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00222-6
Bucher BT, Guth RM, Elward AM et al (2011) Risk factors and outcomes of surgical site infection in children. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.065
Chuanchuen R, Karkhoff-Schweizer RAR, Schweizer HP (2003) High-level triclosan resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is solely a result of efflux. Am J Infect Control. https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2003.11
Daoud FC, Edmiston CE, Leaper D (2014) Meta-analysis of prevention of surgical site infections following incision closure with triclosan-coated sutures: Robustness to new evidence. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 15:165–181
de Duarte NAA, de Lima LE, Maraslis FT et al (2021) Acute toxicity and DNA instability induced by exposure to low doses of triclosan and phthalate DEHP, and their combinations, in vitro. Front Genet. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.649845
Deliaert AE, Van den Kerckhove E, Tuinder S et al (2009) The effect of triclosan-coated sutures in wound healing. A double blind randomised prospective pilot study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.075
de Jonge SW, Atema JJ, Solomkin JS, Boermeester MA (2017) Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10445
Diener MK, Knebel P, Kieser M et al (2014) Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60238-5
Edmiston CE, Daoud FC, Leaper D (2013) Is there an evidence-based argument for embracing an antimicrobial (triclosan)-coated suture technology to reduce the risk for surgical-site infections? A meta-analysis. Surg (United States) 155:362–363
Fang JL, Stingley RL, Beland FA et al (2010) (2010) Occurrence, efficacy, metabolism, and toxicity of triclosan. J Environ Sci Health Part C 28(3):147–171
Faulkner S (2016) Antibacterial coated suture wins WHO recommendation. https://www.drugdeliverybusiness.com/antibacterial-coated-suture-wins-recommendation/. Accessed 5 Jan 2021
Filho PSS, Santos M, Colafranceschi AS et al (2019) Effect of using triclosan-impregnated polyglactin suture to prevent infection of saphenectomy wounds in cabg: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0048
Galal I, El-Hindawy K (2011) Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.011
Gilbert P, McBain AJ (2002) Literature-based evaluation of the potential risks associated with impregnation of medical devices and implants with triclosan. Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/10962960260496343
GreenScreen (2014) Triclosan (CAS # 3380–34-5) GreenScreen® for safer chemicals (GreenScreen®) assessment. ToxServices LLC, Washington, DC
Guo J, Pan LH, Li YX et al (2016) Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Surg Res 201:105–117
Hara T, Miyoshi A, Tanaka A et al (2017) Can triclosan-coated sutures and the use of double gloves reduce the incidence of surgical site infections? J Clin Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo429w
Heath RJ, Rock CO (2000) Microbiology: a triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/35018162
Heath RJ, Rubin JR, Holland DR et al (1999) Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.16.11110
Henriksen NA, Deerenberg EB, Venclauskas L et al (2017) Triclosan-coated sutures and surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: the TRISTAN review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1681-0
Hollenbeak CS, Alfrey EJ, Souba WW (2001) The effect of surgical site infections on outcomes and resource utilization after liver transplantation. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2001.116666
Hüttner FJ, Diener MK (2017) Sutures and surgical site infections: children versus adults and single centre versus multicentre trials. Lancet Infect Dis 17:3–4
Isik I, Selimen D, Senay S, Alhan C (2012) Efficiency of antibacterial suture material in cardiac surgery: a double-blind randomized prospective study. Heart Surg Forum. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111106
Jackowski S, Murphy CM, Cronan JE, Rock CO (1989) Acetoacetyl-acyl carrier protein synthase. A target for the antibiotic thiolactomycin. J Biol Chem 264(13):7624–7629
James M, Ambadapadi S, Falany C (2015) Triclosan inhibits the activity of expressed human sulfotransferases (SULTs) towards their diagnostic substrates. FASEB J 29:622–624
Justinger C, Schuld J, Sperling J et al (2011) Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after hepatobiliary surgery-a prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0786-7
Justinger C, Slotta JE, Ningel S et al (2013) Surgical-site infection after abdominal wall closure with triclosan-impregnated polydioxanone sutures: results of a randomized clinical pathway facilitated trial (NCT00998907). Surg (united States). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.011
Karlowsky JA, Kaplan N, Hafkin B et al (2009) AFN-1252, a FabI inhibitor, demonstrates a staphylococcus-specific spectrum of activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00400-09
Khan R, Kong HG, Jung YH et al (2016) Triclosan resistome from metagenome reveals diverse enoyl acyl carrier protein reductases and selective enrichment of triclosan resistance genes. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32322
Khan R, Roy N, Choi K, Lee SW (2018) Distribution of triclosan-resistant genes in major pathogenic microorganisms revealed by metagenome and genome-wide analysis. PLoS ONE 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192277
Kim SH, Khan R, Choi K et al (2020) A triclosan-resistance protein from the soil metagenome is a novel enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase: structure-guided functional analysis. FEBS J. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15267
Leaper D, Assadian O, Hubner NO et al (2011) Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan. Int Wound J 8(6):556–566
Leaper DJ, Edmiston CE, Holy CE (2017) Meta-analysis of the potential economic impact following introduction of absorbable antimicrobial sutures. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10443
Leaper DJ, Holy CE, Spencer M et al (2020) Assessment of the risk and economic burden of surgical site infection following colorectal surgery using a US longitudinal database: is there a role for innovative antimicrobial wound closure technology to reduce the risk of infection? Dis Colon Rectum 63:1628–1638. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001799
Lee DG, Zhao F, Rezenom YH et al (2012) Biodegradation of triclosan by a wastewater microorganism. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.025
Liang Y, Zhang H, Cai Z (2021) New insights into the cellular mechanism of triclosan-induced dermal toxicity from a combined metabolomic and lipidomic approach. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143976
Magill SS, Hellinger W, Cohen J et al (2012) Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1086/664048
Marshall N, Long C, Anderson K et al (2014) Dermal exposure to the commonly used antimicrobial chemical triclosan promotes allergic responses in skin and lung (HYP7P.317). J Immunol 192:119–132
Mattavelli I, Rebora P, Doglietto G et al (2015) Multi-center randomized controlled trial on the effect of triclosan-coated sutures on surgical site infection after colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2014.005
McMurry LM, Oethinger M, Levy SB (1998a) Overexpression of marA, soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13905.x
McMurry LM, Oethinger M, Levy SB (1998b) Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature 394:531
Mingmalairak C (2011) Antimicrobial sutures: new strategy in surgical site infections. Sci against Microb Pathog Commun Curr Res Technol Adv 313:23
Mingmalairak C, Ungbhakorn P, Paocharoen V (2009) Efficacy of antimicrobial coating suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl Plus) compared with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis, double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report. J Med Assoc Thail 92(6):770
Nakamura T, Kashimura N, Noji T et al (2013) Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery (united States). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.018
Narasimha Rao K, Lakshminarasimhan A, Joseph S et al (2015) AFN-1252 is a potent inhibitor of enoyl-ACP reductase from Burkholderia pseudomallei—crystal structure, mode of action, and biological activity. Protein Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2655
Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ (2015) Co-occurrence of resistance genes to antibiotics, biocides and metals reveals novel insights into their co-selection potential. BMC Genom. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2153-5
Parikh KS, Omiadze R, Josyula A et al (2021) Ultra-thin, high strength, antibiotic-eluting sutures for prevention of ophthalmic infection. Bioeng Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10204
Pelz K, Tödtmann N, Otten JE (2015) Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria. Ann Agric Environ Med Doi 10(5604/12321966):1167733
Piddock LJV (2006) Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps—not just for resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1464
Prabha S, Sowndarya J, Ram PJVS et al (2021) Chitosan-coated surgical sutures prevent adherence and biofilms of mixed microbial communities. Curr Microbiol 78:502–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02306-7
Prichystalova R, Fini JB, Trasande L et al (2017) Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan. Environ Heal A Glob Access Sci Source. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0265-x
Rasić Z, Schwarz D, Adam VN et al (2011) Efficacy of antimicrobial triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl* Plus) suture for closure of the abdominal wall after colorectal surgery. Coll Antropol 35(2):439–443
Renko M, Paalanne N, Tapiainen T et al (2017) Triclosan-containing sutures versus ordinary sutures for reducing surgical site infections in children: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30373-5
Rolston KVI, Nesher L, Tarrand JT (2014) Current microbiology of surgical site infections in patients with cancer: a retrospective review. Infect Dis Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0048-4
Rozzelle CJ, Leonardo J, Li V (2008) Antimicrobial suture wound closure for cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED/2008/2/8/111
Ruiz-Tovar J, Alonso N, Morales V, Llavero C (2015) Association between triclosan-coated sutures for abdominal wall closure and incisional surgical site infection after open surgery in patients presenting with fecal peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2014.072
Russell AD (2004) Whither triclosan? J Antimicrob Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh171
Sanchez P, Moreno E, Martinez JL (2005) The biocide triclosan selects Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mutants that overproduce the SmeDEF multidrug efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.2.781-782.2005
Sandini M, Mattavelli I, Nespoli L et al (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of sutures coated with triclosan for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery according to the PRISMA statement. Med (United States) 95. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004057
Schmid MB, Kaplan N (2004) Reduced triclosan susceptibility in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.4.1397-1399.2004
Seaman PF, Ochs D, Day MJ (2007) Small-colony variants: a novel mechanism for triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl450
SenGupta M, Banerjee D, Sengupta M et al (2014) In vitro efficacy of triclosan coated polyglactin 910 suture against common bacterial pathogen causing surgical site infection. Int J Infect Control. https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v10i2.013.14
Sippel KH, Vyas NK, Zhang W et al (2014) Crystal structure of the human fatty acid synthase enoyl-acyl carrier protein-reductase domain complexed with triclosan reveals allosteric protein-protein interface inhibition. J Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.608547
Steingrimsson S, Thimour-Bergström L, Roman-Emanuel C et al (2015) Triclosan-coated sutures and sternal wound infections: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2485-8
Syed AK, Ghosh S, Love NG, Boles BR (2014) Triclosan promotes Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization. Mbio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01015-13
Teplova VV, Belosludtsev KN, Kruglov AG (2017) Mechanism of triclosan toxicity: mitochondrial dysfunction including complex II inhibition, superoxide release and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. Toxicol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.05.004
Thimour-Bergström L, Roman-Emanuel C, Scherstén H et al (2013) Triclosan-coated sutures reduce surgical site infection after open vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt063
Today I control (2016) Triclosan-coated sutures now recommended by the world health organization. https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/triclosan-coated-sutures-now-recommended-world-health-organization. Accessed 25 Dec 2020
Turtiainen J, Saimanen EIT, Mäkinen KT et al (2012) Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the incidence of surgical wound infection after lower limb revascularization surgery: a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1655-4
Unverzagt S, Prondzinsky R, Peinemann F (2013) Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 66(11):1271–1280
Walters GI, Robertson AS, Moore VC, Burge PS (2017) Occupational asthma caused by sensitization to a cleaning product containing triclosan. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2016.12.001
Wang ZX, Jiang CP, Cao Y, Ding YT (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 100:465–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9062
Wang X, Chen X, Feng X et al (2015) Triclosan causes spontaneous abortion accompanied by decline of estrogen sulfotransferase activity in humans and mice. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18252
Weigelt JA, Lipsky BA, Tabak YP et al (2010) Surgical site infections: causative pathogens and associated outcomes. Am J Infect Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.010
WHO (1999) WHO surgical site prevention guidelines. WHO, Geneva
Williams N, Sweetland H, Goyal S et al (2011) Randomized trial of antimicrobial-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery. Surg Infect (larchmt). https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2011.045
Wu X, Kubilay NZ, Ren J et al (2017) Antimicrobial-coated sutures to decrease surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2765-y
Yazdankhah SP, Scheie AA, Høiby EA et al (2006) Triclosan and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria: an overview. Microb Drug Resist 12:83
Yee AL, Gilbert JA (2016) Is triclosan harming your microbiome? Science 353:348
Yueh MF, Tukey RH (2016) Triclosan: a widespread environmental toxicant with many biological effects. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103417
Zhang N, Wang W, Li W et al (2015) Inhibition of 11β-HSD2 expression by triclosan via induction of apoptosis in human placental syncytiotrophoblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4376
Zhang M, Zhu R, Zhang L (2020) Triclosan stimulates human vascular endothelial cell injury via repression of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125077
Zhu L, Lin J, Ma J et al (2010) Triclosan resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 is due to FabV, a triclosan-resistant enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01152-09
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Dr. Imran Khan for taking time in critically evaluating this review article.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not Applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, R., Yee, A.L., Gilbert, J.A. et al. Triclosan-containing sutures: safety and resistance issues need to be addressed prior to generalized use. Appl Nanosci 12, 3061–3070 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01979-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01979-1