Skip to main content
Log in

Pressure Produced on the Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge by Different Impression Materials and Tray Design: An In Vivo Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J (2002) Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont 11:155–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boucher CO (1951) A critical analysis of mid-century impression techniques for full dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1:472–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frank RP (1969) Analysis of pressures produced during maxillary edentulous impression procedures. J Prosthet Dent 22:400–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank RP (1970) Controlling pressures during complete denture impressions. Dent Clin North Am 14:453–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Komiyama O, Saeki H, Kawara M (2004) Effect of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions. J Prosthet Dent 91:570–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Ahmad A (2006) Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design. J Prosthodont 15:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rihani A (1981) Pressures involved in making upper edentulous impressions. J Prosthet Dent 46:610–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell AH, Manly RS (1948) An electronic strain gauge for measuring oral forces. J Dent Res 27:705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stromberg WR (1955) A method of measuring forces of denture bases against supporting tissues. J Prosthet Dent 5:268–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subash M. Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, S.M., Mohan, C.A., Vijitha, D. et al. Pressure Produced on the Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge by Different Impression Materials and Tray Design: An In Vivo Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 509–512 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2

Keywords

Navigation