Abstract
Children’s early awareness about cancer, through exposure to cancer biology and prevention strategies and research principles, is a promising focus of education and learning. It may also benefit the pipeline of people entering into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers. We describe an educational pilot program for elementary school students, using developmentally appropriate activities focused on cancer at a museum dedicated to children’s maker-centered learning and STEM. The program was implemented through a public school in Washington, DC serving students underrepresented in STEM. Program conceptualization, museum and school engagement, and maker learning pedagogy are described, as well as curricular outcomes. A total of N = 111 students (44% female, 75% Black/African American, 5% Latine) participated in a day-long field trip. Museum educators, assisted by cancer center researchers, led a multipart workshop on cancer and the environment and hands-on rotation of activities in microbiology, immunology, and ultraviolet radiation safety; students then completed self-report evaluations. Results indicate that nearly all (> 95%) students practiced activities typical of a STEM professional at the program, and > 70% correctly answered factual questions about topics studied. Importantly, 87–94% demonstrated clear STEM interest, a sense of belonging in the field, and practice implementing skills for success in STEM (e.g., perseverance, imagination, teamwork). This pilot demonstrated acceptability and feasibility in delivering a cancer-focused curriculum to underserved elementary students using maker learning while favorably impacting key objectives. Future scale-up of this program is warranted, with the potential to increase students’ motivation to engage in STEM and cancer research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Matt B, Stevenson M, Falloon G, Forbes A, Hatzigianni M (2018) Makerspaces in primary school settings – advancing 21st century and STEM capabilities using 3D Design and 3D Printing. https://primarymakers.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/makerspaces-in-primary-school-settings-full-report-2018v2.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2024
Petrich M, Wilkinson K, Bevan B (2013) It looks like fun. In: Honey M, Kanter DE (eds) but are they learning? In Design, make, play: growing the next generation of STEM innovators. Routledge, New York, pp 50–70
Brahms L, Wardrip P (2014) The learning practices of making: an evolving framework for design. Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh. https://libraries.idaho.gov/files/MAKESHOP%20Learning%20Practices%20formatted%20v6.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2024
Maker Education Initiative (2015) Youth makerspace playbook. https://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Youth-Makerspace-Playbook_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2024
Resnick M (2017) Lifelong kindergarten: cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT Press
Museum KID (2023) KID Inventors Program 2022–2023 impact. https://kid-museum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/KID-Museum-MCPS-2022-2023-Report-KID-Inventors.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2024
Al-Hosni K, Chan MF, Al-Azri M (2021) The effectiveness of interventional cancer education programs for school students aged 8–19 years: a systematic review. J Cancer Educ 36(2):229–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01868-1
Ayers KA, Wade-Jaimes K, Wang L, Pennella RA, Pounds SB (2020) The St. Jude STEM clubs: an afterschool STEM club for upper elementary school students in Memphis, TN. JSTEM 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v3i1.13
Stockard J, Rohlfing CM, Richmond GL (2021) Equity for women and underrepresented minorities in STEM: graduate experiences and career plans in chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(4). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020508118
Chester A, Hanks S, Kuhn S, Jones F, White T, Harris M, Hornbeck B et al (2018) Social media based STEM enrichment curriculum positively impacts rural adolescent health measures. JSTEM 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v1i1.17
D’Agostino EM, Freudenberg N (2019) Population thinking instruction in high schools: a public health intervention with triple benefits. J Urban Health 96(6):902–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00383-z
Wilson RT, Watson E, Kaelin M, Huebner W (2018) Early preparation and inspiration for STEM careers: preliminary report of the epidemiology challenge randomized intervention, 2014–2015. Public Health Rep 133(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354917746983
The Education Trust and MDRC (2021) Targeted intensive tutoring expanded learning time the importance of strong relationships. https://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Expanded-Learning-Time-as-a-Strategy-to-Solve-Unfinished-Learning-March-2021.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2024
Hughes RM, Nzekwe B, Molyneaux KJ (2013) The single sex debate for girls in science: a comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Res Sci Educ 43(5):1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7
Ramsey LR, Betz DE, Sekaquaptewa D (2013) The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Soc Psychol Educ 16(3):377–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6
Syed M, Goza BK, Chemers MM, Zurbriggen EL (2012) Individual differences in preferences for matched-ethnic mentors among high-achieving ethnically diverse adolescents in STEM. Child Dev 83(3):896–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01744.x
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the faculty and staff of Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and KID Museum, as well as the local elementary students and staff, for their participation.
Funding
This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (P30CA051008) and the David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Kenneth P. Tercyak; Mary Rose Yockel; Dorothy Jones-Davis; Marcelo M. Sleiman, Jr.; and Mingqian Liu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kenneth P. Tercyak, Mary Rose Yockel, and Marcelo M. Sleiman, Jr., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This program was reviewed by the sponsoring university’s institutional review board and was determined to not meet the requirements of human subjects research.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tercyak, K.P., Yockel, M.R., Eyl, J. et al. Leveraging Maker Learning in STEM to Promote Children’s Interest in Cancer Research: A Pilot Program. J Canc Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02445-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02445-6