Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but globally, it is underutilized. In Russia, practice patterns with regard to liver-directed radiation are unknown. Under the auspices of Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our team conducted an IRB-approved contouring workshop for Russian radiation oncologists. Pre- and post-workshop surveys were analyzed to determine baseline clinical experience and patterns of care for liver-directed RT among Russian providers. The effect of the contouring workshop on participants’ knowledge was tested using mixed effects model. Forty pre-workshop and 24 post-workshop questionnaires were analyzable with a 100% response rate. Sixty percent of respondents had never evaluated a patient with HCC and only 8% (3 out of 40) reported treating an HCC patient with liver-directed RT. Nonetheless, 73% of respondents were comfortable offering liver-directed RT prior to the workshop. After the workshop, 85% of respondents felt comfortable treating a patient with HCC with liver-directed RT and 50% were comfortable recommending stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Measures of knowledge pertaining to evaluation of HCC patients and selection for appropriate liver-directed therapies were dramatically improved after the workshop. Liver-directed RT is not commonly used in Russia in the management of patients with HCC, and few centers are equipped for motion management. Our contouring workshop resulted in dramatically improved understanding of the evaluation and management of HCC patients. We recommend starting with a more protracted fractionated RT and building experience through attendance of additional educational activities, participation in multidisciplinary liver tumor boards, and prospective analysis of treatment toxicity and outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386
(2017) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncol 3:524–548
Dawson LA (2011) Overview: where does radiation therapy fit in the spectrum of liver cancer local-regional therapies? Semin Radiat Oncol 21:241–246
Bazin I, Omelyanovsky V, Avkentyeva M, Krysanov I, Ivakhnenko O Analysis of the socioeconomic burden of hepatocellular carcinoma in Russia. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17067986. Accessed 13 Oct 2018
Conference ‘tumors of the upper GI tract’ (April 13–14, 2017, Moscow). Available at: https://rosoncoweb.ru/events/2017/04/13/archive/. Accessed 13 Oct 2018
Gillespie EF, Panjwani N, Golden DW, Gunther J, Chapman TR, Brower JV, Kosztyla R, Larson G, Neppala P, Moiseenko V, Bykowski J, Sanghvi P, Murphy JD (2017) Multi-institutional randomized trial testing the utility of an interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas among radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:547–554
Brock KK (2011) Imaging and image-guided radiation therapy in liver cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 21:247–255
Crane CH, Koay EJ (2016) Solutions that enable ablative radiotherapy for large liver tumors: fractionated dose painting, simultaneous integrated protection, motion management, and computed tomography image guidance. Cancer 122:1974–1986
Cervero RM, Gaines JK (2015) The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 35:131–138
Davis NL, Davis DA, Johnson NM, Grichnik KL, Headrick LA, Pingleton SK, Bower E, Gibbs R (2013) Aligning academic continuing medical education with quality improvement: a model for the 21st century. Acad Med 88:1437–1441
McClelland S, Chernykh M, Dengina N, Gillespie EF, Likhacheva A, Usychkin S, Pankratov A, Kharitonova E, Egorova Y, Tsimafeyeu I, Tjulandin S, Thomas CR, Mitin T (2018) Bridging the gap in global advanced radiation oncology training: impact of a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas on radiation oncologist practice in Russia. J Cancer Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7
Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ (2011) Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306:978–988
Curran V, Lockyer J, Sargeant J, Fleet L (2006) Evaluation of learning outcomes in web-based continuing medical education. Acad Med 81:S30–S34
Funding
The Russian Society of Clinical Oncology provided travel funding for Likhacheva and Mitin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 12 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitin, T., Degnin, C., Chen, Y. et al. Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Russia: a Survey-Based Analysis of Current Practice and the Impact of an Educational Workshop on Clinical Expertise. J Canc Educ 35, 105–111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1447-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1447-0