Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe how patient information needs change over the course of receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Convenience sampling was utilized to recruit men with stage I–III prostate cancer. A longitudinal repeated measures design was implemented for this pilot study. Patients were presented with 36 paired comparisons, each asking the participant to choose the most important information topic(s) for today. Following completion of the survey instruments, the clinic nurse delivered the four top-ranked information topic handouts to each patient with brief instruction on how to use the handouts. Over the course of 6 months, we were able to recruit 35 men. The four highest priority topics across all four sessions were prognosis, stage of disease, treatment options, and side effects. Our results suggest trends in the information priorities that men hold over the course of radiation treatment. The information priorities do appear to shift over time, notably prognosis concerns and risk for family members continued to rise over time, while side effect information declined. These findings will extend an already strong foundation of evidence for preparatory information in radiation therapy. Furthermore, these findings will strengthen current evidence that computerized assessment of patient self-report information is feasible and an important adjunct to clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel R et al (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29
Advisory, C.C.S.s. and C.o.C. Statistics (2013) Canadian cancer statistics. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto
Mohan R, Schellhammer PF (2011) Treatment options for localized prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician 84(4):413–420
Davison BJ et al (2002) Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 25(1):42–49
Davison J et al (2003) Provision of individualized information to men with prostate cancer and their partners. Oncol Nurs Forum 30:107–114
Davison BJ et al (2003) Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30(1):107–114
Johnson JE et al (1988) Reducing the negative impact of radiation therapy on functional status. Cancer 61(1):46–51
Haggmark C et al (2001) Effects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life in cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapy. Patient Educ Couns 45(3):173–179
Schofield P et al (2008) Preparing patients for threatening medical treatments: effects of a chemotherapy educational DVD on anxiety, unmet needs, and self-efficacy. Support Care Cancer 16(1):37–45
Templeton H, Coates V (2004) Evaluation of an evidence-based education package for men with prostate cancer on hormonal manipulation therapy. Patient Educ Couns 55(1):55–61
Long LE (2001) Being informed: undergoing radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 24(6):463–468
Hinds C, Streater A, Mood D (1995) Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy. Perceptions of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 18(5):374–384
Berry DL et al (2011) Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29(8):1029–1035
Berry DL et al (2013) The personal patient profile-prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial. Urol Oncol 31(7):1012–1021
Skinner HA, Allen BA (1983) Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. J Consult Clin Psychol 51(2):267–275
O’Connor KP, Hallam RS, Hinchcliffe R (1989) Evaluation of a computer interview system for use with neuro-otology patients. Clin Otolaryngol 14(1):3–9
Taenzer PA et al (1997) Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic. Cancer Pract 5(3):168–175
Yarnold PR et al (1996) Assessing functional status of elderly adults via microcomputer. Percept Mot Skills 82(2):689–690
Pouwer F et al (1998) A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well- being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual Life Res 7(1):33–38
Taenzer P et al (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 9(3):203–213
Berry DL et al (2004) Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E75–E83
Davison BJ, Degner LF (1997) Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 20(3):187–196
Davison J, Kirk P, Degner L (1999) Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns 37:255–263
Acknowledgments
The Oncology Nursing Society Foundation provided funding for our study. We would like to acknowledge the staff of the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Radiation Oncology Clinic and all the men who participated in this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolpin, S.E., Parks, J., Galligan, M. et al. Information Needs of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer During Radiation Therapy. J Canc Educ 31, 142–146 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0804-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0804-5