Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the current situation and determine the factors affecting the social acceptance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in Japan. This study used data of approximately 20,300 samples collected from multiple surveys. The results clarified the following aspects: 1) in cases where the usage frequency and service using AVs as public transport were disclosed while questioning, the correlation and consistency between the “pros and cons” and “intention to use” become stronger; 2) social acceptance of AVs is affected by “intention to use,” gender, recognition of AVs demonstration experiment, population density in descending order; and 3) based on the results of this study, some policies to improve social acceptance of AVs were proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taniguchi, A., Tomio, Y., Kawashima, Y., Enoch, M., Ieromonachou, P., Morikawa, T.: Social acceptance of autonomous vehicle in Japan focused on “pros and cons” and “risk perception”, proceedings of infrastructure planning and management, Vol. 56, 2017, CD-ROM. (in Japanese)
InterRisk Research Institute & Consulting, Inc.: Investigation result on social acceptance of automatic driving system, 2017. (in Japanese)
Nishihori, Y., Yang, J., Ando, R., Morikawa, T.: Understanding social acceptability of drivers for the diffusion of autonomous vehicles in Japan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. (2017)
Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. The report of The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (2014)
Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B.: “Societal and Individual Acceptance of Autonomous Driving”, Autonomous Driving Technical, Legal, and Social Aspects, Springer, 2016
Becker, F., Axhausen, K.W.: Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation. 44(6), 1293–1306 (2017)
Cavoli, C. et al.: “Social and behavioral questions associated with automated vehicles. A literature review”, London: department for Transport, 2017
KPMG International: “Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index: Assessing Countries’ Openness and Preparedness for Autonomous Vehicles”, 2018
Nishihori, Y., Kimura, K., Taniguchi, A., Morikawa, T.: “Meta-analysis on Social Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Focused on “Pros and Cons””, Proceedings of infrastructure planning and management, Vol. 57, CD-ROM, 2018. (in Japanese)
Nishihori, Y., Tomio, Y., Taniguchi, A., Morikawa, T.: “Awareness toward autonomous vehicles from the view point of test ride participants”, proceedings of infrastructure planning and management, Vol. 55, 2017. CD-ROM. (in Japanese)
Nishihori, Y., Doi, T.: “A study on the consciousness of Car ownership focus on the contributing factors of society, phycology and economy”, proceedings of infrastructure planning and management, Vol. 56, 2017. CD-ROM. (in Japanese)
Slovic, P.: Perception of risk. Science. 236(4799), 280–285 (1987)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism), Aichi prefecture, Kasugai city, Ama city, and Kota town and those who had provided the data used in this study. This work was supported in part by a grant from The Japan Research Center for Transport Policy, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16H02367 and Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency, JST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishihori, Y., Kimura, K., Taniguchi, A. et al. What Affects Social Acceptance and Use Intention for Autonomous Vehicles --Benefits, Risk Perception, or Experience? -Meta-Analysis in Japan-. Int. J. ITS Res. 18, 22–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-018-0170-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-018-0170-x