Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Hydrogeologic-Landscapes Framework for Depressional-Wetland Vegetation in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, USA

  • Wetland Ecology
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous wetland depressions occur across the U.S. Atlantic Coastal Plain, a region of complex physiography spanning a landward-to-seaward elevation gradient. Coastal Plain depressional wetlands are noted for supporting a diversity of plant communities that provide important faunal habitats. Because these "isolated" wetlands are vulnerable to degradation and loss on private lands, protected and managed public lands have become important refugia for their conservation. A practical system of vegetation types and vegetation-dynamics models can aid in developing management or restoration strategies for these conserved wetlands. The concept of hydrogeologic landscapes provides a useful model framework because landform, soils, and topographic position can influence not only depression form and hydropattern, but also ecological drivers of vegetation change such as drought, fire, and land-use. In the Lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA, a hydrogeologic-landscapes approach was used to examine relationships between wetland vegetation and depression attributes such as size, soil type, and hydroperiod. The Lower Coastal Plain data were also combined with a similar Upper Coastal Plain study to provide a synthetic analysis of region-wide patterns. These studies identified a consistent set of wetland vegetation types that differed in landscape-associated depression attributes. Wetland types also differed in occurrence across sub-regions, owing in part to contrasting histories of land-use and wetland disturbance. The findings were used to develop conceptual state-change models that link wetland vegetation to depression hydropatterns and other ecological drivers in different landscape settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Datasets analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Altman-Goff KL (2016) An examination of plant community composition in six Carolina bays on the Coastal Plain of South Carolina. M.S. thesis, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/etd/1

  • Ator SW, Denver JM, Krantz DE, Newell WL, Martucci SK (2005) A surficial hydrogeologic framework for the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain. Professional Paper 1680. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA

  • Bennett SH, Nelson JB (1991) Distribution and status of Carolina bays in South Carolina. Nongame and Heritage Trust Publication No. 1. SC Wildlife & Marine Resources Department, Columbia. https://www.dnr.sc.gov/wildlife/wetlands/carolinabays.html

  • Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

  • Callahan TJ, Amatya DM, Stone PA (2017) Coastal forests and groundwater: using case studies to understand the effects of drivers and stressors for resource management. Sustainability 9:447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright JM, Wolfe WJ (2016) Chapter G: Carolina bays, and Chapter H: karst-depression wetlands. In: Insular ecosystems of the southeastern United States: a regional synthesis to support biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Professional Paper 1828. US Geological Survey, Reston VA. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp1828

  • Casey WP, Ewel KC (2006) Patterns of succession in forested depressional wetlands in north Florida, USA. Wetlands 26:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski RM (1996) Hydrologic analysis of Carolina bay wetlands at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

  • Christensen NL (2000) Vegetation of the Southeastern Coastal Plain (Chapter 11). In: Barbour MG, Billings WD (eds) North American terrestrial vegetation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, pp 397–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie J, Hausmann S (2003) Various state reactions to the SWANCC decision. Wetlands 23:653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemson Extension Service (2001) Nutrient management for South Carolina based on soil test results. Extension Circular 476. Clemson University, Clemson

  • Collins BS, Battaglia LL (2001) Hydrology effects on propagule bank expression and vegetation in six Carolina bays. Community Ecology 2:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D, Lowrance R (2011) Agricultural conservation practices and wetland ecosystem services in the wetland-rich Piedmont-Coastal Plain region. Ecological Applications 21(3):S3–S17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D, Toner MM (2004) Vegetation of Upper Coastal Plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework. Wetlands 24:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D, Sharitz RR, Barton CD (2010) Ecological outcomes and evaluation of success in passively restored Southeastern depressional wetlands. Wetlands 30:1129–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euliss NH Jr, LaBaugh JW, Frederickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK et al (2004) The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interepreting biological studies. Wetlands 24:448–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel KC (1998) Pondcypress swamps. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 405–420

  • Ewing JM, Vepraskas MJ, Broome SW, White JG (2012) Changes in wetland soil morphological and chemical properties after 15, 20, and 30 years of agricultural production. Geoderma 179–180:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairey DA (1977) South Carolina's geological framework. South Carolina Land Resources Conservation Commission, Columbia

  • Folkerts GW (1997) Citronelle ponds: little-known wetlands of the central Gulf Coastal Plain, USA. Natural Areas Journal 17:6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RC, Okuno E (2018) The shifting boundaries of Clean Water Act jurisdiction. Wetland Science & Practice 35:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellici JA, Lautier JC (2010) Hydrogeologic framework of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, North and South Carolina. In: Campbell BG, Coes AL (eds), Groundwater availability in the Atlantic Coastal Plain of North and South Carolina. Professional Paper 1773, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, pp 49–162. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1773/

  • Godwin KS, Shallenberger JP, Leopold DJ, Bedford BL (2002) Linking landscape properties to local hydrogeologic gradients and plant species occurrence in minerotrophic fens of New York State, USA: a hydrogeologic setting (HGS) framework. Wetlands 22:722–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester A (2011) Establishing the Francis Marion: National Forest history in South Carolina’s Lowcountry, 1901–1936. Forest History Today, Spring/Fall 2011:56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiergesell RA, Jones WE (2003) An updated regional water table of the Savannah River Site and related coverages. Report WSRC-TR-2003–00250. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC

  • Holm GO Jr, Sasser CE (2008) The management and ecology of the wetland grass, maidencane. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 46:51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman LK, Goebel PC, West L, Drew MB, Palik BJ (2000) Depressional wetland vegetation types: a question of plant community development. Wetlands 20:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman LK, Smith LL, Golladay SW (2012) Southeastern depressional wetlands. In: Batzer DP, Baldwin A (eds) Wetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman LK (1995) Impact of fires and hydrological regimes on vegetation in depressional wetlands of southeastern USA. In: Cerulean SI, Engstrom RT (eds) Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proceedings, Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, No. 19, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, pp 10–20

  • Klimas C, Murray E, Foti T et al (2009) An ecosystem restoration model for the Mississippi Alluvial Valley based on geomorphology, soils, and hydrology. Wetlands 29:430–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lide RF, Meentemeyer VG, Pinder JE III, Beatty LM (1995) Hydrology of a Carolina bay located on the Upper Coastal Plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lide RF (1994) Carolina bays and similar natural depression wetlands of the Savannah River Site, SC. GIS data layer. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory and University of Georgia, New Ellenton, SC

  • Marlowe MJ (2008) Status and trends of a globally imperiled Atlantic Coastal Plain wetland: links to hydrogeologic setting and conservation. M.S. thesis, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/etd/94

  • Martin KL, Kirkman LK (2009) Management of ecological thresholds to re-establish disturbance-maintained herbaceous wetlands of the south-eastern USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan L, Lemon EM Jr, Weems RE (1985) Geologic map of the area between Charleston and Orangeburg, South Carolina, scale 1:250,000. Miscellaneous Investigation Series Map I-1472. US Geological Survey

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 6.22. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach OR

  • Mulhouse JM, De Steven D, Lide RF, Sharitz RR (2005) Effects of dominant species on vegetation change in Carolina bay wetlands following a multi-year drought. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Society 132:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushet DM, McKenna OP, LaBaugh JW, Euliss NH Jr, Rosenberry DO (2018) Accommodating state shifts within the conceptual framework of the wetland continuum. Wetlands 38:647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NatureServe (2021) NatureServe Explorer Database. https://explorer.natureserve.org. Accessed 12/28/2021

  • Nelson JB (1986) The natural communities of South Carolina. SC Wildlife & Marine Resources Department, Columbia. https://www.dnr.sc.gov/land/publications.html

  • Nifong TD (1998) An ecosystematic analysis of Carolina bays in the Coastal Plain of the Carolinas. PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. https://labs.bio.unc.edu/Peet/theses/Nifong_PhD_1998.pdf

  • Nowicki RS, Rains MC, LaRoche JJ, Downs C, Kruse SE (2022) The peculiar hydrology of west-central Florida’s sandhill wetlands, ponds, and lakes – part 2: hydrogeologic controls. Wetlands 42:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01560-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peroni PA (1988) A vegetation history of the North Carolina Nature Conservancy clay-based Carolina Bay Preserve with recommendations for future research. Report to The Nature Conservancy, NC Field Office, Carrboro

  • Porcher RD Jr (1966) A floristic study of the vascular plants in nine selected Carolina bays in Berkeley County, South Carolina. M.S. thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia

  • Prowell DC (1994) Preliminary geologic map of the Barnwell 30' x 60' quadrangle, South Carolina and Georgia. Open-File Report 94–673. US Geological Survey, Atlanta, GA

  • Pyzoha JE (2003) The role of surface water and groundwater interactions within Carolina bay wetlands. M.S. thesis, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC

  • Richardson CJ, Gibbons JW (1993) Pocosins, Carolina bays, and mountain bogs. In: Martin WH, Boyce SG, Echternacht AC (eds), Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. Wiley, New York

  • Schafale MP (2012) Guide to the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh

  • Sharitz RR, Gresham CA (1998) Pocosins and Carolina bays. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 343–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1980) Soil survey of Berkeley County, South Carolina. US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy. Handbook 436, US Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • Soller DR, Mills HH (1991) Surficial geology and geomorphology. In: Horton JW, Zullo VA (eds) The Geology of the Carolinas. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp 290–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh CL, De Steven D, Guntenspergen GR (2008) Effect of climate fluctuations on long-term vegetation dynamics in Carolina bay wetlands. Wetlands 28:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter RD, Kral R (1994) The ecology, status, and conservation of two non-alluvial wetland communities in the South Atlantic and Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, USA. Biol Cons 68:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1995) Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (eds) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thurgate NY, Pechmann JHK (2007) Canopy closure, competition, and the endangered dusky gopher frog. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:1845–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (2003) Geographically isolated wetland of the United States. Wetlands 23:494–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend JF (1995) Natural areas inventory and survey of rare and endangered vascular plants in Clarendon and Williamsburg Counties, South Carolina. M.S. thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/arv_theses/273

  • USDA Forest Service (2004) Revised land and resource management plan, National Forests in Alabama. Management Bulletin R8-MB 112A. US Dept. of Agriculture, Montgomery, AL

  • USDA Forest Service (2014) Land and resource management plan, National Forests in Mississippi. Management Bulletin R8-MB 144A, US Dept. of Agriculture, Jackson, MS

  • USDA Forest Service (2017) Final revised management plan, Francis Marion National Forest. Management Bulletin R8-MB 151A. US Dept. of Agriculture, Columbia, SC

  • Weakley AS, Schafale MP (1991) Classification of pocosins of the Carolina Coastal Plain. Wetlands 11:355–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (2011) Soil hydrodynamic interpretations for wetlands. Technical Note No. 3. US Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX

  • Willoughby RH (2007) Geology and soils. In: Soil Survey Staff (eds), Soil survey of Lee County, South Carolina. US Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

  • Winter TC (2001) The concept of hydrologic landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  • Zoellner DC (2007) Ecological characterization of plant communities in nine Carolina bays of northeastern South Carolina. M.S. thesis, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/etd/100

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Lower Coastal Plain work was funded by the Vegetation and Soils Programs of the Francis Marion–Sumter National Forests; special thanks to Robin Mackie (Botanist), Dennis Law (Soil Scientist), and William Hansen (Hydrologist) for their support and assistance. Robert Eppinette (NRCS Soil Scientist and "Million-Acre Mapper") described the soil profiles; the Clemson University Soil Genesis Lab performed chemical analyses. We thank Marilyn LaSerna, Linda Lee, and James Weeg for field assistance; Richard LeBlond for help with plant identification; Carl Smith for GIS wetland-digitizing work; and Beverly Collins, Charles Sabatia, Robin Mackie, and an anonymous reviewer for comments on the manuscript. Use of trade or product names is for descriptive purposes and does not imply U.S. government endorsement.

Funding

For the Lower Coastal Plain study, see Acknowledgments. For the Upper Coastal Plain study, see De Steven and Toner (2004)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DD conceived the studies, secured funding (PI), supervised data collection, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. CAH contributed to the FMNF study design, collected field data and managed the datasets, assisted with data analyses, and contributed to manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane De Steven.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

None

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6

Table 6 Differentiated table of common species in five Lower Coastal Plain wetland types.

Table 7

Table 7 Differentiated table of common species in six general Coastal Plain wetland types.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Steven, D., Harrison, C.A. A Hydrogeologic-Landscapes Framework for Depressional-Wetland Vegetation in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, USA. Wetlands 42, 72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01582-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01582-2

Keywords

Navigation