Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Created Brackish Marsh in Eastern North Carolina

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tidal marsh creation helps remediate global warming because tidal wetlands are especially proficient at sequestering carbon (C) in soils. However, greenhouse gas (GHG) losses can offset the climatic benefits gained from C storage depending on how these tidal marshes are constructed and managed. This study attempts to determine the GHG emissions from a 4–6 year old created brackish marsh, what environmental factors governed these emissions, and how the magnitude of the fluxes relates to other wetland ecosystems. The static flux chamber method was used to measure GHG fluxes across three distinct plant zones segregated by elevation. The major of soil GHG fluxes from the marsh were from CO2 (−48–192 mg C m-2 h-1), although it was near the lower end of values reported from other wetland types having lower salinities, and would mostly be offset by photosynthetic uptake in this created brackish marsh. Methane flux was also low (−0.33–0.86 mg C m-2 h-1), likely inhibited by the high soil SO4 2− and soil redox potentials poised above −150 mV in this in this created brackish marsh environment. Low N2O flux (−0.11–0.10 mg N m-2 h-1) was due to low soil NO3 and soil redox conditions favoring complete denitrification. GHG fluxes from this created brackish marsh were generally lower than those recorded from natural marshes, suggesting that C sequestration may not be offset by the radiative forcing from soil GHG emissions if projects are designed properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altor AE, Mitsch WJ (2006) Methane flux from created riparian marshes: relationship to intermittent versus continuous inundation and emergent macrophytes. Ecological Engineering 28:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigas F, Shin JY, Hobble C, Marti-Donati A, Schäfer KVR, Pechmann I (2015) Long term carbon storage potential and CO2 sink strength of a restored salt marsh in New Jersey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 200:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett KB, Bartlett DS, Harriss RC, Sebacher DI (1987) Methane emissions along a salt-marsh salinity gradient. Biogeochemistry 4:183–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blum LK (1993) Spatina alterniflora root dynamics in a Virginia marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 102:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of north American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton DL, Beauchamp EC (1984) Field techniques using the acetylene blockage of nitrous-oxide reduction to measure denitrification. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 64:555–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christian RR, Bryant WL Jr, Brinson MM (1990) Juncus roemerianus Production and decomposition along gradients of salinity and hydroperiod. Marine Ecology Progress Series 68:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne M (1999) Soil microbiology: an exploratory approach. Delmar Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft C, Reader J, Sacco JN, Broome SW (1999) Twenty-five years of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora (loisel) marshes. Ecological Applications 9:1405–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft C, Megonigal P, Broome S, Stevenson J, Freese R, Cornell J, Zheng L, Sacco J (2003) The pace of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes. Ecological Applications 13:1417–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain CM, Silliman BR, Bertness SL, Bertness MD (2004) Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology 85:2539–2549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czobel S, Horvath L, Szirmai O, Balogh J, Pinter K, Nemeth Z, Uermoes Z, Grosz B, Tuba Z (2010) Comparison of N2O and CH4 fluxes from Pannonian natural ecosystems. European Journal of Soil Science 61:671–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delaune RD, Smith CJ, Patrick WH (1983) Methane release from gulf-coast wetlands. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology 35:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore KJ, Skiba UM, Billett MF, Rees RM, Drewer J (2009) Spatial and temporal variability in CH4 and N2O fluxes from a Scottish ombrotrophic peatland: implications for modeling and up-scaling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41:1315–1323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsey-Quirk T, Seliskar DM, Sommerfield CK, Gallagher JL (2011) Salt marsh carbon pool distribution in a mid-Atlantic lagoon, USA: sea level rise implications. Wetlands 31:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1978) Sulfate (turbidimetric). In: EPA

  • EPA (1979) Nitrogen, nitrate-nitrite (colorimetric, autometed, cadmium reduction). In: EPA

  • Etheridge JR (2013) Evaluating brackish marsh creation as a method to reduce nutrient and suspended solids loads reaching sensitive coastal ecosystems. In: Quantifying the water quality benefits of a constructed brackish marsh and tidal stream system using continuous water quality and flow monitoring. NC State University, Raleigh, p. 194

  • Evans R, Burchell M, Grabow G, Bass K, Broome S, Vepraskas M, Shear T (2009) North River wetland restoration research. In: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program

  • Foote AL, Reynolds KA (1997) Decomposition of saltmeadow cordrass (Spartina patens) in Louisiana coastal marshes. Esturies 20:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford H, Garbutt A, Jones L, Jones DL (2012) Methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes from a temperate salt marsh: grazing management does not alter global warming potential. Estuarine coastal and shelf. Science 113:182–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard G, Chanton J (1993) Quantification of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of emergent aquatic macrophytes - defining upper limits. Biogeochemistry 23:79–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez ME, Mitsch WJ (2006) Influence of hydrologic pulses, flooding frequency, and vegetation on nitrous oxide emissions from created riparian marshes. Wetlands 26:862–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm GO Jr, Perez BP, McWhorter DE, Krauss KW, Johnson DJ, Raynie RC, Killebrew CJ (2016) Ecosystem level methane fluxes from tidal freshwater and brackish marshes of the Mississippi River Delta: implications for coastal wetland carbon projects. Wetlands (in press)

  • IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. In: IPCC

  • Jakobsen P, Patrick WH, Williams BG (1981) Sulfide and methane formation in soils and sediments. Soil Science 132:279–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao-Kniffin J, Freyre DS, Balser TC (2010) Methane dynamics across wetland plant species. Aquatic Botany 93:107–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller JK, Wolf AA, Weisenhorn PB, Drake BG, Megonigal JP (2009) Elevated CO2 affects porewater chemistry in a brackish marsh. Biogeochemistry 96:101–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knox SH, Sturtevant C, Matthes JH, Koteen L, Verfaillie J, Baldocchi D (2014) Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Global Change Biology 21:750–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Whitbeck JL (2012) Soil greenhouse gas fluxes during wetland forest retreat along the lower Savannah River, Georgia (USA. Wetlands 32:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss KW, Whitbeck JL, Howard RJ (2012) On the relative roles of hydrology, salinity, temperature, and root productivity in controlling soil respiration from coastal swamps (fresh. Plant and Soil 358:265–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson JK, Schonheit P, Thauer RK (1982) Different Ks-values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria - an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Archives of Microbiology 131:278–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivila KM, Murray JW, Devol AH, Novelli PC (1989) Methane production, sulfate reduction and competition for substrates in the sediments of Lake Washington. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53:409–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Phillips EJP (1986) Organic matter mineralization with reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51:683–689

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maier RM, Pepper IL, Gerba CP (2000) Environmental microbiology. Academic, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton JM, Herbert ER, Craft CB (2012) Effects of salinity on denitrification and greenhouse gas production from laboratory-incubated tidal forest soils. Wetlands 32:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride MB (1994) Environmental chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM, Mander Ü, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Jørgensen SE, Brix H (2013) Wetlands, carbon and climate change. Landscape Ecology 28:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JL, Ardon M, Bernhardt ES (2012) Greenhouse gas fluxes in southeastern U.S. coastal plain wetlands under contrasting land uses. Ecological Applications 22:264–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moseman-Valtierra S, Gonzalez R, Kroeger KD, Tang J, Chao WC, Crusius J, Bratton J, Green A, Shelton J (2011) Short-term nitrogen additions can shift a coastal wetland from a sink to source of N2O. Atmospheric Environment 45:4390–4397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer SC, Megonigal JP (2015) Moving beyond global warming potentials to quantify the climatic role of ecosystems. Ecosystems 18:1000–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum WE, Smith TJ III, Hoover JK, McIvor CC (1984) The ecology of tidal freshwater marshes of the United States east coast: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Osland MJ, Spivak AC, Nestlerode JA, Lessmann JM, Almario AE, Heitmuller PT, Russell MJ, Krauss KW, Alvarez F, Dantin DD, Harvey JE, From AS, Cormier N, Stagg CL (2012) Ecosystem development after mangrove wetland creation: plant-soil change across a 20-year chronosequence. Ecosystems 15:848–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poffenbarger HJ, Needelman BA, Megonigal JP (2011) Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31:831–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam WM (1993) Carbon-dioxide and methane exports from a southeastern floodplain swamp. Ecological Monographs 63:29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roden EE, Wetzel RG (1996) Organic carbon oxidation and suppression of methane production by microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction in vegetated and unvegetated freshwater wetland sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 41:1733–1748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roslev P, King GM (1996) Regulation of methane oxidation in a freshwater wetland by water table changes and anoxia. Fems Microbiology Ecology 19:105–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roura-Carol M, Freeman C (1999) Methane release from peat soils: effects of Sphagnum and Juncus. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 31:323–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio G, Childers DL (2006) Controls on herbaceous litter decomposition in the estuarine ecotones of the Florida Everglades. Estuaries and Coasts 29:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau Y, Dham V, Tian G, Chiu C (2016) Factors influencing removal of sewage nitrogen through denitrification in mangrove soils. Wetlands (in press)

  • Smialek J, Bouchard V, Lippmann B, Quigley M, Granata T, Martin J, Brown L (2006) Effect of a woody (Salix nigra) and an herbaceous (Juncus effusus) macrophyte species on methane dynamics and denitrification. Wetlands 26:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJ, DeLaune RD, Patrick JRWH (1983) Nitrous oxide emission from Gulf Coast wetlands. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 47:1805–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stadmark J, Leonardson L (2005) Emissions of greenhouse gases from ponds constructed for nitrogen removal. Ecological Engineering 25:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom L, Mastepanov M, Christensen TR (2005) Species-specific effects of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from wetlands. Biogeochemistry 75:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turekian KK (1968) Oceans. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepraskas MJ (2002) Redox potential measurements. NC State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin CQ, Hefting MM (2006) Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Visser EJW, Colmer TD, Blom C, Voesenek L (2000) Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono- and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell and Environment 23:1237–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington JM, Roulet NT (1996) Atmosphere-wetland carbon exchanges: scale dependency of CO2 and CH4 exchange on the developmental topography of a peatland. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10:233–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wall LG, Tank JL, Royer TV, Bernot MJ (2005) Spatial and temporal variability in sediment denitrification within an agriculturally influenced reservoir. Biogeochemistry 76:85–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widdel F (1988) Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York, pp. 469–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder RK, Lang GE (1988) Cycling of inorganic and organic sulfur in peat from big run bog, West-Virginia. Biogeochemistry 5:221–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner A, Kuschk P, Stottmeister U (2002) Oxygen release by roots of Typha latifolia and Juncus effusus in laboratory hydroponic systems. Acta Biotechnologica 22:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn JG, Bird MI (2007) C4-derived soil organic carbon decomposes faster than its C3 counterpart in mixed C3/C4 soils. Global Change Biology 13:2206–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye S, Krauss KW, Brix H, Wei M, Olsson L, Yu X, Ma X, Wang J, Yuan H, Zhao G, Ding X, Moss RF (2016) Inter-annual variability of area-scaled gaseous carbon emissions from wetland soils in the Liaohe Delta, China. PLoS One 11:e0160612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by USGS Wetland and Aquatic Research Center through cooperative agreement G11 AC20358. We thank Rebecca F. Moss (Cherokee Nation Technologies) for analyzing the gas samples, and Rachel Huie at NC State University, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering for analyzing the pore water samples. We thank Jason Osborne at NC State University Department of Statistics for consulting on statistical analysis. Randall Etheridge, Magdlena Rabiipour, Bryan Maxwell, John Hutcherson, Ian Cader, Molly Mikan, Carolyn Currin, Nicole Cormier, and Rebecca F. Moss provided field assistance for chamber installation and/or gas sampling. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government or NC State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yo-Jin Shiau.

Ethics declarations

Peer Review DISCLAIMER

This draft manuscript is distributed solely for purposes of scientific peer review. Its content is deliberative and predecisional, so it must not be disclosed or released by reviewers. Because the manuscript has not yet been approved for publication by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), it does not represent any official USGS finding or policy.

Additional information

Data Archiving Statement

Raw data to support these interpretations are available upon request from the lead author (Y. Shiau, yshiau@ncsu.edu)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiau, YJ., Burchell, M.R., Krauss, K.W. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Created Brackish Marsh in Eastern North Carolina. Wetlands 36, 1009–1024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0815-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0815-y

Keywords

Navigation