Abstract
We have investigated the role of convective parameterization in simulations of heavy precipitation systems at grey-zone (2–10 km) resolutions using an approach similar to that used in “observing system simulation experiment”. Simulations with a 1-km grid serve as benchmark simulations. The impacts of convective parameterization at greyzone resolutions (i.e., 3, 6, and 9 km) are then investigated. This study considers two heavy precipitation systems including one associated with a mesoscale cyclone generated over the Shandong Peninsula on 24–25 July 1991, and the other associated with a cloud cluster occurred on 15–16 July 2009. The present study indicates that convective parameterization does not affect much the simulations of the two heavy precipitation systems with 3-km grid size. However, it significantly affects simulations for grid sizes of 6 and 9 km. Simulations with the Kain-Fritsch scheme produce deficiencies such as relatively small heavy rainfall area, smaller maximum precipitation rate, wider area of weak precipitation, etc. Simulations without convective parameterization have also some negative effects such as the overprediction of area-averaged precipitation rate and others. A modified trigger function in the Kain-Fritsch scheme is found to improve the simulations of the heavy precipitation systems over the Korean Peninsula by reducing excessive trigger of convection, especially for simulations with 6- and 9- km grids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present, and future. J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525.
_____, and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 674–701.
Betts, A. K., 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677–691.
Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394–2416.
Craig, G. C., and A. Dörnbrack, 2008: Entrainment in cumulus clouds: What resolution is cloud-resolving? J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3978–3988.
Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State-NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493–1513.
Emanuel, K. A., 1991: A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale model. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2313–2335.
Fritsch, J. M., and C. F. Chappell, 1980: Numerical prediction of convectively driven mesoscale pressure systems. Part I: Convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1722–1733.
Gerard, L., 2007: An integrated package for subgrid convection, clouds and precipitation compatible with meso-gamma scales. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 711–730.
_____, J. M. Piriou, R. Brožková, J. F. Geleyn, and D. Banciu, 2009: Cloud and precipitation parameterization in a meso-gamma-scale operational weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3960–3977.
Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764–787.
_____, J. Dudhia, and D. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the Fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 117 pp.
Hamill, T. M., 1999: Hypothesis tests for evaluating numerical precipitation forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 155–167.
Hong, S.-Y., 2004: Comparison of heavy rainfall mechanism in Korea and the Central U. S. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82(5), 1469–1479.
Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181.
_____, and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784–2802.
_____, and ______, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritsch scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165–170.
_____, and Coauthors, 2008: Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931–952.
Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471.
Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1232–1240.
Lee, M.-J., and D.-K. Lee, 2006: Effects of trigger function in the Kain-Fritsch cumulus parameterization scheme on heavy rainfall simulation. J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 397–410.
Lee, T.-Y., and Y.-H. Kim, 2007: Heavy precipitation systems over the Korean Peninsula and their classification. J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 43, 367–396.+
_____, C.-S. Shin, S.-H. Park, Y.-Y. Park and Y.-H. Kim, 2004: A cyclogenesis and heavy rainfalls over the Changma front. Intl. Conf. on Mesoscale Convective Systems IV, Beijing, China.
Liu, C.-H., M. W. Moncrieff, and W. W. Grabowski, 2001: Hierarchical modeling of tropical convective systems using explicit and parameterized approaches. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 493–515.
Ma, L.-M., and Z.-M. Tan, 2009: Improving the behavior of the cumulus parameterization for tropical cyclone prediction: Convection trigger. Atmos. Res., 92, 190–211.
Molinari, J. M., and M. Dudek, 1992: Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 326–344.
Narita, M., and S. Ohmori, 2007: Improving precipitation forecasts by the operational nonhydrostatic mesoscale model with the Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization and cloud microphysics. Preprints, 12th Conf on Mesoscale Process, Watervillle Valley, NH, CD-ROM, 3.7.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), 2006: NCEP FNL operational model global tropospheric analyses, continuing from July 1999. [Available online at http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2/.]
Petch, J. C., A. R. Brown, and M. E. B. Gray, 2002: The impact of horizontal resolution on the simulations of convective development over land. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2031–2044.
Reisner, J., R. J. Rasmussen, and R. T. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124B, 1071–1107.
Saito, K., and Coauthors, 2006: The operational JMA nonhydrostatic mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1266–1298.
Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2009: Next-day convection-allowing WRF model guidance: A second look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3351–3372.
Thompson, G., R. M. Rasmussen, and K. Manning, 2004: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: description and sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 519–542.
Warner, T. T., and H.-M. Hsu, 2000: Nested-model simulation of moist convection: The impact of coarse-grid parameterized convection on fine-grid resolved convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2211–2231.
Weisman, M. L., W. C. Skamarock, and J. B. Klemp, 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 527–548.
Yang, M.-J., and Q.-C. Tung, 2003: Evaluation of rainfall forecasts over Taiwan by four cumulus parameterization schemes. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 81, 1163–1183.
Yu, X., and T.-Y. Lee, 2010: Role of convective parameterization in simulations of a convection band at grey-zone resolutions. Tellus A, 62, 617–632.
Zhang, D.-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer-sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 1594–1609.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, X., Lee, TY. Role of convective parameterization in simulations of heavy precipitation systems at grey-zone resolutions — case studies. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 47, 99–112 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0001-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0001-3