Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneurial Knowledge and Digital Competence: Keys for a Success of Student Entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding forces that contribute to the birth of student entrepreneurship is very important, as the entrepreneurial attitude grows in a young student. Economists consider this type of entrepreneurship as a significant drive towards improving societal welfare, while experts of communication emphasize the inclination to entrepreneurial skills and innovation of this generation of entrepreneurs. Other studies have explored student entrepreneurs’ ability to build inter-organizational relationships. Despite this entrepreneurial spirit, increasingly seen as a source of innovation in nearly all industries, knowledge is limited on how student entrepreneurship leads to the birth of new enterprises and the renewal of established organizations. Several authors of management studies have shown how higher education and training programs foster student entrepreneurship. No major study to date, however, has taken into consideration other factors, such as digital competence and informal collaborative networks, and assessed their respective influence on students’ attitudes to starting a new business. This paper examines the available data provided by Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2011) concerning student entrepreneurship in 40 countries across the world in order to evaluate the influence of these factors, using a PLS-Path Modeling analysis. The findings show that entrepreneurial knowledge is the most important factor in promoting student entrepreneurship, although the presence of informal collaborative networks and the ability to efficiently use the latest technology are also relevant in developing entrepreneurship attitude. The low technological capacity results for student entrepreneurship among the generation of native digital population is confirmation alone on the current importance of reconsidering the development of digital competence in higher education that goes beyond the simple training of technical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2006, the European parliament recognized the digital competence as a key competence for lifelong learning and provided implementation guidelines for the education system (EC 2006).

References

  • Axelsson, K. (1995). Realization of a decentralized IS-strategy. In A. Solvberg, J. Krogstie, & A. H. Seltveit (Eds.), Information systems development for decentralized organizations (pp. 168–183). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73–84). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, V., Filippaios, F., & Morgan, S. (2010). Online social networks. Changing the face of business education and career planning. International Journal of E-Business Management, 4(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Data analysis by partial least squares. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing digital competence in secondary education. Issues, models and instruments. In M. Leaning (Ed.), Issues in information and media literacy: Education, practice and pedagogy (pp. 153–172). Santa Rosa: Informing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2010). La competenza digitale nella scuola. Modelli e strumenti per valutarla e svilupparla. Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the USA. Technovation, 23, 757–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., & Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, R., & Barbato, R. (2002). An analysis of the motivational factors of intending entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 13(2), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denicolai, S., Cioccarelli, G., & Zucchella, A. (2010). Resource-based local development and networked core-competencies for tourism excellence. Tourism Management, 31(2), 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentchev, N. A., & Heene, A. (2003). Reputation management: sending the right signal to the right stakeholder. Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Management and Organization, Working Paper, April 2003, 2003/175, Hoveniersberg 24 B–9000 Gent.

  • Dutta, S., & Fraser, M. (2009). When job seekers invade Facebook. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983). A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. The American Statistician, 37(1), 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends: exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning, 2006/962/EC, L. 394/15. http://eur-lex.uropa.eu/LexUriServ.do?url-OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF. Accessed 10 June 2012.

  • Fayolle, A., & Kickul, J. (2007). New and emerging perspectives for future research in entrepreneurship education. In A. Fayolle (Ed.), Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education. Vol. 2 Contextual perspectives (pp. 1–10). Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, J., Karri, R., & Rossiter, N. (2007). Fostering Entrepreneurial Drive in business Education: an attitudinal Approach. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasse, Y., & Tremblay, M. (2006). Entrepreneurship education among students at a Canadian university: an extensive empirical study of students’ entrepreneurial preferences and intentions. In Gibb A. A. (2007), Enterprise in education (pp. 1–19) educating tomorrow’s entrepreneurs, Pentti Mankinen. http://www.enorssi.fi/hankkeet/yrittajyyskasvatus/pdf/Gibb.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2012.

  • Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., & Pruett, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: differences among American, Asian and European students. International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 7, 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. (2007). Enterprise in education. Educating tomorrow’s entrepreneurs, Pentti Mankinen. http://www.enorssi.fi/hankkeet/yrittajyyskasvatus/pdf/Gibb.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2012.

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part II. Education and Training, 47(3), 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, L., & Robinson, R. (1993). A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics of venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8C, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2006). Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivona V. R., & Želimir, D. (2011). University student entrepreneurial characteristics: key for the future development. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference: Challenges of Europe: Growth and competitiveness—Reversing the Trends, (pp. 855–863) Split-Bol.

  • Keamey, P. (1999). Enterprising ways to teach & learn. Book. Enterprise principles. West Hobart: Enterprise Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korunka, C., Frank, H., Lueger, M., & Mugler, J. (2003). The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the start up process—a configurationally approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourilsky, M. L., & Walstad, W. B. (1998). Entrepreneurship and female youth: knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrö, P. (2006). The continental and Anglo-American approaches to entrepreneurship education—differences and bridges. In A. Fayolle & H. Klandt (Eds.), International entrepreneurship education, issues and newness (pp. 93–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P., Hunt, J., & Farris, J. (2011). Innovative teaching to engage and challenge twenty-first century entrepreneurship student. An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 14, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Are digital natives really digitally competent? A study on Chinese teenagers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1029–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lissy, D. (2000). Goodbye b-school. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmoller, J. B. (1984). LVPLS program manual version 1.6: Latent variable path analysis with partial least-squares estimation. Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung, Universitst zu Koln.

  • Mars, M. M. (2009). Student entrepreneurs as agents of organizational change and social transformation: a grassroots leadership perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MartÍnez, A. C., Levie, J., Kelley, D. J., SÆmundsson, R. J., & SchØtt, T. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor: A global perspective on 410 entrepreneurship education and training. Wellesley: Babson College.

  • Mcmullan, W. E., & Long, W. A. (1987). Entrepreneurship education in the nineties. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. Y., Katsiyannis, A., Bradley, R., & Rozalski, M. E. (2000). Ensuring compliance with discipline provisions of IDEA ‘97: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 13, 204–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. L. (2002). Changing classes: the entrepreneurial spirit hasn’t died on business school campuses; but it has changed. Wall Street Journal, R8.

  • Morellato, M. (2000). Una piattaforma di sviluppo di agenti software mobile per l’integrazione di Internet e la Domotica. Doctor Magistrale, Università degli Studi di Milano.

  • Morellato, M. (2012). Reputational capital and Olympic events: A case study of Whistler Live! Università degli Studi di Milano–Bicocca.

  • Oganisjana, K., & Koke, T. (2012). Does competence-oriented higher education lead to students’ competitiveness? Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 23(1), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, M., Do, P. A., & Ferreira, J. (2008). Entrepreneur’s profile: a taxonomy of attributes and motivations of university students. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. T., Duffy, S., & Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: a nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal Entrepreneur Education, 1(1), 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K. H., & Gartner, W. B. (2000). University entrepreneurship programs-1999, Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction–cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1983). Soft modeling: The basic design, and some extensions. In K. G. Joreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics ISTEI, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

    Veronica Scuotto & Massimo Morellato

Authors
  1. Veronica Scuotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Morellato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Scuotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scuotto, V., Morellato, M. Entrepreneurial Knowledge and Digital Competence: Keys for a Success of Student Entrepreneurship. J Knowl Econ 4, 293–303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0155-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0155-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation