Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Governance of Synergies and Conflicts in Project Management: The Case of IPA Project RecoURB

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, public and private organisations have carried out international cooperation projects that contributed in a relevant way to the development of local systems in transition countries, thereby increasing the interests of scientific communities, project managers, and entrepreneurs through the experiences derived from these initiatives. This paper analyses and discusses the role of synergies and conflicts in the governance of projects. It outlines the results of the research on RecoURB project, which was submitted within the Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme IPA. This case study represents an example of project planning in which governance manages the network of stakeholders. Among the project stakeholders, the interests of each unit can produce either a state of conflict or synergy. The hypothesis of this paper is that whether there is a state of conflict or synergy depends on the connections among units in previous projects. Furthermore, the tension between the two potential states of synergy or conflict in itself pushes systems towards increasing complexity within the governance model and can also produce the organisational resources needed for concluding the project. That is, the ‘conflict of interests’ among project stakeholders leads to adequate, effective, and efficient coordination, as can be seen, for example, in the network and in the use of ICTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/.

  2. http://ec.europa.eu.

  3. http://www.adriaticipacbc.org/.

  4. Usually, the period between the publication of the call for proposals and the date of submission deadline is about 3 months.

References

  1. Achterkamp MC, Vos JFJ (2008) Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. Int J Proj Manag 26:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bianchi M, Tampieri L (eds) (2005) Life long learning and managerial development in transition countries. Il Ponte Vecchio, Cesena

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi M (2005) Cluster analysis or NewBuC? Some lessons from projects of SMES creation in transition countries. In: Bianchi M, Tampieri L (eds) Life long learning and managerial development in transition countries. Il Ponte Vecchio, Cesena, pp 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchi M (2001) L’impatto degli hyperlink sulla logistica organizzativa. Problemi di struttura e processo nella rilevazione delle nuove configurazioni organizzative. Sinergie, 56

  5. Bianchi M (1974) L’analisi matriciale quale strumento di razionalizzazione del sistema socio tecnico d’impresa. Poligrafico Artioli, Modena

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blodgett JG, Lu L, Rose GM, Vitell SJ (2001) Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: a cross-cultural comparison. J Acad Mark Sci 29(2):190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bounds G (1998) Last word on project management. IEE Solut 30(11):41–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z (2000) Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan 15(3):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2009) ‘Mode 3 and ‘quadruple helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag 46(3–4):201–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) “Mode3”: meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspectives. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Greenwood Publishing Group, USA, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ciborra C (2002) The labyrinths of information. Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deng ZM, Li H, Tam CM, Shem QP, Love PED (2001) An application of the internet-based project management system. Autom Constr 10(2):293–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Etzkowitz H (2003) Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Soc Sci Inf 42:293–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deprez FL, Tissen R (2002) Zerospace. Moving beyond organizational limits. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghauri P (1995) New structures in MNCs based in small countries: a network approach. In: Ghauri PN, Prasad SB (eds) International management: a reader. Dryden Press, London, pp 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  16. George G, Wood DR, Khan R (2001) Networking strategy of boards: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises. Entrep Reg Dev 13(3):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22(2):125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hossain L, Wu A (2009) Communications network centrality correlates to organisational coordination. Int J Proj Manag 27:795–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huggins R, Johnston A, Steffenson R (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1(2):321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilic KC, Keles C (2009) The business challenges of entrepreneurship in transition economies. ICES proceedings. Epoka University Publication, Albania, pp 293–318

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jawahar IM, McLaughlin GL (2001) Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad Manag Rev 26(3):397–414

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lazer D, Friedman A (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Adm Sci Q 52:667–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meneguzzo M, Cepiku D (eds) (2008) Network pubblici: strategia, struttura e governance. McGraw Hill, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  24. Micelli S, De Maria E (2002) Dalla new economy al networking, imprenditorialità nell’economia delle reti, economia e società regionale. Oltre Il Ponte 20(3):24–45

    Google Scholar 

  25. Odlyzko A, Tilly B (2005) A refutation of Metcalfe’s law and a better estimate for the value of networks and network interconnections. Preliminary version, March 2, 2005. Resource document. http://www.dtc.umn.edu/»odlyzko

  26. Pilati M, Tosi HL (2002) Comportamento organizzativo. EGEA, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scott SG, Lane VR (2000) A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):43–62

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schoonmaker MG, Carayannis EG (2010) Assessing the value of regional innovation networks. J Knowl Econ 1:48–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seckinelgin H (2005) Challenges of managing multiple interests: reflections on project management in Russia. In: Bianchi M, Tampieri L (eds) Life long learning and managerial development in transition countries. Il Ponte Vecchio, Cesena, pp 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tampieri L (2009a) The international project management for the Reform of Higher Education in transition countries. Some experiences from the University of Bologna. In: Pevcin P, Setnikar Cankar S (eds) Symposium proceedings—Third International Symposium on the Development of Public Administration in Southeast Europe. Ljubljana University, Ljubljana, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tampieri L (2009b) The decentralized cooperation and the role of universities in local systems. The case of SVILOPIM project. Proceedings economics faculty as contributor to economic development of communities, Camaj Pipa, Albania, pp 155–169

  32. Tampieri L, Zaric S (2007) Improving intangible assets through project management in transition countries. In: Stojan Babić S, Cerović B, Jakšić M, Praščević A (eds) Challenges of globalization and transition. Proceedings of Contemporary Challenge of Theory and Practice in Economics. University of Belgrado, Belgrado, pp 417–427

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vinten G (2001) Shareholder versus stakeholder—is there a governance dilemma ? Corp Gov 9(1):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Westland J (2006) The project management life cycle. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forlì Faculty of Economics, University of Bologna, Piazzale della Vittoria, 15, 47121, Forlì (FC), Italy

    Laura Tampieri

Authors
  1. Laura Tampieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Tampieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tampieri, L. The Governance of Synergies and Conflicts in Project Management: The Case of IPA Project RecoURB. J Knowl Econ 4, 370–386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0074-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0074-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation