Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genotype-by-trait association of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) advanced lines grown under arid and semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inadequate information is available on trait relations and profiles of sorghum genotypes, yet this information is vital for precise decisions to be undertaken in breeding programs. Here, 17 sorghum experimental lines were evaluated together with three checks at five locations, representing the major sorghum production environments in Zimbabwe. Across site analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant genotypic effects on grain yield (GYD) as well as the other traits, including panicle length (PL) and stem diameter (SD). Distance-based clustering indicated the possibility of indirectly selecting for GYD using; SD, exertion (EXSTN), panicle length (PL), panicle width (PW) and number of leaves (NL). In addition, the vector view of the genotype-by-trait (GT) biplot also revealed strong correlations between GYD and, PW, SD and FYD, as well as the other physiological traits including, days to male flowering (DMA) and days to physiological maturity (DPM). Genotypes superior for a combination of traits were, G6, G7, G11, G18 and G20, which were strong for GYD, PL and PW, as well as, G5 which was strong for sugar content (SC), number of leaves (NL) and SD. Genotypes 15, 16 and 17, were specifically strong for GYD whereas, genotypes 4 and 9 were strong for FYD. Overall, results revealed the key traits which can be considered singularly or in combination, when selecting suitable sorghum genotypes, either for feed or food purposes, under arid and semi-arid conditions. This information is vital for decision making in sorghum breeding programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajeigbe HA, Folorunso MA, Ayuba K, Jerome J (2018) Productivity and water use efficiency of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] grown under different nitrogen applications in Sudan Savanna Zone. Int J Agron 76(760):58

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam S, Ali A, Qamar I, Arshad M, Sheikh S (2001) Correlation of economically important traits in Sorghum bicolor varieties. Online J Biol Sci 1:330–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali HI, Mahmoud KM, Amir AA (2012) Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in grain sorghum population. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 12:414–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado G, López M, Vargas M, Pacheco Á, Rodríguez F, Burgueño J, Crossa J (2015) META-R (Multi Environment Trail Analysis with R for Windows) Version 5.0. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. https://data.cimmyt.org/dataverse/cimmytswdvn.

  • Amare K, Zeleke H, Bultosa G, Ambo I (2015) Variability for yield, yield related traits and association among traits of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties in Wollo, Ethiopia. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 7(5):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Harzic N, Carroni AM (2010) Adaptation, diversity, and exploitation of global white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landrace genetic resources. Field Crops Res 119:114–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari H, Bhanu A, Srivastava K, Singh M, Shreya HA (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants-an overview. Adv Plants Agric Res 7:00255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosire E, Karanja F, Ouma G, Gitau W (2018) Assessment of climate change impact on sorghum production in Machakos County. Sustain Food Prod 3:25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanza N (2018) Limits to climate change adaptation in Zimbabwe: insights, experiences and lessons. Limits to climate change adaptation. Springer, Cham, pp 109–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg JA, Wilson JP, Synder T (2003) Alternative uses of sorghum and pearl millet in Asia. In Proceedings of an expert meeting, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1–4.

  • De Mendiburu F, Reinhard S (2015) Agricolae-Ten years of an open source statistical tool for experiments in breeding, agriculture and biology. No. e1748. PeerJ PrePrints.

  • Dolatabad S, Choukan R, Majidi HE, Dehghani H (2010) Multi-environment analysis of traits relation and hybrids comparison of maize based on the genotype by trait Biplot. Americ J Agric Biol Sci 5(1):107–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube T, Mlilo C, Moyo P, Ncube C, Phiri K (2018) Will adaptation carry the future? Questioning the long-term capacity of smallholder farmers’ adaptation strategies against climate change in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe. J Hum Ecol 61:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzat EM, Ali MA, Mahmoud AM (2010) Agronomic performance, genotype × environment interactions and stability analysis of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Asian J Crop Sci 2(4):250–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulgueira CL, Amigot SL, Gaggiotti M, Romero LA, Basílico JC (2007) Forage quality: techniques for testing. Fresh Prod 1:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JR, Burks PS, Staggenborg SA, Odvody GN, Heiniger RW, Macoon B, Moore KJ, Barrett M, Rooney WL (2014) Yield results and stability analysis from the sorghum regional biomass feedstock trial. Bioenergy Res 7:1026–1034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Yang X, Zhou H, Luo X, Qin P, Li J, Ren G (2017) Comparison of nutritional composition, aroma compounds, and biological activities of two kinds of tartary buck wheat tea. J Food Sci 82(7):1735–1741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadebe ST, Modi AT, Mabhaudhi T (2017) Drought tolerance and water use of cereal crops: a focus on sorghum as a food security crop in sub-Saharan Africa. J Agron Crop Sci 203:177–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer GL, McLean G, Chapman S, Zheng B, Doherty A, Harrison MT, van Oosterom E, Jordan D (2014) Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dry land production environments. Crop Pasture Sci 65:614–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Mohammed MI, Yagoub SO (2015) Breeding for dual purpose attributes in sorghum: effect of harvest option and genotype on fodder and grain yields. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 7:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Holme IB, Gregersen PL, Brinch-Pedersen H (2019) Induced genetic variation in crop plants by random or targeted mutagenesis: convergence and differences. Front Plant Sci 10.

  • Hunt C, Hayes B, Eeuwijk F, Mace E, Jordan D (2020) Multi-environment analysis of sorghum breeding trials using additive and dominance genomic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 133(3):1009–1018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimmy ML, Nzuve O, Flourence O, Manyasa E, Muthomi J (2017) Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and trait correlations in selected sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varieties. Int J Agron Agric Res 11(5):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Malosetti M, Ribaut JM, van Eeuwijk A (2013) The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front Physiol 4:44

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mare M, Manjeru P, Ncube B, Sisito G (2017) GGE biplot analysis of genotypes by environment interaction on Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench) in Zimbabwe. Afr J Plant Sci 11(7):308–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel S, Löschenberger F, Ametz C, Pachler B, Sparry E, Bürstmayr H (2019) Simultaneous selection for grain yield and protein content in genomics-assisted wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet 132:1745–1760

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mugandani R, Wuta M, Makarau A, Chipindu B (2012) Re-classification of agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe inconformity with climate variability and change. Afr Crop Sci J 20(2):361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundia CW, Secchi S, Akamani K, Wang G (2019) A regional comparison of factors affecting global sorghum production: the case of North America, Asia and Africa’s Sahel. Sustainability 11(7):2135

    Google Scholar 

  • Murungweni C, Van Wijk M, Smaling E, Giller K (2016) Climate-smart crop production in semi-arid areas through increased knowledge of varieties, environment and management factors. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 105:183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Musvosvi C, Setimela PS, Wali MC, Gasura E, Channappagoudar BB, Patil SS (2018) Contribution of secondary traits for high grain yield and stability of tropical maize germplasm across drought stress and non-stress conditions. Agron J 110(3):819–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Ncube B, Twomlow S, Van Wijk M, Dimes J, Giller K (2007) Productivity and residual benefits of grain legumes to sorghum under semi-arid conditions in southwestern Zimbabwe. Plant Soil 299:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowosad K, Liersch A, Popławska W, Bocianowski J (2016) Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica 208:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Oluwaranti A, Fakorede M, Badu-Apraku B (2008) Grain yield of maize varieties of different maturity groups under marginal rainfall conditions. J Agric Sci 53:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil M, Lokesha R (2018) Estimation of genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, correlations and path analysis in advanced mutant breeding lines of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J Pharmacogn Nat Prod 4:151

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne R, Murray D, Harding S, Baird D, Soutar D (2009) GenStat for windows introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  • Phiri KT, Dube P, Moyo C, Ncube S, Ndlovu G, Buchenrieder. (2019) Small grains “resistance”? Making sense of Zimbabwean smallholder farmers’ cropping choices and patterns within a climate change context. Cogent Soc Sci 5(1):1622485

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramburan S, Dlamini N, Labuschagne M (2018) Genotype × environment interactions and optimum resource allocation for sugarcane yield trials in Swaziland. J Crop Improv 32(4):441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VT, Bharathi D, Mohan C, Venkanna V, Bhadru D (2013) Genetic variability and association analysis in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Crop Res 46:122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincent R, Kuhn E, Monod H (2017) Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models. Theor Appl Genet 130:1735–1752

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio J, Cubero JI, Martin LM, Suso MJ, Flores F (2004) Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukuni M, Tawonezvi P, Eicher CK, Matondi PB, Bedingfield M (2015) Zimbabwe’s agricultural revolution revisited. University of Zimbabwe Publications, Harare, pp 119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim ERA, El Aziz Ahmed WA, Mohamed MA (2017) Fortified sorghum as a potential for food security in rural areas by adaptation of technology and innovation in Sudan. J Food Nutr Popul Health 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Sipocz J, Kaszas I, Szakacs G, Gyepes A, Tengerdy R (1997) Preservation of sugar content in ensiled sweet sorghum. Bioresour Technol 60:9–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi P, Ebadi A (2018) Relationships of rice yield and quality based on genotype by trait (GT) biplot. An Acad Bras Ciênc 1:343–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Shegro A, van Rensburg WJ, Adebola PO (2013) Assessment of genetic variability in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L. Verdc.) using morphological quantitative traits. Acad J Agric Res 1(3):045–051

    Google Scholar 

  • Tack J, Lingenfelser J, Jagadish SK (2017) Disaggregating sorghum yield reductions under warming scenarios exposes narrow genetic diversity in US breeding programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(35):9296–9301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tari I, Laskay G, Takacs Z, Poor P (2013) Response of sorghum to abiotic stresses: a review. J Agron Crop Sci 199:264–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsusaka TW, Msere HW, KeeTui SH, Orr A, Ndolo P (2015) Sorghum in semi-arid subsistence agriculture: the case of central Mozambique. Socioeconomics Discussion Paper Series 33.

  • Ubi EB, Mignouna H, Obigbesan G (2001) Segregation for seed weight, pod length and days to flowering following cowpea cross. Afr Crop Sci J 9(3):463–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hunt C, Cruickshank A, Mace E, Hammer G, Jordan C (2020) The impacts of flowering time and tillering on grain yield of sorghum hybrids across diverse environments. Agron 10(1):135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Huber W, Liaw A, Lumley T, Maechler M, Magnusson A, Moeller S, Schwartz M (2009) gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R Package Version 2(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Zhang P, Warner RD, Fang Z (2019) Sorghum grain: from genotype, nutrition, and phenolic profile to its health benefits and food applications. Compr Rev Food Sci 18(6):2025–2046

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J (2008) Breeding line selection based on multiple traits. Crop Sci 48:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Holland JB (2010) Heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica 171:355–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS (2003) GGE-biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders. Geneticists and agronomists. CRD Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42(1):11–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZY, Che P, Glassman K, Albertsen M (2019) Nutritionally enhanced sorghum for the arid and semiarid tropical areas of Africa. In Sorghum. Humana Press, New York, pp 197–207

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the support which they received from the Sorghum and Millets Research Unit of the Crop Breeding Institute, which is under the Department of Research & Specialist Services of Zimbabwe for help in trial management and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casper Nyaradzai Kamutando.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12892_2020_60_MOESM1_ESM.csv

Turkey HSD mean comparisons for agronomic traits measured in experimental sorghum lines evaluated under arid and semi-arid conditions during the 2018–2019 rainy season in Zimbabwe (CSV 3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukondwa, O., Manjeru, P., Ngirazi, S. et al. Genotype-by-trait association of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) advanced lines grown under arid and semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 24, 71–81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00060-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00060-7

Keywords

Navigation