Abstract
Objectives
Understanding other people’s thoughts and feelings is important for successful relationships. The current study examined potential benefits and pitfalls of experience similarity and mindful awareness in relation to accurate interpersonal understanding.
Methods
Participants (n = 77) watched a video of a speaker sharing a real-life story, rated the speaker’s emotions throughout the story, and recalled factual details of the story. Measures of accuracy included factual accuracy when recalling facts about the story and empathic accuracy in understanding the speaker’s feelings. Participants also indicated whether they did or did not have experiences in the past that were similar to the ones from the speaker’s video, and self-reported their levels of mindful attention and awareness.
Results
Having, compared to not having, a similar past life experience was associated with lower factual and empathic accuracy. Individuals with higher mindful attention and awareness were more likely to show higher empathic accuracy, being able to more accurately infer the speaker’s emotions throughout the story. This relationship was driven most strongly by individuals who did not have similar past experience as the speaker, such that mindfulness was associated with higher empathic accuracy only among individuals with no similar past experiences.
Conclusions
Experience similarity may diminish the benefit of mindfulness on the ability to accurately infer the target’s mental states. Considering potential pitfalls and biases that may hinder accurate interpersonal understanding can help provide skillful support that is most suited to the needs of specific individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Study protocols, survey measures, data, analysis scripts, and output statistics reported in this manuscript are available in https://github.com/cnlab/accuracy/. Please see [SI4] for a positionality statement.
References
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
Auyeung, K., & Alden, L. E. (2020). Accurate empathy, social rejection, and social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619885410.
Auyeung, K. W., & Alden, L. E. (2016). Social anxiety and empathy for social pain. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9718-0.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107313003.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963001006643.
Batson, C. D., Sympson, S. C., Hindman, J. L., Decruz, P., Matthew Todd, R., Weeks, J. L., Jennings, G., & Burns, C. T. (1996). “I’ve been there, too”: Effect on empathy of prior experience with a need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225005.
Berry, D. R., Hoerr, J. P., Cesko, S., Alayoubi, A., Carpio, K., Zirzow, H., Walters, W., Scram, G., Rodriguez, K., & Beaver, V. (2020). Does mindfulness training without explicit ethics-based instruction promote prosocial behaviors? A meta-analysis. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1247–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219900418.
Brown, K. W., Goodman, R. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Dispositional mindfulness and the attenuation of neural responses to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss004.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1232–1254.
Choy, T., Baker, E., & Stavropoulos, K. (2021). Systemic racism in EEG research: Considerations and potential solutions. Affective Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00050-0.
Damen, D., Pollmann, M., & Grassow, T.-L. (2021a). The benefits and obstacles to perspective getting. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.611187.
Damen, D., van Amelsvoort, M., van der Wijst, P., Pollmann, M., & Krahmer, E. (2021b). Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(6), 1054–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080.
Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis: An Annual Publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, 26(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12.
Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Duineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W. B., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12338.
Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000115.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45.
Frith, U. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism. Neuron, 32(6), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00552-9.
Gadassi, R., Mor, N., & Rafaeli, E. (2011). Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: An interpersonal model of gender differences in depression. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611414728.
Gerace, A., Day, A., Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2015). Perspective taking and empathy: Does having similar past experience to another person make it easier to take their perspective? Journal of Relationships Research, 6, e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2015.6.
Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 7(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.57.
Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209350326.
Hofelich Mohr, A., Kross, E., & Preston, S. D. (2016). Devil in the details: Effects of depression on the prosocial response depend on timing and similarity. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 2(4), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0044-x.
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.730.
Johnston, L., Miles, L., & McKinlay, A. (2008). A critical review of the eyes test as a measure of social-cognitive impairment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701449521.
Jospe, K., Genzer, S., Klein Selle, N., Ong, D., Zaki, J., & Perry, A. (2020). The contribution of linguistic and visual cues to physiological synchrony and empathic accuracy. Cortex, 132, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.001.
Kang, Y. (2018). Examining interpersonal self-transcendence as a potential mechanism linking meditation and social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.007.
Kang, Y., Gruber, J., & Gray, J. R. (2012). Mindfulness and de-automatization. Emotion Review: Journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion, 5(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451629.
Kang, Y., Gruber, J., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Deautomatization of cognitive and emotional life. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness, 1, 168.
Koudenburg, N. (2018). Regulating shared reality with micro-dynamics in the form of conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.002.
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 81–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002.
Lim, D., Condon, P., & DeSteno, D. (2015). Mindfulness and compassion: An examination of mechanism and scalability. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118221.
Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness, 9(3), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8.
Lutz, A., Jha, A. P., Dunne, J. D., & Saron, C. D. (2015). Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices from a neurocognitive perspective. American Psychologist, 70(7), 632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039585.
Mesmer-Magnus, J., Manapragada, A., Viswesvaran, C., & Allen, J. W. (2017). Trait mindfulness at work: A meta-analysis of the personal and professional correlates of trait mindfulness. Human Performance, 30(2–3), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1307842.
Mitchell, S. M. L., Lange, S., & Brus, H. (2013). Gendered citation patterns in international relations. International Studies Perspectives: Special Issue Feminism in International Relations, 14(4), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12026.
Morrison, A. S., Mateen, M. A., Brozovich, F. A., Zaki, J., Goldin, P. R., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Changes in empathy mediate the effects of cognitive-behavioral group therapy but not mindfulness-based stress reduction for social anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 50(6), 1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.005.
Papp, L. M., Kouros, C. D., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Emotions in marital conflict interactions: Empathic accuracy, assumed similarity, and the moderating context of depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348810.
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017.
Pollmann, M. M. H., & Finkenauer, C. (2009). Investigating the role of two types of understanding in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1512–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209342754.
Prevost, M., Carrier, M.-E., Chowne, G., Zelkowitz, P., Joseph, L., & Gold, I. (2014). The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test: Validation of a French version and exploration of cultural variations in a multi-ethnic city. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 19(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2013.823859.
Ridderinkhof, A., de Bruin, E. I., Brummelman, E., & Bögels, S. M. (2017). Does mindfulness meditation increase empathy? An experiment. Self and Identity: The Journal of the International Society for Self and Identity, 16(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1269667.
Ruttan, R. L., McDonnell, M.-H., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). Having “been there” doesn’t mean I care: When prior experience reduces compassion for emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 610. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000012.
Schroeder, J. W. (2004). Skillful means: The heart of Buddhist compassion. Motilal Banarsidass Publishing House.
Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320.
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20237.
Simpson, J. A., Orina, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881.
Simpson, J. A., Kim, J. S., Fillo, J., Ickes, W., Steven Rholes, W., MindaOriña, M., & Winterheld, H. A. (2011). Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210394368.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.
Tan, L. B. G., Lo, B. C. Y., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Brief mindfulness meditation improves mental state attribution and empathizing. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e110510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110510.
Ṭhānissaro, B. (1996). The wings to awakening - An anthology from the Pali Canon. Barre: Dhamma Dana. http://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Wings-to-Awakening-An-Anthology-from-the-Pali-Canon.pdf.
Tipsord, J. M. (2009). The effects of mindfulness training and individual differences in mindfulness on social perception and empathy. University of Oregon.
Treem, J. W., Leonardi, P. M., & van den Hooff, B. (2020). Computer-mediated communication in the age of communication visibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz024.
van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Bartholomaeus, J., Kopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w.
Winning, A. P., & Boag, S. (2015). Does brief mindfulness training increase empathy? The role of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.011.
Zaki, J., Weber, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. (2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27), 11382–11387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902666106.
Zhou, D., Cornblath, E. J., Stiso, J., Teich, E. G., Dworkin, J. D., Blevins, A. S., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). Gender diversity statement and code notebook v1.0. https://github.com/dalejn/cleanBib.
Acknowledgements
We thank Golnoosh Mahdavi, José Carreras-Tartak, Kamilla Yunusova, Ana Acevedo, and Olivia Diong for research assistance. This work was supported by Mind and Life Institute (to Y.K.) and Hopelab (to Y.K. and E.B.F.). E.B.F. also acknowledges support from ARO W911NF1810244. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the views of the funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YK: designed and executed the study, analyzed data, wrote the paper, and oversaw the project. MEC: executed the study and edited the paper. KS: designed and executed the study and analyzed data. MBO: designed the study and analyzed data. EBF: designed the study, wrote the paper, and oversaw the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Statement
This study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent Statement
All participants provided informed consent.
Conflict of Interest
Emily Falk, Ph.D., is on the scientific advisory board for Kumanu, a digital well-being company, and has consulted for Google in the past year. The rest of the authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Citation Diversity Statement
Recent work in several fields has identified a bias in citation practices such that papers from women and other minority scholars are under-cited relative to the number of such papers in the field (Dion et al., 2018; Mitchell et al., 2013). Here we sought to consider choosing references that reflect the diversity of the field in thought, form of contribution, gender, and other factors. We obtained the predicted gender of the first and last author of each reference by using databases that store the probability of a first name being carried by a woman (Zhou et al., 2020). By this measure (and excluding self-citations to the first and last authors of our current paper), our references contain 29.83% woman (first)/woman (last), 7.65% man/woman, 25.23% woman/man, and 37.29% man/man. This method is limited in that (a) names, pronouns, and social media profiles used to construct the databases may not, in every case, be indicative of gender identity and (b) it cannot account for intersex, non-binary, or transgender people.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, Y., Cakar, M.E., Shumaker, K. et al. Experience Similarity, Mindful Awareness, and Accurate Interpersonal Understanding. Mindfulness 14, 2443–2453 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01859-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01859-x