Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Nonattachment Scale (NAS) and Its Relationship with Mindfulness, Decentering, and Mental Health

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonattachment is a Buddhism-rooted construct, which can be defined as the relative absence of fixation on ideas, images, or sensory objects, as well as an absence of internal pressure to get, hold, avoid, or change circumstances or experiences. The present study was aimed at exploring the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Nonattachment Scale (NAS) and at delimitating the relationship between the NAS and measures of mindfulness, decentering, and negative emotional symptoms. Pooling the NAS data from Spanish meditators (n = 335) and nonmeditators (n = 270), we performed an exploratory factor analysis and then estimated the fit of two competing models (one-factor model vs. one-factor model + method effects) via confirmatory factor analysis. Data analyses showed that the Spanish version of the NAS is unifactorial in nature and has excellent internal consistency. As expected, high (positive) significant correlations were found between NAS and mindfulness and decentering measures, as well as high significant (negative) relations between NAS and depression, anxiety, and stress scores. Positive relations were also observed between NAS and variables of meditation practice. Large differences among the meditative, nonmeditative, and clinical groups (n = 39 patients with borderline personality disorder) were observed regarding NAS scores. Scores on the NAS were significant predictors of negative emotional symptoms (depression, anxiety, and stress) and, especially, resilience. Furthermore, NAS provided a unique contribution in the regression models, going beyond mindfulness facets and decentering. In conclusion, the Spanish version of the NAS is a psychometrically sound instrument with a promising future in the field of mindfulness and meditation research and in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguado, J., Luciano, J. V., Cebolla, A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Soler, J., & García-Campayo, J. (2015). Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in non-clinical Spanish samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 404. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. G. (2012). Mentalizing in the Development and Treatment of Attachment Trauma. Karnac Books

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. doi:10.1177/1073191107313003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bados, A., Solanas, A., & Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema, 17, 679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: new developments and techniques (pp. 269–296). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrachina, J., Soler, J., Campins, M. J., Tejero, A., Pascual, J. C., Alvarez, E., et al. (2004). Validation of a Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview for Bordelines-Revised (DIB-R). Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 32, 293–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: first steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4(1), 18–32. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. doi:10.1080/10478400701598298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebolla, A., Garcia-Palacios, R., Soler, J., Guillen, V., Baños, R., & Botella, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). European Journal of Psychiatry, 26(2), 118–126. doi:10.4321/s0213-61632012000200005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197. doi:10.1177/1073191112446654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desbordes, G., Gard, T., Hoge, E. A., Hölzel, B. K., Kerr, C., Lazar, S. W., et al. (2015). Moving beyond mindfulness: defining equanimity as an outcome measure in meditation and contemplative research. Mindfulness, 6(2), 356–372. doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, A., Vine, V., Curtiss, J., & Klemanski, D. H. (2014). Observing nonreactively: a conditional process model linking mindfulness facets, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and depression and anxiety symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 165, 31–37. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532. doi:10.1037/a0015808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., van Dulmen, M. H., Segal, Z. V., Ma, S. H., Teasdale, J. D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2007a). Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behavior Therapy, 38(3), 234–246. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., & Kennedy, S. (2007b). Relationship of posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 447–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervás, G., & Jódar, R. (2008). Adaptación al castellano de la Escala de Dificultades en la Regulación Emocional. Clínica Y Salud, 19(2), 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichsenring, F., Leibing, E., Kruse, J., New, A. S., & Leweke, F. (2011). Borderline personality disorder. The Lancet, 377(9759), 74–84. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61422-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, W. D., & Martin, L. L. (1992). The cybernetics of happiness: the relation between goal attainment, rumination, and affect. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 222–146). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notario-Pacheco, B., Solera-Martínez, M., Serrano-Parra, M. D., Bartolomé-Gutiérrez, R., García-Campayo, J., & Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) in young adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 63. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, P., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Matthews, K. (2004). Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6, e29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahdra, B. K., Shaver, P. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). A scale to measure nonattachment: a Buddhist complement to Western research on attachment and adaptive functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(2), 116–127. doi:10.1080/00223890903425960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P. D., Marshall, S., & Heaven, P. (2015). Empathy and nonattachment independently predict peer nominations of prosocial behavior of adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 263. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soler, J., Cebolla, A., Feliu-Soler, A., Demarzo, M. M., Pascual, J. C., Baños, R., et al. (2014b). Relationship between meditative practice and self-reported mindfulness: the MINDSENS composite index. PloS one, 9(1). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086622

  • Soler, J., Franquesa, A., Feliu-Soler, A., Cebolla, A., García-Campayo, J., Tejedor, R., et al. (2014a). Assessing decentering: validation, psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Experiences Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 863–71. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanay, G., Lotan, G., & Bernstein, A. (2012). Salutary proximal processes and distal mood and anxiety vulnerability outcomes of mindfulness training: a pilot preventive intervention. Behavior therapy, 43(3), 492–505. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., Williams, S., & Segal, Z. V. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 275–287. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.2.275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. A. (2005). Genuine happiness: meditation as the path to fulfillment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychological Assessment, 2, 407–418. doi:10.1037/a0035566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: implications for confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28, 186–191. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-9004-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wupperman, P., Neumann, C. S., Whitman, J. B., & Axelrod, S. R. (2009). The role of mindfulness in borderline personality disorder features. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 197(10), 766–771. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b97343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was in part supported by CIBERSAM, CIBEROBN, REDIAPP (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, ISCIII; RD12/0005/0006 and RD12/0005/0008), and PROMOSAM (Red de Excelencia PSI2014-56303-REDT). We are also grateful to ISCIII for two grants for research projects on health (PI13/00134 and PI15/00383) that are co-financed with European Union ERDF funds. The third author (JVL) has a Miguel Servet contract awarded by the ISCIII (CP14/00087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan V. Luciano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feliu-Soler, A., Soler, J., Luciano, J.V. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Nonattachment Scale (NAS) and Its Relationship with Mindfulness, Decentering, and Mental Health. Mindfulness 7, 1156–1169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0558-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0558-0

Keywords

Navigation