Skip to main content
Log in

A research on the estimation of coefficient roughness in open channel applying entropy concept

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manning’s roughness coefficient is one of the most important parameters in establishing the plan, design, operation, and maintenance of the water resource projects for hydraulic engineers, and since the worth of this value has a significant effect on the analysis of the water level and flow rate distribution, it is very important to carry out the calculation of flood stage, design of the stream/river structure, and safety assessment of the stream. Due to the importance of these factors, the calculation of objective and quantitative roughness coefficient has long drawn attention from researchers at home and abroad. Many studies have been conducted to estimate the roughness coefficient based on the actual measurements for various types of streams, such as gravel and sand streams, and many others have produced experience equation for various levels of materials and relative depth. Despite many of these efforts, the roughness coefficient uses constant values when applied to the actual model or real design. This application is a major source of error in simulating flood and unsteady flow. To solve these problems, good results were obtained by attempting to calculate the roughness coefficient applied with the entropy concept in open-channel flow. In particular, the proposed roughness coefficient based on the measurements taken from laboratories under conditions showed very similar to the actual stream flow which was found to be about the same as the value from the unsteady flow. Accordingly, the newly developed roughness coefficient equation, which is the result of this study, is a very practical one formula that can be applied to the flood flow of real natural streams. It can also be used as an alternative to make up for the disadvantages of the Manning’s roughness coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayvaz MT (2013) A linked simulation–optimization model for simultaneously estimating the Manning’s surface roughness values and their parameter structures in shallow water flows. J Hydrol 500:183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes HH (1967) Roughness characteristics of natural channels. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1849, USGS

  • Butler T, Graham L, Estep D, Dawson C, Westerink JJ (2015) Definition and solution of a stochastic inverse problem for the Manning’s n parameter field in hydrodynamic models. Adv Water Resour 78:60–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calo VM, Collier N, Gehre M, Jin B, Radwan H, Santillana M (2013) Gradient-based estimation of Manning’s friction coefficient from noisy data. J Comput Appl Math 238:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CL (1988) Entropy and 2-D velocity distribution in open channels. J Hydraul Eng 114(7):738–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CL (1989) Velocity distribution in open channel flow. J Hydraulic Eng 115(5):576–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CL, Hsu SM (2006) Probabilistic approach to modeling of velocity distributions in fluid flows. J Hydrol 316(1):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 98–123

    Google Scholar 

  • De Doncker L, Troch P, Verhoeven R, Bal K, Meire P, Quintelier J (2009) Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river. Environ Fluid Mech 9(5):549–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest FB, Horace WK, James EL, Wei CY (1966) Handbook of hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 6.14–6.28

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco M, Mirauda D, Plantamura AV (2014) Manning’s roughness through the entropy parameter for steady open channel flows in low submergence. Procedia Eng 70:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed LK, Ali ST (2013) Estimating of Manning’s roughness coefficient for Hilla River through calibration using HEC-RAS model. Jordan J Civ Eng 7(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks DM, Mason PD (1991) Roughness characteristics of New Zealand Rivers: A handbook for assigning hydraulic roughness coefficients to river reaches by the"visual comparison” approach. Water Resources Survey

  • Limerinos JT. California. Dept. of Water Resources (1970) Determination of the Manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels

  • Mimi DS, Meenu D, Sreyashy C(2015) Unsteady resistance equations for proper prediction of high and moderate floods. IJIRSET 11(4)

  • Phillips JV, Ingersoll TL (1998) Verification of roughness coefficients for selected natural and constructed stream channels in Arizona (No. 1584). US Geological Survey; For sale by US Geological Survey Information Services [distributor]

  • Song T (1994) Velocity and turbulence distribution in non-uniform and unsteady open-channel flow. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, EPFL

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant [MOIS-DP-2015-05] through the Disaster and Safety Management Institute funded by Ministry of the Interior and Safety of Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tai Ho Choo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choo, Y.M., Yun, G.S. & Choo, T.H. A research on the estimation of coefficient roughness in open channel applying entropy concept. Environ Earth Sci 77, 624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7809-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7809-4

Keywords

Navigation