Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal distribution of groundwater monitoring wells near the river barrages of the 4MRRP using a numerical model and topographic analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project (4MRRP) was to mitigate flood damage by controlling surface water levels via the construction of large barrages along the main rivers of South Korea. The increase in surface water levels behind such barrages can lead to a rise in groundwater levels upstream, which may increase the likelihood of flooding after heavy rainfall or during non-pumping periods. A total of 900 groundwater monitoring sites, comprising 446 automatic and 454 manual stations, are proposed on the low-lying plains alongside the rivers based upon the following criteria: groundwater flow directions, topography (determined using GIS analysis), the desire for equal spacing of monitoring wells, economic efficiency, field accessibility, and cost. A numerical model (MODFLOW) is used to estimate future groundwater flow directions and the area likely to be affected by a rise in surface water levels after barrage construction. Since 2011, 137 automatic monitoring wells have been constructed, and recent time series data show that groundwater levels are closely linked to surface water levels, and increased rapidly for the first 1–2 years after barrage construction. Groundwater monitoring wells will be essential for assessing the depth to groundwater, forecasting the extent of any potential flooding, and developing countermeasures such as drainage system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MP (2005) Heat as a ground water tracer. Ground Water 43(6):951–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arumi JL, Rivera D, Holzapfel E, Boochs P, Billib M, Fernald A (2009) Effect of the irrigation canal network on surface and groundwater interactions in the lower valley of the Cachapoal River, Chile. Chil J Agric Res 69(1):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantz J, Stonestrom D, Stewart AE, Niswonger R, Smith TR (2001) Analysis of streambed temperatures in ephemeral channels to determine streamflow frequency and duration. Water Resour Res 37:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher J, Gunatilaka A (1998) Groundwater management system in Vienna—an evaluation after three years of operation. In: Peters J et al (eds) Artificial recharge of groundwater. Balkema, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons RD (1991) Statistical tolerance limits for groundwater monitoring. Ground Water 29:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenmos MR, Daughney CJ, Jackson BM, Morgenstern U (2011) Regional-scale identification of groundwater–surface water interaction using hydrochemistry and multivariate statistical methods, Wairarapa Valley, New Zealand. Hydro Earth Sys Sci Discuss 8:6443–6487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey FE, Lee DR, Rudolph DL, Frape SK (1997) Locating groundwater discharge in large lakes using bottom sediment electrical conductivity mapping. Water Resour Res 33:2609–2616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeo J 10:91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources. USGS Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 4, Chapter A3, USGS, Reston

  • Hlavatý Z, Banský L, Rodák D, Kučárova K (1999) Surface water, groundwater and soil moisture regime. In: Gabčikovo part of the hydroelectric power project environmental impact review. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

  • Hudak PF, Loaiciga HA, Schoolmaster FA (1993) Application of geographic information systems to groundwater monitoring network design. Water Resour Bull 29:383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jousma G (2006) Guideline on: groundwater monitoring for general reference purposes. IGRAC, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB (2010a) Application of analytical solution for stream depletion due to groundwater pumping in Gapcheon watershed, South Korea. Hydrol Process 24(24):3535–3546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB (2010b) Integrated consideration of quality and quantity to determine regional groundwater monitoring site in South Korea. Water Resour Manag 24:4009–4032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB, Yum BW (2007) Classification and characterization for water level time series of shallow wells at the National Groundwater Monitoring Stations. J Soil Groundwater Environ 12(5):86–97 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JW, Lee JY, Yi MJ, Kim GB, Won JH, Lee KK (2007) Allocation local groundwater monitoring stations for South Korea using an analytic hierarchy process. Hydrogeo J 15:615–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB, Ahn JS, Marui A (2009) Analytic hierarchy models for regional groundwater monitoring well allocation in Southeast Asian countries and South Korea. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB, Son YC, Lee SH, Jeong AC, Cha EJ, Ko MJ (2012) Understanding of surface water–groundwater connectivity in an alluvial plain using statistical methods. J Eng Geol 22(2):207–221 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBolle EM, Ahmed AA, Fogg GE (2003) Review of the integrated groundwater and surface-water model (IGSM). Ground Water 41:238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster-Jones PFF (1975) The interpretation of the Lugeon water-test. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 8(2):151–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Yi MJ, Yoo YK, Ahn KH, Kim GB, Won JH (2007) A review of the national groundwater monitoring network in Korea. Hydrol Process 21(7):907–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugeon M (1933) Barrage et Géologie. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PD, Ranjitham R, Valocchi AJ, Eheart JW (1989) Groundwater monitoring network design using coupled Monte Carlo simulation and optimization. Proc. 1989 National Conference on Hydraulics Engineering, ASCE, New York, pp 404–409

  • MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) (2007a) Master plan for groundwater management in Korea (2007–2011). Seoul, Korea

  • MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) (2007b) Report on the investigation of the groundwater use. Seoul, Korea

  • MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transportation, and Maritime Affairs) (2009) Master plan for the four major rivers restoration project. Seoul, Korea

  • Paulsen RJ, Smith CF, O’Rourke D, Wong T-F (2001) Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic ground water seepage meter. Ground Water 39:904–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevauviller P (2005) Groundwater monitoring in the context of EU legislation: reality and integration needs. J Environ Monit 7:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous MA, Paschetto JE, Olea RA (1982) Groundwater network design for Northwest Kansas using the theory of regionalized variables. Ground Water 20:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous MA, Townsend MA, Bogler LD, McClain TJ, Marks ET, Coble GR (1988) Experimental studies in stream–aquifer interaction along the Arkansas River in central Kansas: field testing and analysis. J Hydrol 98:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storck P, Eheart JW, Valocchi AJ (1997) A method for the optimal location of monitoring wells for detection of groundwater contamination in three-dimensional heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour Res 33(9):2081–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CJ, Alley WM (2002) Ground water level monitoring and the importance of long-term water level data. US Geological Survey Circular 1217, US Department of the Interior, Reston, Virginia

  • Terzaghi K, Peck R, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 72–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter TC, LaBaugh JW, Rosenberry DO (1988) The design and use of a hydraulic potentiomanometer for direct measurement of differences in hydraulic head between groundwater and surface water. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1209–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter TC, Harvey JW, Franke OL, Alley WM (1998) Ground water and surface water; A single resource. US Geological Survey Circular 1139, US Department of the Interior, Denver, Colorado

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the research project of “Advanced Technology for Groundwater Development and Application in Riversides (Geowater+)” in “Water Resources Management Program (code 11 Technology Innovation C05)” of the MOLIT and the KAIA in Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyoo-Bum Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, GB. Optimal distribution of groundwater monitoring wells near the river barrages of the 4MRRP using a numerical model and topographic analysis. Environ Earth Sci 73, 5497–5511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3802-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3802-8

Keywords

Navigation