Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil erosion modeling of a Himalayan watershed using RS and GIS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing the remote sensing (RS) and geographical information system (GIS), an assessment of sediment yield from Dikrong river basin of Arunachal Pradesh (India) has been presented in this paper. For prediction of soil erosion, the Morgan-Morgan and Finney (MMF) model and the universal soil loss equation (USLE) have been utilized at a spatial grid scale of 100 m × 100 m, an operational unit. The average annual soil loss from the Dikrong river basin is estimated as 75.66 and 57.06 t ha−1 year−1 using MMF and USLE models, respectively. The watershed area falling under the identified very high, severe, and very severe zones of soil erosion need immediate attention for soil conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baba SMJ, Yusof KW (2001) Modeling soil erosion in tropical environments using remote sensing and geographical informations systems. Hydrol Sci J 46(1):191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow CJ (1991) Land degradation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP, Murry RL, Lollen P (2001) Erodibility status under different land uses in Dikrong river basin of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian J Soil Conserv 29(3):280–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of north eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhruvanarayana VV, Rambabu (1983) Estimation of soil loss in India. J Irrig Drain Eng 109(4):419–433

  • Dickinson A, Collins R (1998) Predicting erosion and sediment yield at the catchment scale. Soil erosion at multiple scales. CAB Int 317–342

  • Erdogan EH, Erpul G, Bayramin I (2007) Use of USLE/GIS methodology for predicting soil loss in a semiarid agricultural environment. Environ Monit Assess 131:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu NB (2002) Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion. Water Resour Manag 16:447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Mc Cool DK, Renard KG, Moldenhauer WC (1991) Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI Metric Units. J Soil Water Conserv 36:355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu G, Chen S, McCool KD (2006) Modeling the impacts of no-till practice on soil erosion and sediment yield using RUSLE, SEDD and ArcView GIS. Soil Till Res 85:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1989) The Himalayan dilemma: reconciling development and conservation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC (2000) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):771–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil loss for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasrotia AS, Dhiman SD, Aggarwal SP (2002) Rainfall-runoff and soil erosion modeling using remote sensing and GIS technique—a case study of tons watershed. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 30(3):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose CS, Das DC (1982) Geomorphic prediction models for sediment production rate and intensive priorities of watershed in Mayurakshi catchment. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on hydrological aspects of mountainous watershed held at school of hydrology. University of Roorke, pp 15–23

  • Julien PY, Frenette M (1987) Macroscale analysis of upland erosion. Hydrol Sci J 32(3):347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY, Gonzales del Tanago M (1991) Spatially varied soil erosion under different climates. Hydrol Sci J 36(6):511–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby MJ (1976) Hydrogical slope models: the influence of climate. In: Derbyshire E (ed) Geomorphology and climate. Wiley, London, pp 247–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouli M, Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2008) Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environ Geol. doi:10.1007/s00254-008-1318-9

  • Lewis LA, Verstraeten G, Zhu H (2005) RUSLE applied in a GIS framework: calculating the LS factor and deriving homogeneous patches for estimating soil loss. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 7:809–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KJ, Sagong M, Engel BA, Tang Z, Choi J, Kim KS (2005) GIS based sediment assessment tool. Catena 64:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool DK, Foster GR, Mutchelor CK, Mayer LD (1987) Revised slope length factor for the universal soil loss equation. Trans ASAE 32:1387–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer LD, Wischmeier WH (1969) Mathematical simulation of the process of soil erosion by water. Trans Am Soc Agr Eng 12:754–758, 762

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra N, Satyanarayana T, Mukherjee RK (1984) Effect of topo elements on the sediment production rate from subwatersheds in upper Damodar valley. J Agr Eng (ISAE) 21(3):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (1986) Soil erosion and conservation. Longman, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2000) A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan–Finney model. Catena 44:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Morgan DDV, Finney HJ (1984) A predictive model for the assessment for the soil erosion risk. J Agr Eng Res 30:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onori F, De BonisP, Grauso S (2006) Soil erosion prediction at the basin scale using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a catchment of Sicily (southern Italy). Environ Geol 50:1129–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyando JO, Kisoyan P, Chemelil MC (2005) Estimation of potential soil erosion for river perkerra catchment in Kenya. Water Resour Manage 19:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 21:729–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Dabral PP, Chowdary VM, Yadav NK (2008a) Landslide hazard zonation using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Dikrong river basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Env Geol 54:1517–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC, Billib M (2008b) Runoff and sediment yield modeling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model. J Hydrol (Elsevier) 348(3–4):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao YP (1981) Evaluation of cropping management factor in universal soil loss equation under natural rainfall condition of Kharagpur, India. In: Proceedings of Southeast Asian regional symposium on problems of soil erosion and sedimentation. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, pp 241–254

  • Renschler C, Diekkruger B, Mannaerts C (1997) Regionalization in surface runoff and soil erosion risk evaluation. In: Regionalization of hydrology, vol 254. IAHS Publishers, UK, pp 233–241

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23(2):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satpathy KK, Dutta KK (1999) Re-vegetation of eroded hill slopes-an experience with geo-jute in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian J Soil Conserv 27(3):227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfeir-Younis A (1986) Soil conservation in developing countries. Western Africa Projects Department/The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S (1999) A resources atlas of Arunachal Pradesh. Government of Arunachal pradesh, Itanagar, pp 141–143

  • Singh G, Babu R, Narain P, Bhusan LS, Abrol IP (1992) Soil erosion rates in India. J Soil Water Conserv 47(1):97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Thampapillai DA, Anderson JR (1994) A review of the socio-economic analysis of soil degradation problem for developed and developing countries. Rev Marketing Agr Econ 62:291–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1972) Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydrol Div, ASCE 98(12):2087–2098

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1977) Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Trans ASAE 20:1100–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JP, Gallant JC (1996) EROS: a grid-based program for estimating spatially distributed erosion indices. Comp Geosci 22(7):707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA agricultural research services handbook 537. USDA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Li J, Huang G (2005) An evaluation of grid size uncertainty in empirical soil loss modelling with digital elevation models. Environ Model Assess 10:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino K, Ishioka Y (2005) Guidelines for soil conservation towards integrated basin management for sustainable development: a new approach based on the assessment of soil loss risk using remote sensing and GIS. Paddy Water Environ 3:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical help provided by scientists, Regional Remote Sensing Service Center, Kharagpur in carrying out this study. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous referees for useful suggestions, which led to a substantially improved manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, A., Mathur, A., Mishra, S.K. et al. Soil erosion modeling of a Himalayan watershed using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 59, 399–410 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0038-0

Keywords

Navigation