Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathologies Associated with Second Mandibular Molar Due to Various Types of Impacted Third Molar: A Comparative Clinical Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Impacted third molars are associated with various degrees of damage to the second molars. The possible complications also include distal cervical caries, root resorption of second molar, periodontal problems, odontogenic cysts, etc. Whether a particular impacted third molar is going to affect second molar depends upon its position and orientation in the bone.

Materials and Method

This study was carried out in 418 cases. Three examiners evaluated the patient clinically and radiographically and only those cases were included in this study where at least two observers agreed. A total of 341 cases (163 males and 178 female), age range (15–40 years) with impacted mandibular third molars, were included. Clinically and radiographically, the impacted mandibular third and second molars were evaluated; simultaneously, the prevalence of various pathologies associated with mandibular second molar (dental caries, periodontal pockets, root resorption) due to impacted third molar was also evaluated and compared among various types and positions of impactions.

Results

Statistical analysis was carried out using Pearson Chi-square and Asymp. Sig. (two-sided) test. Prevalence of mesioangular impactions was maximum (50.1%). Mesioangular impaction and position B (Pell and Gregory classification) were significantly associated with dental caries (32.20% and 33.90%, respectively), and periodontal pockets were seen higher with position B impactions (26.8%) {horizontal (14.7%), disto-angular (12.10%), vertical (14.5%) mesioangular (16.4%%)} in adjacent mandibular second molar. Root resorption was seen maximally in horizontal impaction (17.30%) with position c type (12.30%). The order of pathologies associated with second molar due to impacted third molar was dental caries (19.9%) > periodontal pockets (15.2%) > root resorption (8.5%).

Discussion

Evidence regarding pathologies are associated with second molar due to impacted third molar aids in decision making for surgical removal of third molars. Different types of impaction and the prevalence of pathologies related to them would aid in treatment planning of the impacted tooth as certain types have high probability of pathologies associated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Santosh P (2015) Impacted mandibular third molars: review of literature and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Ann Med Health Sci Res 5(4):229–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Juodzbalys G, Daugela P (2013) Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 4(2):e1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaves AJ, Nascimento LR, Costa ME, Franz-Montan M, Oliveira-Júnior PA, Groppo FC (2008) Effects of surgical removal of mandibular third molar on the periodontium of the second molar. Int J Dent Hygiene 6(2):123–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nazir A, Akhtar MU, Ali S (2014) Assessment of different patterns of impacted mandibular third molars and their associated pathologies. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2(2):14–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yorubulut S (2016) Assessment of third molar impaction pattern and associated clinical symptom in a central Antolian Turkish population. Med Princ Pract 25(2):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Radike AW. Criteria for diagnosis of dental caries. In: Proceedings of the conference on the clinical testing of cariostatic agents. Chicago: American Dental Association; October 14e16, 1968. p. 87e8. Chicago: ADA Council on Dental Research; 1972.

  7. Blakey GH, Jacks MT, Offenbacher S, Nance PE, Phillips C, Haug RH, White RP Jr (2006) Progression of periodontal disease in the second/third molar region in subjects with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(2):189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemcovsky CE, Lihfeld H, Zubery Y (1996) Effect of non-erupted 3rd molars on distal roots and supporting structures of approxima! Teeth. A radiographic survey of 202 cases. J Clin Periodontol 23:810–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai HH (2005) Factors associated with mandibular third molar eruption and impaction. J Clin Pediatr Dent 30:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levesque GY, Dermirjian A, Tanguay R (1981) Sexual dimorphism in the development emergence and agenesis of the mandibular third molar. J Dent Res 60:1735–1741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Introna F, Santoro V, De Donno A, Belviso M (2008) Morphologic analysis of third-molar maturity by digital orthopantomographic assessment. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 29:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tulloch JFC, Bouckoms AAA, Ung N (1990) Evaluation of the costs and relative effectiveness of alternative strategies for the removal of mandibular third molars. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 6:505–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Statements by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons concerning the management of selected clinical conditions and associated clinical procedures: the management of impacted third molar teeth. Rosemont: American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons; 2007.

  14. Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK (2003) Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies—a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 9(3):158–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen RT, Witherow H, Collyer J, Roper-Hall R, Nazir MA, Mathew G (2009) The mesioangular third molar—to extract or not to extract? Analysis of 776 consecutive third molars. Br Dent J 26:586–587

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang SW, Shin SY, Kum KY, Hong J (2009) Correlation study between distal caries in the mandibular second molar and the eruption status of the mandibular third molar in the Korean population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108(6):838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozeç I, HergünerSiso S, Taşdemir U, Ezirganli S, Göktolga G (2009) Prevalence and factors affecting the formation of second molar distal caries in a Turkish population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(12):1279–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Falci SG, de Castro CR, Santos RC, de Souza Lima LD, Ramos-Jorge ML, Botelho AM, Dos Santos CR (2012) Association between the presence of a partially erupted mandibular third molar and the existence of caries in the distal of the second molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(10):1270–1274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheikh MA, Riaz M, Shafiq S (2012) Incidence of distal caries in mandibular second molars due to impacted third molars a clinical and radiographic study. PODJ 32:364–370

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srivastava N, Shetty A, Goswami RD, Apparaju V, Bagga V, Kale S (2017) Incidence of distal caries in mandibular second molars due to impacted third molars: nonintervention strategy of asymptomatic third molars causes harm? A retrospective study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 7(1):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Syed KB, Alshahrani FS, Alabsi WS et al (2017) Prevalence of distal caries in mandibular second molar due to impacted third molar. J Clin Diagn Res 11(3):ZC28–ZC30

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blakey GH, Marciani RD, Haug RH et al (2002) Periodontal pathology associated with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1227–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mansfield JM, Campbell JH, Bhandari AR et al (2012) Molecular analysis of 16S rRNA genes identifies potentially pathogenic bacteria and archaea in the plaque of partially erupted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1507–1514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. White RP Jr, Madianos PN, Offenbacher S et al (2002) Microbial complexes detected in the second/third molar region in patients with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1234–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA et al (1998) Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 25:134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Tanner A et al (1998) Subgingivalmicrobiota in healthy, well-maintained elder and periodontitis subjects. J Clin Periodontol 25:346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. White RP Jr, Fisher EL, Phillips C, Tucker M, Moss KL, Offenbacher S (2011) Visible third molars as risk indicator for increased periodontal probing depth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(1):92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajasuo A, Meurman JH, Murtomaa H (1993) Periodontopathic bacteria and salivary microbes before and after extraction of partly erupted third molars. Scand J Dent Res 101:87–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gröndahl HG, Lekholm U (1973) Influence of mandibular third molars on related supporting tissues. Int J Oral Surg 2(4):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW (2001) Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol 72(12):1647–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Quee TA, Gosselin D, Millar EP, Stamm JW (1985) Surgical removal of the fully impacted mandibular third molar. The influence of flap design and alveolar bone height on the periodontal status of the second molar. J Periodontol 56(10):625–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Ikeda M, Hasegawa T (1999) Root resorption of mandibular second molar teeth associated with the presence of the third molars. Aust Dent J 44:112–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Consolaro A (2011) O conceito de reabsorçõesdentáriasou As reabsorçõesdentáriasnãosãomultifatoriais, nemcomplexas, controvertidasoupolêmicas! Dent Press J Orthod 16:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oenning AC, Melo SL, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F (2015) Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars—a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lacerda-Santos JT et al (2018) External root resorption of second molars caused by impacted third molars: an observational study in panoramic radiographs. Rev Odontol UNESP 47(1):25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. D’Costa ZV, Ahmed J, Ongole R, Shenoy N, Denny C, Binnal A (2017) Impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars: comparison of orthopantomogram and cone beam computed tomography. World J Dent 8(4):281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandeep Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasanna Kumar, D., Sharma, M., Vijaya Lakshmi, G. et al. Pathologies Associated with Second Mandibular Molar Due to Various Types of Impacted Third Molar: A Comparative Clinical Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 21, 1126–1139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01517-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01517-0

Keywords

Navigation