Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Efficiency of Using Oil Palm Frond Hydrolysate from Enzymatic Hydrolysis in Bioethanol Production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Present study aims to use oil palm frond (OPF) hydrolysate obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis as feedstock for ethanol production.

Methods

Pretreated OPF was used in this study. Optimization of ethanol production was performed using central composite design of response surface methodology. TAPPI Standard Methods were used to analyze the chemical composition of the pretreated OPF.

Results

The results obtained indicated that the biomass contains 63.68% of cellulose, 21.92% of hemicellulose and 14.4% of lignin content. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated OPF showed that the highest reducing sugar of 2444.6 µg/g was obtained when the biomass was hydrolysed using cellulase (40 U/g) and hemicellulase (10 U/g) for 150 min at 50 °C. The kinetic study indicated that the specific growth rate of S. cerevisiae HC10 during ethanol production was 0.034 h−1 with about 20.39 h of doubling time. The biomass yield coefficient and ethanol yield coefficient obtained were 0.1623 g cell/g sugar and 0.1191 g ethanol/g sugar, respectively. The highest ethanol yield was 79.4%. Fermentation profile for ethanol production demonstrated that the highest ethanol (7.23 g/L) was detected at 24 h of fermentation process. Under optimized conditions of inoculum, 30 mL; hydrolysate, 78.85 mL; pH, 4.50; and incubation time, 94.01 h, the highest ethanol yield was 13.79 g/L.

Conclusions

The results obtained from this study proved that OPF hydrolysate obtained from enzymes hydrolysis has high potential to be used as feedstock for ethanol production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fasahati, P., Woo, H.C., Liu, J.J.: Industrial-scale bioethanol production from brown algae: effects of pretreatment processes on plant economics. Appl. Energy 139, 175–187 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaturvedi, V., Verma, P.: An overview of key pretreatment process employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value-added products. Biotech 3, 415–431 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, R.A., Lavoie, J.M.: From first- to third-generation biofuels: challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Anim. Front. 3, 6–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, L., Owende, P.: Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 557–577 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aro E.-M.: From first-generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels. Ambio, 45 (Suppl. 1), 24–31 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lorestani, A.A.Z.: Biological treatment of palm oil effluent (POME) using an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film (UASFF) bioreactor. Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2006)

  7. Abdullah, N., Sulaiman, F.: The oil palm wastes in Malaysia. In: Matovic, M.D. (ed.) Biomass Now-sustainable Growth and Use. Science, Technology, and Medicine open access publisher (2013)

  8. Jamaludin, N.F.M.: Study on bioethanol production from oil palm trunk (OPT) sap by using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Kyokai No.7 (ATCC 26422). Bachelor of Chemical Engineering (Biotechnology), Universiti Malaysia Pahang (2010)

  9. Lim, S.H., Ibrahim, D., Che Omar, I.: Oil palm frond for the production of bioethanol. Int. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1, 007–011 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford, Don, L., Ronald, L.: Crawford.: Microbial degradation of lignocellulose: the Lignin Component. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31(5), 714–717 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Subramaniyam, R., Vimala, R.: Solid State and submerged fermentation for the production of bioactive substances: a comparative study. Int. J. Sci. Nat. 3, 480–486 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dombek, K.M., Ingram, L.O.: Ethanol production during batch fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae: changes in glycolytic enzymes and internal pH. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53(6), 1286–1291 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanbury, P.F.: Principles of Fermentation Technology, Pergamon Press, UK Ch.1 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mukhtar, Z.: Biological pretreatment of oil palm frond (OPF) for a better yield of fermentable sugar. Undergraduate Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2015)

  15. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith, F.: Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28, 350–356 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.L.: Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31, 426–428 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maurice, M.L.: Factors effecting ethanol fermentation via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2011)

  18. Abdul Halim, F.A.: Oil palm frond juice: potential feedstock for bioethanol production. Undergraduate Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2014)

  19. Behera, S.S., Ray, R.C.: Solid state fermentation for production of microbial cellulases: recent advances and improvement strategies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 86, 656–669 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, Y., Cheng, J.Y.: Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 1–11 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, Z.X., Huang, H., Zhang, H.M., Zhang, L., Yan, L.S., Chen, J.W.: Ball milling pretreatment of corn stover for enhancing the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162, 1872–1880 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tye, Y.Y., Lee, K.T., Wan Abdullah, W.N., Leh C.P.: Potential of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. (kapok fiber) as a resource for second generation bioethanol: effect of various simple pretreatment methods on sugar production. Bioresour. Technol. 116, 536–539 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X.Y., Yu, H.B., Huang, H.Y., Liu, Y.X.: Evaluation of biological pretreatment with white rot fungi for the enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 60, 159–164 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Winkelhausen, E., Velickova, E., Amartey, S. A., Kuzmanova, S.: Ethanol production using immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in lyophilized cellulose gel. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162, 2214–2220 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, B.R, Lawrence, S.J., Leclaire, J.P, Powell, C.D., Smart, K.A.: Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 535–569 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, C.K., Abdul Halim, F.A.: Oil palm frond juice: a potential feedstock for bioethanol production. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 4(12), 520–526 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maya Emira, M.S.: Production of bioethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae HC10 using oil palm frond juice (OPFJ). Undergraduate Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2015)

  28. Boender, L.G., De Hulster, E.A., Van Maris, A.J., Daran-Lapujade, P.A., Pronk, J.T.: Quantitative physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at near-zero specific growth rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5607–5614 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kartawiria, I.S., Syamsub, K., Noorb, E., Sa’idb, E.: Sorghum talk Juice pre-treatment method for bioethanol fermentation process. Energy Proc. 65, 140–145 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paredes-López, O., Camargo-Rubio, E., Ornelas-Vale, A.: Influence of specific growth rate on biomass yield, productivity, and composition of Candida utilis in batch and continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 31(4), 487–491 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brock, T.D.: Microbial growth rates in nature. Bacteriol. Rev. 35(1), 39–58 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Estela-Escalante, W.R.M., Melzoch, K., Hatta-Sakoda, B.: Effect of aeration on the fermentative activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultured in apple juice. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química. 11, 211–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng, N.G., Hasan, M., Kumoro, A.C.: Production of ethanol by fed-batch fermentation. J Sci. Technol. 17, 399–408 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, M.H., Kaur, P., Dien, B., Below, F., Vincent, M.L., Singh, V.: Use of tropical maize for bioethanol production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 1509–1515 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing short-term grant (304/PTEKIND/6312113). Special thanks to staffs of School of Industrial Technology, especially the laboratory assistant namely Mr. Azmaizan Yaakob and Mrs. Najmah Hamid. They have been very helpful in giving equipment assistance and providing for all my laboratory needs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chee Keong Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farah Amani, A.H., Toh, S.M., Tan, J.S. et al. The Efficiency of Using Oil Palm Frond Hydrolysate from Enzymatic Hydrolysis in Bioethanol Production. Waste Biomass Valor 9, 539–548 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0005-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0005-z

Keywords

Navigation