Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Particle Size on Methane Production of Raw and Alkaline Pre-treated Ensiled Sorghum Forage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Italy, sorghum is a suitable substrate for anaerobic digestion in agricultural biogas plants. However, its complex structure justifies the use of a pre-treatment to improve its anaerobic biodegradability. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of particle size on structural changes and methane production from ensiled sorghum forage, with and without the addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Sorghum samples were ground into particles with mean diameters of 2, 1, 0.5 and 0.25 mm. Then, samples milled into 1 and 0.25 mm particle sizes were soaked in a NaOH solution at 10 gNaOH/100gTS dosage and maintained at 55 °C for 12 h. The study revealed that no significant differences in terms of chemical composition were observed between 2 and 0.25 mm particle sizes. Moreover, after the addition of NaOH a similar reduction of lignin (around 30 %), cellulose (around 30–40 %), and hemicelluloses (around 40–45 %), on the solid fraction separated after the pretreatment, was observed for both particle sizes (1 and 0.25 mm). Similar results were confirmed by the Infrared spectroscopy technique which revealed that the crystallinity of cellulose seemed to be not significantly affected by the particle size reduction with and without the addition of NaOH. Finally, milling did not improve the methane production (\( 2 7 5. 3 \pm 3. 5 {\text{ mL}}_{{{\text{CH}}_{4} }} /{\text{gVS}} \)) and the kinetic constants (0.11 ± 0.01 d−1) between 2 and 0.25 mm. On the contrary, by adding the NaOH solution, an increase in both methane yield (by \( 3 2 4. 5 \pm 0. 7 {\text{ mL}}_{{{\text{CH}}_{ 4} }} /{\text{gVS}} \)) and kinetic constants (by 0.16 ± 0.00 d−1) was observed, but these results were not significantly influenced by the particle size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monlau, F., Barakat, A., Trably, E., Dumas, C., Steyer, J.P., Carrère, H.: Lignocellulosic materials into Biohydrogen and Biomethane: impact of structural features and pretreatment. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. doi:10.1080/10643389.2011.604258

  2. Taherzadeh, M.J., Karimi, K.: Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 9, 1621–1651 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Silva, G.G.D., Guilbert, S., Rouau, X.: Successive centrifugal grinding and sieving of wheat straw. Powder Technol. 208(2), 266–270 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kouichi, I., Okishio, Y.K., Nagao, N., Niwa, C., Yamamoto, S., Toda, T.: Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 64, 601–608 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mshandete, A., Björnsson, L., Kivaisi, A.K., Rubindamayugi, M.S.T., Mattiasson, B.: Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste. Renew. Energy 31(14), 2385–2392 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hills, D.J., Nakano, K.: Effects of pqrticle size on anaerobic digestion of tomato solid wastes. Agric. Wastes 10(4), 285–295 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas, C., Ghizzi Damasceno da Silva, G., Rouau, X., Carrère, H. and Steyer, J.P.: Wheat straw milling effect on biogas production. In: Proceeding of 12th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion, Guadalajara, Jalisco-Mexico, 31 October–4 November 2010

  8. Ficara, E., Malpei, F.: Maize mono-digestion efficiency: results from laboratory tests. Water Sci. Technol. 64(10), 2029–2037 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Menardo, S., Airoldi, G., Balsari, P.: The effect of particle size and thermal pre-treatment on the methane yield of four agricultural by-products. Bioresour. Technol. 104, 708–714 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie, S., Frost, J.P., Lawlor, P.G., Wu, G., Zhan, X.: Effects of thermo-chemical pre-treatment of grass silage on methane production by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 102(19), 8748–8755 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu, J., Wan, C., Li, Y.: Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7523–7528 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monlau, F., Barakat, A., Steyer, J.P., Carrère, H.: Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatment on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks. Bioresour. Technol. 120, 241–247 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sambusiti, C., Ficara, E., Rollini, M., Manzoni, M., Malpei, F.: Sodium hydroxide pretreatment of ensiled sorghum forage and wheat straw to increase methane production. Wat. Sci. Tech. (2012). doi:10.2166/wst.2012.480

    Google Scholar 

  14. APHA: American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. (1998)

  15. Effland, M.J.: Modified procedure to determine acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Tappi 60(10), 143–144 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petersson, A., Thomsen, M.H., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Thomsen, A.B.: Potential bioethanol and biogas production using lignocellulosic biomass from winter rye, oilseed rape and faba bean. Biomass Bioenergy 31(11–12), 812–819 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. OECD 311. Anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in digested sludge by measurement of gas production, (2006). doi:10.1787/9789264016842-en

  18. UNI EN ISO 11734:2004—Water quality—Evaluation of the “ultimate” anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in digested sludge—method by measurement of the biogas production

  19. Angelidaki, I., Sanders, W.: Assessment on the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 3, 117–129 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J.L., Guwy, A.J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P., Van Lier, J.B.: Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Wat. Sci. Tech. 59, 927–934 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashimoto, A.G.: Pretreatment of wheat straw for fermentation to methane. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28, 1857–1866 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Corredor, D.Y., Salazar J.M., Hohn, K.L., Bean, S., Bean, B., Wang, D.: Evaluation and characterization of forage sorghum as feedstock for fermentable sugar production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 158, 164–179 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spiridon, I., Teaca, C.A., Bodirlau, R.: Structural changes evidenced by ftir spectroscopy in cellulosic materials after pre-treatment with ionic liquid and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresources 6(1), 400–413 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shea, D., Xub, F., Genga, Z.C., Sunb, R.C., Jonesd, G.L., Bairde, M.S.: Physicochemical characterization of extracted lignin from sweet sorghum stem. Ind. Crop. Prod. 32, 21–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sills, D.L., Gossett, J.M.: Using FTIR spectroscopy to model alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of six lignocellulosic biomasses. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109(4), 894–903 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goshadroua, A., Karimia, K., Taherzadeh, M.J.: Bioethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse by Mucor hiemalis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 34, 1219–1225 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choudhary, R., Umagiliyage, A.L., Liang, Y., Siddaramu, T., Haddock, J., Markevicius, G.: Microwave pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification of sweet sorghum bagasse. Biomass Bioenergy 39, 218–226 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akerholm, M., Hinterstoisser, B., Salmen, L.: Characterization of the crystalline structure of cellulose using static and dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohyd. Res. 339(3), 569–578 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, C.L., Knierim, B., Manisseri, C., Arora, R., Scheller, H.V., Auer, M., Vogel, K.P., Simmons, B.A., Singh, S.: Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pre-treatment of switchgrass: biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour. Technol. 101(13), 4900–4906 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Driemeier, C., Calligaris, G.A.: Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 184–192 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carlos Driemeier, C., Pimenta, M.T.B., Rocha, G.J.M., Oliveira, M.M., Mello, D.B., Maziero, P., Goncalves, A.R.: Evolution of cellulose crystals during prehydrolysis and soda delignification of sugarcane lignocellulose. Cellulose 18, 1509–1519 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Monlau, F., Sambusiti, C., Barakat, A., Guo, X.M., Latrille, E., Trably, E., Steyer, J.P., Carrere, H.: Predictive models of biohydrogen and biomethane production based on the compositional and structural features of lignocellulosic materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 12217–12225 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marson, G.A., El Seoud, O.A.: Cellulose dissolution in lithium chloride/N, Ndimethylacetamide solvent system: relevance of kinetics of decrystallization to cellulose derivatization under homogeneous solution conditions. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 37, 3738–3744 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work has been conceived and supported in the context of Fabbrica della Bioenergia which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Sambusiti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sambusiti, C., Ficara, E., Malpei, F. et al. Effect of Particle Size on Methane Production of Raw and Alkaline Pre-treated Ensiled Sorghum Forage. Waste Biomass Valor 4, 549–556 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9199-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9199-x

Keywords

Navigation