Abstract
The inferior alveolar nerve and vessels are carried via the mandibular canal, which extends bilaterally from the inferior alveolar foramen to the mental foramen. Bifid and trifid mandibular canals result from abnormal fusions of nerve canals. The purpose of this study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive analysis of the prevalence of mandibular canal variations among healthy adults, and to identify any potential ethnic, sex, or laterality predilections. The prevalence of the bifid mandibular canal was 18.87% and that of the trifid canal 1.3%. Unilateral variants were three times commoner than bilateral. Each mandibular half had four canals emanating from separate openings on the lingual surface of the mandibular ramus. Retromolar and forward canals were the predominant subtypes, followed by dental; buccolingual were the least frequent. The mean length and diameter of the bifid mandibular canal were 13.62 mm and 1.63 mm, respectively. The possibility of a bifid mandibular canal is a crucial consideration in dental medicine. Because anatomical variations of the mandibular canal are fairly common, awareness of them is essential for anatomy teachers and for surgeons who operate in the oromaxillofacial region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afsa M, Rahmati H (2017) Branching of mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography. Singap Dent J 38:21–25
Auluck A, Pai K, Shetty C, Shenoi S (2005) Mandibular resorption in progressive systemic sclerosis: a report of three cases. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 34:384–386. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/14556986
Bürklein S, Grund C, Schäfer E (2015) Relationship between root apices and the mandibular canal: A cone-beam computed tomographic analysis in a German population. J Endod 41:1696–1700
Chanda S, Manoj R, Ramaswami E et al (2021) Anatomical variations of mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography- a retrospective Study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 33:183. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_229_20
Chavez-Lomeli, A PJ, Lory (1996) Kjaer I: The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. J Dent Res 75:1540–1544
de Castro MA, Barra SG, O LVM, Mhg A, (2018) Mesquita R A: Mandibular canal branching assessed with cone beam computed tomography. Radiol Med 123:601–608
de Freitas GB, Morais LA, Silva MBF et al (2015) Incidence and classification of bifid mandibular canals using cone beam computed tomography. Braz J Oral Sci 14:294–298
de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PHC, de Azambuja B-C et al (2012) Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 16:387–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0544-9
Dedeoglu N, Duman SB (2020) Prevalence of Bifid Mandibular Canals in Turkish Eastern Anatolia Population: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Diagn Res. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2020/42721.13508
Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK (1992) Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod 18:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81411-1
El Saket E, Eiid S, Abd El Samad A (2021) the prevalence and anatomical variations of bifid mandibular canal in a sample of egyptian population Using CBCT. A cross-sectional study. Egypt Dent J 67:447–456. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2020.50897.1358
Fu E, Peng M, Chiang C-Y et al (2014) Bifid mandibular canals and the factors associated with their presence: a medical computed tomography evaluation in a Taiwanese population. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:e64–e67. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12049
Fukami K, Shiozaki K, Mishima A et al (2012) Bifid mandibular canal: Confirmation of limited cone beam CT findings by gross anatomical and histological investigations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:460–465
Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL et al (2016) Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 45:20150310. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150310
Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Ramakrishnan PK et al (2017) Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: AQUA Tool Development. Clin Anat 30:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22799
Hur M, Kim H, Won S et al (2013) Topography and Spatial Fascicular Arrangement of the Human Inferior Alveolar Nerve. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00335.x
Iwanaga J, Katafuchi M, Matsushita Y et al (2020a) Anatomy of the mandibular canal and surrounding structures: Part I: Morphology of the superior wall of the mandibular canal. Ann Anat - Anat Anz 232:151580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151580
Iwanaga J, Shiromoto K, Kato T et al (2020b) Anatomy of the mandibular canal and surrounding structures. Part II: Cancellous pattern of the mandible. Ann Anat - Anat Anz 232:151583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020b.151583
Iwanaga J, Takeshita Y, Matsushita Y, Hur MS, Ibaragi S, Tubbs RS (2022) What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology. Surg Radiol Anat 44(1):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02862-y
Iwanaga J, Ibaragi S, Takeshita Y et al (2021a) Mandibular canal versus inferior alveolar canal: A Delphi study. Clin Anat 34:1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23740
Iwanaga J, Matsushita Y, Decater T et al (2021b) Mandibular canal vs. inferior alveolar canal: Evidence-based terminology analysis. Clin Anat N Y N 34:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23648
Kalia V, Pannu KS (2015) Role of CBCT in Locating Bifid Mandibular Canal: A Pilot Study. JIDA J Indian Dent Assoc 9
Kang J-H, Lee K-S, Oh M-G et al (2014) The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 44:53–60. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53
Kovisto T, Ahmad M (2011) Bowles W R: Proximity of the mandibular canal to the tooth apex. J Endod 37:311–315
Krasny A, Krasny N, Prescher A (2012a) Anatomic variations of neural canal structures of the mandible observed by 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:150–153
Krasny A, Krasny N, Prescher A (2012b) Study of inferior dental canal and its contents using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 34:687–693
Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A et al (2010) Bifid mandibular canals: Cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:235–239
Laçin N, Aytuğar E, Veli İ (2018) Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. Int Dent Res 8:78–83. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5
Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ (1985) Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Amer Dental Assoc (1939) 110(6):923–926
Lew K, Townsend G (2006) Failure to obtain adequate anaesthesia associated with a bifid mandibular canal: A case report. Aust Dent J 51:86–90
Lima Villaca-Carvalho M, R MLJ, E de MM (2016) Lopes S L: Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:289–294
Lindgren P, F EK, (2002) Ringberg A: Severe facial ischemia after endodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:576–579
Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z (2009) Inferior alveolar canal course: A radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:1212–1218
Luangchana P, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Kitisubkanchana J, Wongchuensoontorn C (2019) Branching patterns of the inferior alveolar canal in a Thai population: A novel classification using cone beam computed tomography. Quintessence Int 50:224–231
Moro A, Abe S, Yokomizo N et al (2018) Topographical distribution of neurovascular canals and foramens in the mandible: avoiding complications resulting from their injury during oral surgical procedures. Heliyon 4:e00812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00812
Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A et al (2014) Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 43:20140090. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140090
Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E (2009) Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:155–159
Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y et al (2010) Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:25–31
Neves FS, Nascimento MCC, Oliveira ML et al (2014) Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0428-z
Nithya J, Aswath N (2020) Assessing the prevalence and morphological characteristics of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography – a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Clin Imaging Sci 10:30. https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_67_2019
Nortjé CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW (1977) Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Brit J Oral Surg 15(1):55–63
Okumus Ö, Dumlu A (2019) Prevalence of bifid mandibular canal according to gender, type and side. J Dent Sci 14:126–133
Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, U SB, (2011) Paksoy C S: Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: A retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 33:501–507
Qaid N, Aldilami A, AL-Jawfi K, Shamala A, (2021) Prevalence and morphological assessment of bifid mandibular canal using cone beam computed tomography among a group of yemeni adults. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 33:242. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_218_20
Rashsuren O, W CJ, J HW, Kim E (eds) (2014) K: Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 44:229–236
Seri̇ndere G, Gündüz K, Bulut E (2017) Investigation of bifid mandibular canal frequency with cone beam computed tomography in a Turkish population. Anatomy 11:30–36
Shah NP, Murtadha L, Brown J (2018) Bifurcation of the inferior dental nerve canal: an anatomical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.01.016
Shan S, Zhong S, Li J, Wang T (2022) Systematic review and meta-analysis of mandibular canal variations on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00610-5
Sharma S, Hackett R, Webb R et al (2008) Severe tissue necrosis following intra-arterial injection of endodontic calcium hydroxide: A case series. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. Endod 105:666–669
Shen EF, M P, et al (2016) W: Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography. J Dent Sci 11:170–174
Sirera-Martín Á, Martínez-Almagro-Andreo A (2020) Variantes Anatómicas en el Canal Mandibular en Adultos Jóvenes Mayores de 30 Años. Int J Morphol 38:899–902. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022020000400899
Sperber GH, Sperber SM (2018) Craniofacial embryogenetics and development, Third edition. PMPH USA, Ltd, Raleigh, North Carolina
Verea Linares C, Mohindra A, Evans M (2016) Haemorrhage following coronectomy of an impacted third molar associated with a bifid mandibular canal: a case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg 9:248–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12206
von Arx T, Bornstein MM (2021) The bifid mandibular canal in three-dimensional radiography: morphologic and quantitative characteristics. Swiss Dent J 131:10–28
Yang X, Lyu C, Zou D (2017) Bifid mandibular canals incidence and anatomical variations in the population of Shanghai area by cone beam computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41:535–540
Yoon TYH, Robinson KD, Estrin E et al (2018) N: Utilization of cone beam computed tomography to determine the prevalence and anatomical characteristics of bifurcated inferior alveolar nerves. Gen Dent 66:22–26
Zhang Y-Q, Zhao Y-N, Liu D-G et al (2018) Bifid variations of the mandibular canal: cone beam computed tomography evaluation of 1000 Northern Chinese patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 126:e271–e278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.06.008
Zhou X, Gao X, Zhang J (2020) Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation. Surg Radiol Anat 42:1073–1079
Funding
The authors declare that they have not received any funding support from anywhere.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AA: conceptualization, search strategies, risk of bias, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation. AP: literature search, shortlisting of manuscripts, risk of bias, and data extraction. KSR: collection of literature, shortlisting of manuscripts, and manuscript editing. Joe Iwanaga: manuscript preparation, and manuscript review and editing. RST: manuscript preparation, and manuscript review and editing. SN: literature search and data extraction, PP: manuscript review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Asghar, A., Priya, A., Ravi, K.S. et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int 98, 176–184 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00682-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00682-7