Abstract
Critical thinking is an essential competency in the new information age. But research shows that students commonly lack critical thinking skills and hence promoting students’ critical thinking becomes crucial. This exploratory study investigated the extent to which secondary school students’ critical thinking could be promoted by writing reflections in the weblog. Students’ critical thinking was measured by using the Newman’s model. Results showed that writing reflections in the weblog could help promote students’ critical thinking and according to the Newman’s model, three categories of critical thinking were promoted the most, they were bringing outside knowledge or experience (O+), relevance (R+), and justification (J+). In addition, the study also found that the types of interaction with peers and the teacher had a more positive effect on the extent of critical thinking. Implications for other research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, P. (2007). What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.
Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 3(11), 3–15.
Chiu, Y. C. (2009). Facilitating Asian students’ critical thinking in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 42–57.
Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 265–279.
Churchill, D. (2009). A teacher’s reflections on educational applications of blogs with a postgraduate class. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 19((2/3), 112–125.
Davi, A., Frydenberg, M., & Gulati, G. (2007). Blogging across the disciplines: Integrating technology to enhance liberal learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3). Retrieved Junuary 10, 2009, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/frydenberg.htm.
Ehrman, S. C. (1994). Foreward. In R. A. Markwood & S. M. Johnstone (Eds.), New pathways to a degree: Technology opens the college (pp. 1–7). Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: Freeman.
Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (1994). Holistic critical thinking score rubric. Millbrae. CA: The California Academic Press. Retrieved January 7, 2009, from http://www.insightassessment.com/hctsr.html.
Ferdig, R., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the blogosphere. T.H.E Journal. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/16626.
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35.
Kajder, S. B., & Bull, G. (2003). Scaffolding for struggling students: Reading and writing with blogs. Learning and Leading with Technology, 31(2), 32–35.
Kanuka, H. (2000). Learner-content interaction: The silent but active participant. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.ulaval.ca/aced2000cade/francais/Actes/Kanuka-Heather.html.
Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kim, I., Anderson, R., Kim, N., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children’s collaborative online discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333–370.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
Lai, H. A. (2004). Building a collaborative online learning community: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(2), 119–136.
Landis, M., Swain, K. D., Friehe, M. J., & Coufal, K. L. (2007). Evaluating critical thinking in class and online: Comparison of the Newman method and the Facione rubric. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 28(3), 135–143.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41–45.
Lohr, L. L. (2000). Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 161–182.
Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case-study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 287–337.
MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, (4), 38–41.
Malek, A. (1999). The use of IT in enhancing learning—Project FRIENDSHIP. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.moe.gov.sg:80/edumall/mpite/edtech/papers/h1_1.pdf.
Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23–40.
Mason, M. (2007). Teaching thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339–349.
McMahon, G. (2009). Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian secondary school. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 269–281.
McPeck, J. (1981). Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85–103.
Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Retrieved October 29, 2004, from http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html.
Northeastern Illinois University (2006). Measuring critical thinking. Toolkit-The Nuts and Bolts Newsletter from Assessment and Services, 4(4). Retrieved January 29, 2010, from http://www.niu.edu/assessment/Toolkit/vol4_ish4.pdf.
Ohl, T. (2001). An interaction-centric learning model. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 311–332.
Oravec, J. A. (2002). Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.
Perkins, C., & Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 298–307.
Petress, K. (2004). Critical thinking: An extended definition. Education, 124(3), 461–466.
Pithers, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: a review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249.
Rowen, D. (2005). The write motivation: Using the Internet to engage students in writing across the curriculum. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(5), 22–23.
Scriven, M., & Paul. R. (2003). Defining critical thinking. Retrieved October 10, 2007, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/University/univclass/Defining.html.
Wang, Q. Y., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Designing hypermedia learning environments. In S. C. Tan & F. L. Wong (Eds.), Teaching and learning with technology: An Asia-pacific perspective (pp. 216–231). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Wang, Q. Y., & Woo, H. L. (2008). The affordances of weblogs and discussion forums for learning: A comparative analysis. Educational Technology, 48(5), 34–38.
Wang, Q. Y., Woo, H. L., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive learning environments, 17(1), 95–104.
Warschauer, M. (2001). Singapore’s dilemma: Control vs. autonomy in IT-led development. The Information Society, 17(4), 305–311.
Williams, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232–247.
Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17–34.
Woo, H. L., & Wang, Q. Y. (2009). Using weblog to promote critical thinking—An exploratory study. In C. Ardil (Ed.), Proceedings of World academy of science, engineering and technology (pp. 431–439). Paris: World Academy on Science, Engineering and Technology.
Acknowledgment
This study is funded by a Learning Sciences Lab research grant, number R8019.735.CT02. We wish to thank Alison Lin, the staff and students of the Secondary School who took part in the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Woo, H.L. Investigating students’ critical thinking in weblogs: an exploratory study in a Singapore secondary school. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 11, 541–551 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9101-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9101-5