Skip to main content
Log in

3D modelling of archaeological small finds by the structure sensor range camera: comparison of different scanning applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, range cameras represent a cheap, intuitive and effective technology for collecting the 3D geometry of objects and environments automatically and practically in real time. Such features can make these sensors a valuable tool for documenting archaeological small finds, especially when not expert users are involved. Therefore, in this work, Scanner and itSeez3D, two of the most promising scanning applications actually available for the Structure Sensor, a range camera specifically designed for mobile devices, were tested in order to evaluate their accuracy in modelling the 3D geometry of two archaeological artefacts, characterized by different shape and dimensions. The 3D models obtained through the two scanning applications were thus compared with the reference ones generated with the more accurate photogrammetric technique. The results demonstrate that both the applications show the same level of geometric accuracy, which amounts generally to very few millimetres, from an overall point of view, and, at the same time, they substantially point out the good quality of the Structure Sensor 3D reconstruction technology. In particular, the itSeez3D application is surely the best solution for the color restitution, even if it requires a payment of $7 to export and thus to use effectively each model generated. On the other side, Scanner is a free application and its geometric accuracy is comparable to that of itSeez3D, but, however, the colours are frequently smoothed and sometimes not fully rendered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ciasca (1979):216, fig. 18.3, pl. LXXVI,4

  2. Ciasca and Toti (1994):12, pl. III; Orsingher (2014): 150.

References

  • Agisoft PhotoScan (2017). http://www.agisoft.com/

  • Agisoft PhotoScan (2018) Agisoft PhotoScan User Manual. http://www.agisoft.com/pdf/photoscan-pro_1_4_en.pdf

  • Best PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradski G, Kaehler A (2008) Learning openCV: computer vision with the openCV library. O’Reilly Media, Inc, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciasca A (1979) Scavi alle mura di mozia (campagna 1978). Rivista di Studi Fenici Roma 7(2):207–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciasca A, Toti MP (1994) Maschera. Scavi a Mozia: le terrecotte figurate, 33

  • Girardeau-Montaut D (2017a) Cloud-to-mesh distance—CloudCompareWiki. http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Cloud-to-Mesh_Distance

  • Girardeau-Montaut D (2017b) CloudCompare—3D point cloud and mesh processing software—Version 2.8.1. Open Source Project

  • Itseez3D (2017). https://itseez3d.com/

  • Orsingher A (2014) Listen and protect: reconsidering the grinning masks after a recent find from motya. Vicino Oriente 43:145–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravanelli R, Di Rita M, Nascetti A, Crespi M, Nigro L, Montanari D, Spagnoli F (2017a) Penguin 3.0—Capturing small finds in 3D. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 17(2):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravanelli R, Lastilla L, Crespi M (2017b) 3D modelling by low-cost range camera: software evaluation and comparison. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W8:209–212

  • Ravanelli R, Nascetti A, Di Rita M, Nigro L, Montanari D, Spagnoli F, Crespi M (2017c) 3D modelling of archaeological small finds by a low-cost range camera: methodology and first results. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-5/W1:589–592

  • Scanner (2017). https://itunes.apple.com/it/app/scanner-structure-sensor-sample/id891169722?mt=8

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply indebted to the Superintendence of Trapani (R. Giglio) and the G. Whitaker Foundation (Palermo; M.P. Toti), for making available the two archaeological items.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sapienza University of Rome Archaeological Expedition to Motya under the funding “Grandi Scavi” of the University of Rome La Sapienza.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Ravanelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravanelli, R., Lastilla, L., Nascetti, A. et al. 3D modelling of archaeological small finds by the structure sensor range camera: comparison of different scanning applications. Appl Geomat 10, 399–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0215-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0215-5

Keywords

Navigation