Skip to main content
Log in

Benthic foraminifera in sandy (siliciclastic) coastal sediments of the Arabian Gulf (Saudi Arabia): a technical report

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current report presents the benthic foraminiferal assemblages in a unique siliciclastic sediment substrate in Half Moon Bay on the Saudi coastline. At this locality, only two genera namely Elphidium de Montfort 1808 and Ammonia Brünnich 1772 were observed in a depth transect. The genus Elphidium dominated the foraminiferal assemblages, supporting the idea of its resistant nature in a siliciclastic environment where the mechanical action of waves and minor accumulations of organic matter prevent abundant and/or diversified foraminiferal assemblages. Environmental analysis suggests that the site is completely unpolluted, and the foraminiferal assemblage is unaffected by anthropogenic factors and only reflects seasonal and substrate parameters. It can be therefore considered as a benchmark for future studies along the Saudi coastline. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report presenting information on foraminiferal assemblages from a siliciclastic environment in the western Arabian Gulf, as previous studies were reported from carbonate sand and muddy substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Plate 1

References

  • Arslan M, Kaminski MA, Tawabini BS, Ilyas M, Babalola LO, Frontalini F (2016) Seasonal variations, environmental parameters, and standing crop assessment of benthic foraminifera in Eastern Bahrain, Arabian gulf. Geol Q 60:24–35. doi:10.7306/gq.1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Buosi C, du Châtelet EA, Cherchi A (2012) Benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the current-dominated strait of Bonifacio (Mediterranean Sea). J Foraminiferal Res 42:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzas MA (1989) The effect of quartz versus calcareous sand on the densities of living foraminifera. Micropaleontology 35(2):135–141

  • Debenay JP, Tsakiridis E, Soulard R, Grossel H (2001) Factors determining the distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in port Joinville Harbor (Ile d’Yeu, France): the influence of pollution. Mar Micropaleontol 43:75–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diz P, Francés G, Costas S, Souto C, Alejo I (2004) Distribution of benthic foraminifera in coarse sediment, Ría de Vigo, NW Iberian margin. J Foraminifer Res 34:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward BW, Grenfell H, Cairns G, Smith A (1996) Environmental controls on benthic foraminiferal and thecamoebian associations in a New Zealand tidal inlet. J Foraminifer Res 26:150–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges JI, Keil RG (1995) Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis. Mar Chem 49:81–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipnitz II, Ferreira F, Jardim Leão C, du Châtelet E A, Frontalini F (2014) Foraminiferal and testate amoeba diversity, distribution and ecology in transitional environments of the Tramandaí Basin (Rio Grande do Sul, South Brazil). Mar Biod 44:415–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligero RA, Barrera M, Casas-Ruiz M, Sales D, Lopez-Aguayo F (2002) Dating of marine sediments and time evolution of heavy metal concentrations in the bay of Cádiz, Spain. Environ Pollut 118:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long ER, MacDonald DD, Smith SL, Calder FD (1995) Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ Manag 19:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meric E, Avsar N, Yokes MB, Dincer F (2014) Atlas of recent benthic foraminifera from Turkey. Micropaleontology 60:211–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppe LJ, Eliason AH, Fredericks JJ, Rendigs RR, Blackwood D, Polloni CF (2000) Grain size analysis of marine sediments: methodology and data processing. US Geological Survey East Coast sediment analysis: procedures, database, and georeferenced displays. US Geological Survey Open File Report 00–358. http://pubs. usgs. gov/of/2000/of00–358. Chicago

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, under grant IN121028. We thank Khalid Al-Ramadan and Lamidi Babalola for advice and logistical support and Dr. Justin Parker and Prof. Alan Lord for pre-reviewing a draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Arslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Physicochemical parameters of the water and grain size parameters and quartz content of the sediments in the sampling stations
Table 2 Nitrates, sulfates, total organic carbon (TOC), total hydrocarbon content (THC), and heavy metal contents in the depth transect
Table 3 Benthic foraminiferal assemblage parameters and relative abundances of the recognized taxa with minimum, maximum, and mean values in the depth transect

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslan, M., Kaminski, M.A., Tawabini, B.S. et al. Benthic foraminifera in sandy (siliciclastic) coastal sediments of the Arabian Gulf (Saudi Arabia): a technical report. Arab J Geosci 9, 285 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2436-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2436-4

Keywords

Navigation