Skip to main content
Log in

Quality assessment of pan-sharpening methods in high-resolution satellite images using radiometric and geometric index

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on quality assessment of fusion of multispectral (MS) images with high-resolution panchromatic (Pan) images. Since most existing quality assessments take the entire image into account simultaneously and generate some uncertainties, a novel and rather objective quality index has been proposed for image fusion. The index is comprised of geometric and radiometric parts. Both geometric and radiometric measurements are calculated using morphological algorithm applied on an edge image to create a mask which is used to separate high-frequency regions from low-frequency ones. The accuracy assessment is made using common existing criteria on geometric and radiometric segments, and then a weighted sum is calculated to generate radiometric and geometric index (RG index). Several commonly used fusion algorithms such as IHS, modified IHS, PCA, Gram-Schmidt, Brovey Transform, Ehlers, High-Pass Modulation, Schowengerdt and UNB were applied on a very high-resolution GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 images. In order to perform quality assessment, methods of Spectral Angle Mapper, Structural SIMilarity, correlation coefficients and universal quality index for which the normalization were possible (for comparison purposes) were used. The utilized RG index showed that by separating spectral and spatial component quality measurement, the quality assessment is made on fused images in a more distinct, explicit, accurate and objective manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alipour Fard T, Hasanlou M, Arefi H (2014) Classifier fusion of high-resolution optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Satellite imagery for classification in urban area. ISPRS Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-2/W3:25–29. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W3-25-2014

  • Alparone L, Baronti S, Garzelli A, Nencini F (2004a) A global quality measurement of pan-sharpened multispectral imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 1:313–317. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2004.836784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alparone L, Baronti S, Garzelli A, Nencini F (2004b) Landsat ETM+ and SAR image fusion based on generalized intensity modulation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42:2832–2839. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2004.838344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 8:679–698. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DadrasJavan F, Samadzadegan F (2014) An object-level strategy for pan-sharpening quality assessment of high-resolution satellite imagery. Adv Space Res 54:2286–2295. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du P, Liu S, Xia J, Zhao Y (2013) Information fusion techniques for change detection from multi-temporal remote sensing images. Inf Fusion 14:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2012.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers M (1991) Multisensor image fusion techniques in remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 46:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Joshi PK (2013) Assessment of pan-sharpened very high-resolution WorldView-2 images. Int J Remote Sens 34:8336–8359. doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.838706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2010) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Tata McGraw Hill Education. https://books.google.com/books?id=a_gBhCAyt2kC&dq=Digital+image+processing+using+MATLAB&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFuvTmtbzJAhWKfxoKHUUlD_oQ6AEIHTAA

  • Hazini S, Hashim M (2015) Comparative analysis of product-level fusion, support vector machine, and artificial neural network approaches for land cover mapping. Arab J Geosci 8:9763–9773. doi:10.1007/s12517-015-1915-3

  • Helmy AK, El-Tawel GS (2015) An integrated scheme to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of satellite images. Egypt Inform J 16:121–131. doi:10.1016/j.eij.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MM, Alparone L, Chanussot J (2009) Pansharpening quality assessment using the modulation transfer functions of instruments. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47:3880–3891. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2029094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laben CA, Brower BV (2000) Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening. US6011875 A. https://www.google.com/patents/US6011875

  • Nichol J, Wong MS (2005) Satellite remote sensing for detailed landslide inventories using change detection and image fusion. Int J Remote Sens 26:1913–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C, Hashim M (2013) Using advanced image fusion techniques to increase the usability of Razaksat data for map updating in the tropics. In: ACRS 2013. Bali, Indonesia

  • Pohl C, Van Genderen JL (1998) Review article multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. Int J Remote Sens 19:823–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidi V, Pradhan B, Idrees MO, Abd Latif Z (2014) Fusion of airborne LiDAR with multispectral SPOT 5 image for enhancement of feature extraction using dempster-shafer theory. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52:6017–6025. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2294398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schowengerdt RA (2006) Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. Elsevier

  • Toet A, Franken EM (2003) Perceptual evaluation of different image fusion schemes. Displays 24:25–37. doi:10.1016/S0141-9382(02)00069-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu T-M, Su S-C, Shyu H-C, Huang PS (2001) A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods. Inf Fusion 2:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu T-M, Huang PS, Hung C-L, Chang C-P (2004) A fast intensity-hue-saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for IKONOS imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 1:309–312. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2004.834804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald L, Ranchin T, Mangolini M (1997) Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: assessing the quality of resulting images. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63:691–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13:600–612. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Ziou D, Armenakis C et al (2005) A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43:1391–1402. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2005.846874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2002) A new automatic approach for effectively fusing Landsat 7 as well as IKONOS images. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002. IGARSS’02. 2002 I.E. International, vol. 4. pp 2429–2431

  • Zhang Y (2008) Methods for image fusion quality assessment—a review, comparison and analysis. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37:1101–1109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Hasanlou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasanlou, M., Saradjian, M.R. Quality assessment of pan-sharpening methods in high-resolution satellite images using radiometric and geometric index. Arab J Geosci 9, 45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2015-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2015-0

Keywords

Navigation