Skip to main content
Log in

Petrophysical evaluation study of Khasib Formation in Amara oil field, South Eastern Iraq

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study represents evaluation of petrophysical properties for Khasib Formation in four wells of Amara oil field (Am-1, Am-2, Am-5, and Am-6). The petrophysical evaluation was based on well logs and core plug data to delineate the petrophysical characteristics of Khasib Formation. The available well logs such as (sonic, density, neutron, gamma ray, SP, and resistivity logs) are digitized using the Didger software package. The environmental corrections and petrophysical parameters such as porosity, water saturation, hydrocarbon saturation, bulk water volume, etc. were computed and interpreted using Interactive Petrophysics program. Net-to-gross (NTG) values of Khasib reservoir were calculated using core plug data (porosity and permeability). Lithological and mineralogical studies using porosity combination cross plots show that Khasib Formation consists mainly of limestone with shale at the bottom of the formation and the essential mineral components are dominantly calcite. Interpretation of petrophysical characteristics indicate that the Khasib Formation consists of three units: upper Khasib, middle Khasib, and lower Khasib. Middle Khasib represents the principal oil-bearing unit in Khasib Formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Am-1:

Amara Well-1

Am-2:

Amara Well-2

Am-5:

Amara Well-5

Am-6:

Amara Well-6

a:

Tortuosity factor

BVW:

Bulk volume water

CPI:

Computer Processing Interpretation

F:

formation resistivity factor

GR:

Gamma ray log

m:

cementation exponent in Archie equation

n:

saturation exponent in Archie equation

PHIN:

Neutron log

PHIT:

Total porosity

PHIE:

Effective porosity

RHOB:

Density log

Rw:

Resistivity of water formation

Rt:

Resistivity of uninvaded zone

Rxo:

Resistivity of invaded zone

Sw:

water saturation in uninvaded zone

Sxo:

Water saturation in invaded zone

SPI:

Secondary porosity index

Δtma:

sonis transit time in rock matrix

Δtmaa:

Apparent sonis transit time in rock matrix

ΔT (DT):

Sonic transit time

References

  • Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. AIME 146:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asquith GB, Krygowski D (2004) Basic well log analysis, 2nd edition: AAPG methods in exploration series 16. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Oklahoma, 244p

    Google Scholar 

  • Desbrandes R 1985 Encyclopedia of well logging

  • Dresser Atlas (1979) Log interpretation charts. Dresser Industries, Inc, Houston, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorab M, Mohmed AMR, Nouh AZ (2008) The relation between the shale origin (source or non-source) and its type for Abu Roash Formation at Wadi El-Natrun area, south of Western Desert, Egypt. Australian J Basic Appl Sci 2(3):360–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilchie DW (1978) Applied open hole log interpretation. D. W. Hilchie, Inc., Colorado, 309 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassim SZ, Goff JC (2006) Geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno, 341p

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz AJ, Thompson AH (1986) Qualitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review B 34:879–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levrson LA (1972) Geology of petroleum 2nd ed. Freeman, W.H. and Company, Pub, San Francisco, p 724

    Google Scholar 

  • Missan Oil Company. Final well reports for (Am-1, Am-2,), Reservoir and Fields Development Department

  • Schlumberger 1974 Log interpretation, vol. II-applications: New York

  • Schlumberger (1997) Log interpretation charts. Schlumberger Wireline and Testing, Houston, p 193

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger (1998) Cased hole log interpretation principles/applications. Schlumberger Wireline and Testing, Houston, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger 2011 log interpretation chartbook. Schlumberger, 151p

  • Wyllie MRJ, Gregory AR, Gardner GHF (1958) An experimental investigation of the factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media. Geophysics 23:459–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Buraq Adnan Al-Baldawi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Baldawi, B.A. Petrophysical evaluation study of Khasib Formation in Amara oil field, South Eastern Iraq. Arab J Geosci 8, 2051–2059 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1371-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1371-5

Keywords

Navigation