Abstract
Purpose of Review
Ischemic heart disease is caused by atherosclerosis, the build-up of plaque in the coronary arteries, which can lead to the development of heart attacks and heart muscle damage. Despite the advent of medical and surgical therapy to prevent and treat atherosclerosis and its adverse clinical effects, ischemic heart disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have suggested that the immune system may play a greater role in the development of plaque rupture and adverse left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Understanding the molecular processes by which inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease is, therefore, worthwhile. This review focuses on new molecular imaging techniques to visualize immune cells to study their contribution to ischemic heart disease.
Recent Findings
A common technique applied to imaging inflammation in ischemic heart disease is targeting the up-regulation and trafficking of immune cells, which may contribute to the adverse consequences associated with atherosclerosis. In the past 5 years, advances in cell labeling for imaging with PET and MRI, including radioisotopes and nanoparticles, have confirmed that inflammatory cells can be visualized in vivo and in greater abundance in unstable cardiovascular disease and in areas of ischemic damage. The major criticisms of these studies to date include their small sample size, lack of histological correlation, limited association with long-term outcomes, and bias toward macrophage imaging.
Summary
While much progress has been made in imaging inflammation in ischemic heart disease over the past 5 years, additional studies in larger cohorts with histological validation and outcome correlation are needed. Nevertheless, imaging inflammation using PET or MRI has the potential to become an important adjunct tool to improve the diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic monitoring of patients with ischemic heart disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
16 May 2018
The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in the abbreviations and body of the text. The Authors had correctly pointed out these errors at the proof stage but were regretfully not implemented at the production level.
Abbreviations
- ACS:
-
acute coronary syndrome
- CHD:
-
coronary heart disease
- 11C-PK11195:
-
11C-N-methyl-N-[1-methylpropyl]-1-[2-chlorophenyl]-isoquinoline-3-carboxamide
- CT:
-
computed tomography
- DOTATATE:
-
[1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N, N′, N″, N″′-tetraacetic acid]-d-Phe1, Tyr3-octreotate
- FDG:
-
2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose
- 18F-GE-180:
-
S-N, N-diethyl-9-[2-18F-fluoroethyl]-5-methoxy 2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbamazole-4-carboxamide
- IHD:
-
ischemic heart disease
- LOX-1:
-
lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1
- LV:
-
left ventricular
- MRI:
-
magnetic resonance imaging
- NPR-C:
-
natriuretic peptide receptor C
- PEG:
-
polyethylene glycol
- PET:
-
positron emission tomography
- SPECT:
-
single-photon emission computed tomography
- SPIONs:
-
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
- SST:
-
somatostatin
- SUVmean:
-
mean standardized uptake value
- TSPOs:
-
translocator proteins
References
Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–603.
Hansson GK. Inflammation atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1685–95.
Hiari N, Rudd JH. FDG PET imaging and cardiovascular inflammation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011;13(1):43–8.
Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, Jones HA, Clark JC, Antoun N, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105(23):2708–11.
Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Rudd JH. PET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(8):443–57.
Westman PC, Lipinski MJ, Luger D, Waksman R, Bonow RO, Wu E, et al. Inflammation as a driver of adverse left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(17):2050–60.
Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2981–8.
Phelps ME. Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(16):9226–33.
Phelps ME. PET: the merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(4):661–81.
Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen J, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31.
Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M, Pittet MJ. Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2014;13(2):125–38.
Wei H, Bruns OT, Kaul MG, Hansen EC, Barch M, Wiśniowska A, et al. Exceedingly small iron oxide nanoparticles as positive MRI contrast agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(9):2325–30.
Calcagno C, Ramachandran S, Millon A, Robson PM, Mani V, Fayad Z. Gadolinium-based contrast agents for vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of atherosclerosis. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2013;6(1):11–24.
Marangoni VS, Neumann O, Henderson L, Kaffes CC, Zhang H, Zhang R, et al. Enhancing T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast with internalized gadolinium(III) in a multilayer nanoparticle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(27):6960–5.
Huang G, Li H, Chen J, et al. Tunable T1 and T2 contrast abilities of manganese-engineered iron oxide nanoparticles through size control. Nano. 2014;6(17):10404–12.
Leuschner F, Rauch PJ, Ueno T, Gorbatov R, Marinelli B, Lee WW, et al. Rapid monocyte kinetics in acute myocardial infarction are sustained by extramedullary monocytopoiesis. J Exp Med. 2012;209(1):123–37.
Montet-Abou K, Daire JL, Hyacinthe JN, Jorge-Costa M, Grosdemange K, Mach F, et al. In vivo labelling of resting monocytes in the reticuloendothelial system with fluorescent iron oxide nanoparticles prior to injury reveals that they are mobilized to infarcted myocardium. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(11):1410–20.
Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):787–95.
Xia W, Hilgenbrink AR, Matteson EL, Lockwood MB, Cheng JX, Low PS. A functional folate receptor is induced during macrophage activation and can be used to target drugs to activated macrophages. Blood. 2009;113(2):438–46.
Ayala-Lopez W, Xia W, Varghese B, Low PS. Imaging of atherosclerosis in apoliprotein e knockout mice: targeting of a folate-conjugated radiopharmaceutical to activated macrophages. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(5):768–74.
Jager NA, Westra J, van Dam GM, Teteloshvili N, Tio RA, Breek JC, et al. Targeted folate receptor beta fluorescence imaging as a measure of inflammation to estimate vulnerability within human atherosclerotic carotid plaque. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(8):1222–9.
Jager NA, Westra J, Golestani R, van Dam GM, Low PS, Tio RA, et al. Folate receptor-beta imaging using 99mTc-folate to explore distribution of polarized macrophage populations in human atherosclerotic plaque. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(12):1945–51.
Shah PK, Chyu KY, Dimayuga PC, Nilsson J. Vaccine for atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(25):2779–91.
Griessinger CM, Kehlbach R, Bukala D, Wiehr S, Bantleon R, Cay F, et al. In vivo tracking of Th1 cells by PET reveals quantitative and temporal distribution and specific homing in lymphatic tissue. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(2):301–7.
Koya RC, Mok S, Comin-Anduix B, Chodon T, Radu CG, Nishimura MI, et al. Kinetic phases of distribution and tumor targeting by T cell receptor engineered lymphocytes inducing robust antitumor responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14286–91.
Aarntzen EH, Srinivas M, De Wilt JH, et al. Early identification of antigen-specific immune responses in vivo by [18F]-labeled 3′-fluoro-3′-deoxy-thymidine ([18F]FLT) PET imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(45):18396–9.
Malviya G, D'Alessandria C, Bonanno E, Vexler V, Massari R, Trotta C, et al. Radiolabeled humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody visilizumab for imaging human T-lymphocytes. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(10):1683–91.
Mall S, Yusufi N, Wagner R, Klar R, Bianchi H, Steiger K, et al. Immuno-PET imaging of engineered human T cells in tumors. Cancer Res. 2016;76(14):4113–23.
Tavare R, McCracken MN, Zettlitz KA, et al. Engineered antibody fragments for immuno-PET imaging of endogenous CD8+ T cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(3):1108–13.
Tavare R, McCracken MN, Zettlitz KA, et al. Immuno-PET of murine T cell reconstitution postadoptive stem cell transplantation using anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 cys-diabodies. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(8):1258–64.
Griessinger CM, Maurer A, Kesenheimer C, Kehlbach R, Reischl G, Ehrlichmann W, et al. 64Cu antibody-targeting of the T-cell receptor and subsequent internalization enables in vivo tracking of lymphocytes by PET. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(4):1161–6.
Sadat U, Howarth SP, Usman A, Tang TY, Graves MJ, Gillard JH. Sequential imaging of asymptomatic carotid atheroma using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(8):e271–6.
Mojtahedi A, Alavi A, Thamake S, Amerinia R, Ranganathan D, Tworowska I, et al. Assessment of vulnerable atherosclerotic and fibrotic plaques in coronary arteries using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;5(1):65–71.
Pedersen SF, Sandholt BV, Keller SH, Hansen AE, Clemmensen AE, Sillesen H, et al. 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/MRI for detection of activated macrophages in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: studies in patients undergoing endarterectomy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(7):1696–703.
Malmberg C, Ripa RS, Johnbeck CB, Knigge U, Langer SW, Mortensen J, et al. 64Cu-DOTATATE for noninvasive assessment of atherosclerosis in large arteries and its correlation with risk factors: head-to-head comparison with 68Ga-DOTATOC in 60 patients. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(12):1895–900.
Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Evans NR, Chowdhury MM, Figg NL, Shah AV, et al. Detection of atherosclerotic inflammation by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET compared to [18F]FDG PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(14):1774–91.
Wan MYS, Endozo R, Michopoulou S, Shortman R, Rodriguez-Justo M, Menezes L, et al. PET/CT imaging of unstable carotid plaque with 68Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor ligand. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(5):774–80.
Alam SR, Shah AS, Richards J, et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in patients with acute myocardial infarction: early clinical experience. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(5):559–65.
Rischpler C, Dirschinger RJ, Nekolla SG, Kossmann H, Nicolosi S, Hanus F, et al. Prospective evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in postischemic myocardium by simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic marker of functional outcome. Circ. Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(4):e004316.
Stirrat CG, Alam SR, MacGillivray TJ, et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessing inflammation after myocardial infarction. Heart. 2017;103(19):1528–35.
Menezes LJ, Kotze CW, Hutton BF, Endozo R, Dickson JC, Cullum I, et al. Vascular inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: when to image? J Nucl Med. 2009;50(6):854–7.
Rogers IS, Nasir K, Figueroa AL, Cury RC, Hoffmann U, Vermylen DA, et al. Feasibility of FDG imaging of the coronary arteries: comparison between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(4):388–97.
Baber U, Mehran R, Sartori S, Schoos MM, Sillesen H, Muntendam P, et al. Prevalence, impact, and predictive value of detecting subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults: the BioImage study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1065–74.
Folco EJ, Sheikine Y, Rocha VZ, Christen T, Shvartz E, Sukhova GK, et al. Hypoxia but not inflammation augments glucose uptake in human macrophages: implications for imaging atherosclerosis with 18fluorine-labeled 2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(6):603–14.
Bird JL, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Davies JR, et al. Evaluation of translocator protein quantification as a tool for characterising macrophage burden in human carotid atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210(2):388–91.
Boutin H, Murray K, Pradillo J, Maroy R, Smigova A, Gerhard A, et al. 18F-GE-180: a novel TSPO radiotracer compared to 11C-R-PK11195 in a preclinical model of stroke. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(3):503–11.
Guo Q, Colasanti A, Owen DR, Onega M, Kamalakaran A, Bennacef I, et al. Quantification of the specific translocator protein signal of 18F-PBR111 in healthy humans: a genetic polymorphism effect on in vivo binding. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(11):1915–23.
Li D, Patel AR, Klibanov AL, Kramer CM, Ruiz M, Kang BY, et al. Molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques targeted to oxidized LDL receptor LOX-1 by SPECT/CT and magnetic resonance. Circulation. Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(4):464–72.
Tahara N, Mukherjee J, de Haas HJ, Petrov AD, Tawakol A, Haider N, et al. 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-mannose positron emission tomography imaging in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2014;20(2):215–9.
Howarth SP, Tang TY, Trivedi R, et al. Utility of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to identify inflammation and the fibrous cap: a comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(3):555–60.
Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, et al. The ATHEROMA (atorvastatin therapy: effects on reduction of macrophage activity) study. Evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(22):2039–50.
Woodard PK, Liu Y, Pressly ED, Luehmann HP, Detering L, Sultan DE, et al. Design and modular construction of a polymeric nanoparticle for targeted atherosclerosis positron emission tomography imaging: a story of 25% 64Cu-CANF-Comb. Pharm Res. 2016;33(10):2400–10.
Jung K, Kim P, Leuschner F, Gorbatov R, Kim JK, Ueno T, et al. Endoscopic time-lapse imaging of immune cells in infarcted mouse hearts. Circ Res. 2013;112(6):891–9.
Hilgendorf I, Swirski FK, Robbins CS. Monocyte fate in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(2):272–9.
Weirather J, Hofmann UD, Beyersdorf N, et al. Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells improve healing after myocardial infarction by modulating monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Circ Res. 2014;115(1):55–67.
Zouggari Y, Ait-Oufella H, Bonnin P, Simon T, Sage AP, Guérin C, et al. B lymphocytes trigger monocyte mobilization and impair heart function after acute myocardial infarction. Nat Med. 2013;19(10):1273–80.
Panizzi P, Swirski FK, Figueiredo JL, Waterman P, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, et al. Impaired infarct healing in atherosclerotic mice with Ly-6C(hi) monocytosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(15):1629–38.
Lee WW, Marinelli B, van der Laan AM, Sena BF, Gorbatov R, Leuschner F, et al. PET/MRI of inflammation in myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2):153–63.
Funding
We would like to thank the National Institutes of Health grant R01 HL134830-01 (PKN) for funding support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: It contained mistakes in the abbreviations and body of the text. Full information regarding corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction article for this article.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Molecular Imaging
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bakerman, I., Wardak, M. & Nguyen, P.K. Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Ischemic Heart Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 11, 13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-018-9452-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-018-9452-6