Skip to main content
Log in

The Aeterna Urbs Geomorphological Heritage (Rome, Italy)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The largest European cities are characterised by millennia of urbanisation. ‘Man-made layering’ over time has modified the original natural setting on which these cities have developed, but an expert eye can often still recognise the ancient geomorphological features of the landscape. We show an example of the identification of the original geomorphological characteristics of the landscape over which the city centre of Rome developed, by means of a geomorphological survey conducted in this urban environment. The aim of the analysis is the enhancement of geotourism in the city centre, by describing the palaeogeography of ancient Rome through the landforms that are still visible. The geomorphological survey led to the identification of two geomorphosites. We developed an evaluation model of the Geotourist Value of a Site (VSG index), which consists of the quantification of five fundamental attributes for a geosite, characterizing its scientific and geotourist interests. The VSG index produces an order of priority for geosites for their enhancement. These results are transferred to the proposal for a geotourist itinerary, along which the selected geosites are joined and related to the historical and cultural features of the city. The itinerary is also represented on a geotourist map, created through the union of scientific and popularised electronic devices. The major outcome of this study is to supplement a proposal for the developing the historical and cultural tourism of the Aeterna Urbs combined with its natural environment features, highlighting the importance of the close connection between these themes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascani F, Bozzano F, Buccellato A, Del Monte M, Matteucci R, Vergari F (2008) Evoluzione del paesaggio e antiche vie di drenaggio nell’area de ‘il Castellaccio’ (Roma) da indagini geologiche, geomorfologiche e archeologiche. Geol Romana 41:93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerici E (1911) Una trivellazione eseguita nel Tevere in Roma al Ponte Fabricio. Rendiconti Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma, In, pp. 922–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Coarelli F (2001) Roma. Guide Archeologiche Laterza, Laterza, Roma

  • Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (2009) Methods for mapping geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Munchen, Pfeil Verlag, pp. 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis D’ossat G (1944) L’isola Tiberina è di Origine alluvionale? Bol Soc Geogr Ital Ser 7 9(3):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rita D, Funiciello R, Rosa C (1992) Volcanic activity and drainage network evolution of the Alban Hill area (Rome, Italy). Acta Volcanica 2:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rita D, Faccenna C, Funiciello R, Rosa C (1995) Stratigraphy and volcano-tectonic. In: Trigila R (ed) The volcano of the Alban Hills. Tipografia SGS, Roma, pp. 33–72

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rita D, Giampaolo C (2005) Local volcanic buildings stones used in the construction of ancient Rome. In: Balmuth M, Chester D, Johnston P (eds) Cultural responses to volcanic landscape: the Mediterranean and beyond. Archeological Institute of America, Boston, pp. 165–185

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rita D, Fabbri M (2009) The Rupe Tarpea: the role of the geology in one of the most important monuments of Rome. Mem Descrittive Carta Geol d’Italia 87:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Lama EA, de La Corte BD, Martins L, da Gloria Motta Garcia M (2014) Urban geotourism and the Old Centre of São Paulo City. Braz Geoheritage. doi:10.1007/s12371-014-0119-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte M, Fredi P, Pica A, Vergari F (2013) Geosites within Rome city center (Italy): a mixture of cultural and geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Dinamamica Quaternaria 36:241–257. doi:10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.20

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Marra F, Pantani G (2002) Caratteri morfostrutturali del settore in riva destra del Fiume Tevere nell’area urbana di Roma. Geol Romana 36:105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK (2008) The emergence of geotourism and geoparks. J Tour 9(2):227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK (2010) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage. doi:10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) (2010) Global geotourism perspectives. Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattori C, Mancinella D (2010) La Conservazione del Patrimonio Geologico del Lazio. Materiali, modelli, esperienze. Edizioni ARP Agenzia Regionale Parchi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Funiciello R, Corazza A, Marra F (1995) Caratteri geologico stratigrafici della città di Roma. Carta dello spessore dei terreni di riporto. In: Funiciello R (ed) Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d’Italia, 50: tav. 13

  • Garavaglia V, Pelfini M (2011) Glacial geomorphosites and related landforms: a proposal for dendrogeomorphological approach and educational trails. Geoheritage 3:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiraldi L (2011) Geomatics application for evaluation and exploitation of geomorphosites in Piemonte region. PhD Thesis, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia

  • Ghiraldi L, Coratza P, De Biaggi E, Giardino M, Marchetti M, Perotti L (2009) Enhancing the knowledge and the exploitation of sites with a geotouristic value: a Web-GIS application for the Middle Tanaro Valley (Cuneo Province, Italy). 6th European Congress of Regional geoscientific cartography and information system, Munich, 2: 254–256

  • Ghiraldi L, Coratza P, Marchetti M (2010) GIS and geomatics application for the evaluation and exploitation of Piemonte geomorphosites. In: Regolini-Bissig G, Reynard E.(Eds.), Mapping Geoheritage, Lausanne Institute de geògraphie, 35: 97–113

  • Gregori L, Melelli L (2005) Geotourism & geomorphosites: the G.I.S. solution. Il Quaternario Ital J Quat Sci 18(1):283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley D (1996) Urban geology and the national curriculum. In: Bennett MR, Doyle P, Larwood JG, Prosser CD (eds) Geology on your doorstep. The Geological Society, Bath, pp. 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiken G, Funiciello R, De Rita D (2007) The Seven Hills of Rome: a geological tour of the Eternal City. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1996) Geotourism or can tourists become casual rock hounds. In: Bennett MR, Doyle P, Larwood JG, Prosser CD (eds) Geology on your doorstep. The Geological Society, Bath, pp. 207–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2012) 3G’s for modern geotourism. Geoheritage 4:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchesi S, Giardino M (2015) Historical archives data for the reconstruction of geomorphological modifications in the urban area of Turin (NW Italy). In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol. 8. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 447–452. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46

    Google Scholar 

  • Magagna A, Ferrero E, Giardino M, Lozar F, Perotti L (2012) A selection of geological tours for promoting the Italian geological heritage in the secondary schools”. Geoheritage. doi:10.1007/s12371-013-0087-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin S (2012) Valoriser le geopatrimonie par la médiation indirecte et la visualisation des object géomorphologiques. PhD Thesis, University of Lausanne

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piacentini T, Castaldini D, Coratza P, Farabollini P, MiccadeiI E (2011) Geotourism: some examples from in the northern-central Italy. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 4(2):240–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica A (2014) Metodi per la valorizzazione del patrimonio geologico, dal rilevamento geomorfologico all’itinerario geoturistico. Applicazioni in ambiente urbano e naturale. PhD Thesis, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”

  • Pinza G (1925) Introduzione geomorfologica alla storia della Civiltà Latina dalle origini al V sec. a.C.. Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia, Roma, 45 pp

  • Poole JS, Higgs J, Harris KE, Birch JL (2010) London’s geodiversity action plan 2009–2013. Consultation Draft. Co-ordinated by Capita Symonds with assistance from the London Geodiversity Partnership

  • Poretti G, Borghi A, D’Atri A, Dino GA, Fernando S, Groppo C, Martire L, Accattino E, Favero Longo SE, Piervittori R, Rolfo F (2015) The stone bridges on the Po River at Turin (NW Italy): a scientific dissemination approach for the development of urban geological heritage. In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol. 8. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 207–211. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing the tourist promotion and use of geomorphological sites. Geomorphol Relief, Processus, Environ 3:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puliga D, Panichi S (2012) Roma. Monumenti, miti, storia della città eterna. Einaudi-Mondadori Printing SpA, Cles

    Google Scholar 

  • Regolini (2012) Cartographier les géomorphosites. Objectifs, publics et propositions méthodologiques. Geovision, 38. Université, Institut de Géographie, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Regolini-Bissig G, Reynard E (2010) Mapping geoheritage. Géovisions, 35. Lausanne, Université, Institut de Géographie

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2004) Géotopes, géo (morpho) site set paysages géomorphologiques. In: Reynard E, Pralong JP (eds) Paysage Géomorphologiques, vol. 27. Institut de Géographie, Travaux et Reserches, Lausanne, pp. 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv Jg 62(3):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Berrebi Y (2008) Percorsi geodidattici e aspettative del pubblico. In : Atti del 3° Congresso Nazionale di Geologia e Turismo, Bologna, 1–3 Marzo 2007, pp 15–21

  • Reynard E, Kaiser C, Martin S, Regolini G (2015) An application for geosciences. Communication by smartphones and tablets. In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 8. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 265–268. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson E (1982) A geological walk around the City of London—royal exchange to Aldgate. Proc Geol Assoc 93:225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson E (1984) London: illustrated geological walks. Scottish Academic Press, v.1

  • Robinson E (1985) London: illustrated geological walks. Scottish Academic Press, v.2

  • Robinson E, Bishop C (1980) Geological walks around St. Paul’s. Proc Geol Assoc 91:241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ML, Machado CR, Freire E (2011) Geotourism routes in urban areas: a preliminary approach to the Lisbon geoheritage survey. Geo J Tour Geosites 8(2):281–294 ISSN 2065-0817, E-ISSN 2065-1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventriglia U (2002) Geologia del Territorio del Comune di Roma. Casa Editrice Cerbone s.r.l., Afragola (Na)

  • Wrede V, Mugge-Bartolovic V (2012) GeoRoute Rubre-Anetwork of geotrails in the Rubr Area National Geopark, Germany. Geoheritage 4(1-2):109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pica, A., Vergari, F., Fredi, P. et al. The Aeterna Urbs Geomorphological Heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 8, 31–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3

Keywords

Navigation