EditorialStriving for consistency in the measurement of LVEF and left ventricular volume
Section snippets
Disclosure
The authors Patrycja Galazka and Steven Port have no conflicts to disclose in reference to this work.
References (14)
- et al.
Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: Strengths and pitfalls
J Nucl Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: The RUBY-10 study
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
(2014) - et al.
Cardiac PET/CT and prognosis
Cardiovasc Innov Appl
(2016) - et al.
Measuring left ventricular ejection fraction-techniques and potential pitfalls
Eur Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT
J Nucl Med
(2005) - et al.
Comparison of QGS, 4DM, and MIMcardiac for the evaluation of left ventricular functional parameters for gated myocardial SPECT
J Nucl Med
(2012) - et al.
Comparison of automated quantitative myocardial perfusion utilizing three software packages
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (1)
Impaired coronary flow reserve in patients with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction at rest
2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
See related article, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01698-9.
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by ELSEVIER INC. All rights reserved. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.