Editorial
Striving for consistency in the measurement of LVEF and left ventricular volume

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01847-0Get rights and content

Section snippets

Disclosure

The authors Patrycja Galazka and Steven Port have no conflicts to disclose in reference to this work.

References (14)

  • SlomkaP et al.

    Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: Strengths and pitfalls

    J Nucl Cardiol

    (2012)
  • NesterovSV et al.

    Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: The RUBY-10 study

    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2014)
  • GalazkaP et al.

    Cardiac PET/CT and prognosis

    Cardiovasc Innov Appl

    (2016)
  • FoleyT et al.

    Measuring left ventricular ejection fraction-techniques and potential pitfalls

    Eur Cardiol

    (2012)
  • SchaeferWM et al.

    Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT

    J Nucl Med

    (2005)
  • Pirozzi Sm NelsonA et al.

    Comparison of QGS, 4DM, and MIMcardiac for the evaluation of left ventricular functional parameters for gated myocardial SPECT

    J Nucl Med

    (2012)
  • IqbalF et al.

    Comparison of automated quantitative myocardial perfusion utilizing three software packages

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (1)

See related article, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01698-9.

View full text
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by ELSEVIER INC. All rights reserved. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.