Skip to main content
Log in

A case of pancreatic mixed acinar–neuroendocrine carcinoma successfully diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixed acinar–neuroendocrine carcinoma (MAEC) of the pancreas is a rare entity, and obtaining a preoperative diagnosis is difficult. We report a case of pancreatic MAEC successfully diagnosed with EUS-FNA. The case was a 72-year-old male with upper abdominal pain. Abdominal CT showed an irregular, hypovascular tumor of pancreatic tail. EUS-FNA was performed using a 22G needle. Immunostaining revealed positive results for the acinar marker trypsin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The possibility for MAEC was considered. He underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Immunohistochemical examination of the tumor cells showed a wide range of positivity for bcl-10 and trypsin as well as for chromogranin A and synaptophysin, but negative results for CA19-9 and AFP. Considering that ≥ 30% tumors were positive for both acinar and neuroendocrine markers, the patient was diagnosed with MAEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitagami H, Kondo S, Hirano S, et al. Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas clinical analysis of 115 patients from Pancreatic Cancer Registry of Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2007;35:42–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, et al. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IRAC Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iemoto T, Sawa H, Hayashi H, et al. A case of pancreatic mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma suggested by preoperative ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshonokuma. 2014;111:1609–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ogawa T, Isaji S, Yabana T. A case of mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas discovered in an asymptomatic subject. J Pancreatol. 2000;27:249–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skacel M, Ormsby AH, Petras RE, et al. Immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of acinar and endocrine pancreatic neoplasms. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000;8:203–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mizuno N, Naruse S, Kitagawa M, et al. Insulinoma with subsequent association of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Intern Med. 2001;40:386–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohike N, Kosmahl M, Klöppel G. Mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas. A clinicopathological study and comparison with acinar-cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2004;445:231–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imaoka H, Amano Y, Moriyama I, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma: a case report. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2659–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishii T, Amano R, Nakao S, et al. A case of liver metastasis of mixed acinar–endocrine Carcinoma treated with various loco-regional cancer therapies. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2008;35:2126–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kyriazi MA, Arkadopoulos N, Stafyla VK, et al. Mixed acinarendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: a case report and review of the literature. Cases J. 2009;2:6481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung WJ, Byun JH, Lee SS, et al. Imaging findings in a case of mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11:378–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi S, Asakura T, Ohike N, et al. Mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with intraductal growth into the main pancreatic duct: report of a case. Surg Today. 2010;40:380–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soubra A, Faraj W, Saab J, et al. Peri-ampullary mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma. Rare Tumors. 2011;3:e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee L, Bajor-Dattilo EB, Das K. Metastatic mixed acinar–neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas to the liver: a cytopathology case report with review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan PS, Clebanoff JL, Hirschowitz SL. Hints to the diagnosis of mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma on pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: avoiding a potential diagnostic pitfall. Acta Cytol. 2013;57:296–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogbonna OH, Garcon MC, Syrigos KN, et al. Mixed acinarneuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with neuroendocrine predominance. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:705092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu R, Jih L, Zhai J, et al. Mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: new clinical and pathological features in a contemporary series. Pancreas. 2013;42:429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanemasa Y, Kamisawa T, Tabata T, et al. Mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas treated with S-1. Clon J Gastroenterol. 2013;6:459–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z, Dong C, Wang C, et al. Mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of pancreas: a case report and brief review of the literature. OncoTargets and Therapy. 2015;8:1633–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugimoto M, Hines OJ, Dawson DW, et al. Preoperative treatment with FOLFIRINOX and successful resection for a patient with mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2017;46:e32–e3434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hara T, Yoshiyuki F, Takahashi H, et al. Metastatic mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas treated with a multidisciplinary approach: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2017;3:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yokode M, Itai R, Yamashita Y. A case report of mixed acinar–endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas treated with S-1 chemotherapy. Medicine. 2017;96(45):e8534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alexander M, Ninu S, Michael J, et al. Pancreatic mixed acinar–neuroendocrine carcinoma, a unique diagnostic challenge on FNA cytology: a small series of two cases with literature review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46:971–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eusebi LH, Thorburn D, Toumpanakis C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration vs fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7:E1393–E13991399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitaka Niiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

T Fumitaka Niiya, Yuichi Takano, Tetsushi Azami, Takahiro Kobayashi, Naotaka Maruoka, Tetsuji Wakabayashi, Kenichi Matsuo, Kuniya Tanaka, Tomoko Norose, Nobuyuki Ohike, Masatsugu Nagahama declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures followed have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niiya, F., Takano, Y., Azami, T. et al. A case of pancreatic mixed acinar–neuroendocrine carcinoma successfully diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Clin J Gastroenterol 13, 951–958 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-020-01136-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-020-01136-1

Keywords

Navigation