Abstract
Background
de Quervain’s disease is an inadequacy into the first extensor compartment of wrist between the osteofibrous tunnel and the tendons. This mechanical conflict generates a tenosynovitis of the extensor pollicis brevis and the abductor pollicis longus tendons in first dorsal extensor compartment of the wrist.
Aim
(1) To compare the clinical results obtained by longitudinal and transverse incisions and (2) the implication of clinical results in Indian population.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted at Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal, Haryana. The inclusion criteria were positive Finkelstein’s test and no response to non-surgical treatment for 6 weeks. Forty-eight patients with de Quervain’s disease who did not respond to conservative treatment were operated with two different incisions. The patients were followed at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months to compare the surgical outcomes.
Results
During a three-month follow-up, a significant difference was shown between the two methods (p = 0.0001). Results of surgical treatment with longitudinal incision were better (only one hypertrophic scar), but there were 12 postoperative complications with transverse incision. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the hypertrophic scar. In transverse incision group, out of five patients, four patients who developed hypertrophic scar have poor score according to VAS.
Conclusion
Overall, longitudinal incision should be used for surgical treatment for de Quervain’s disease due to lower risk of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleqado RB, Meals RA (1979) An unusual complication following surgical treatment of de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Surg Am 4(2):185–611
Bouras Y, EI Andaloussi Y, Zaouari T, Touil N, Fnini S, Chikhaoui N, Largab A (2010) Surgical treatment in De Quervain’s tenosynovitis About 20 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 55(1):42–45
Duncan JAL, Bond JS, Mason T et al (2006) Visual Analogue Scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality? PRS 118(4):909–918
Faithful DK, Lamb DW (1971) de Quervain’s disease—A clinical review. Hand 3:23–30
Gousheh J, Yavari M, Arasteh E (2009) Division of the first dorsal compartment of the hand into two separated canals: rule or exception? Arch Iran Med 12(1):52–54
Harvey FJ, Harvey PM, Horsley MW (1990) De Quervain’s disease: surgical or nonsurgical treatment. J Hand Surg Am 15(1):83–87
Hanlon DP, Luellen JR (1999) Intersection syndrome : a case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med 17(6):969–971
Ilyas AM, Ast M, Schaffer AA, Thoder J (2007) De quervain tenosynovitis of the wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(12):757–764
Leslie WD (2006) The scintigraphic appearance of de Quervain tenosynovitis. Clin Nucl Med 10:602–604
Le Viet D, Lantieri L, De Quervain’s tenosynovitis (1992) Transversal scar and fixation of the capsular flap. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 78(2):101–106
Scheller A, Schuh R, Honle W, Schuh A (2009) Long-term results of surgical release of de Quervain’s stenosing tenosynovitis. Int Orthop 33(5):1301–1303
Weiss AP, Akelman E, Tabatabai M (1994) Treatment of de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Surg Am 19(4):595–598
Wetterkamp D, Rieger H, Brug E (1997) 100 years tendovaginitis stenosans de Quervain—review of the literature and personal results. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 29(4):214–217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest and funding was received on this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, K. Outcome of longitudinal versus transverse incision in de Quervain’s disease and its implications in Indian population. Musculoskelet Surg 100, 49–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0388-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0388-6