Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this retrospective study was to report clinical results of a selective population undergone to arthroscopic functional repair of massive, contracted, immobile rotator cuff tears.
Methods
From 2005 to 2009, 311 patients with rotator cuff tears were treated at our institution. Of them, 26 shoulders in 25 patients with a mean age of 64 years that presented a massive, contracted immobile tear repaired using an interval slide technique, were included in this study.
Results
The mean postoperative follow-up period was 39 months (range 19–70 months). The mean postoperative disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and simple shoulder test (SST) score were, respectively, 20.91 and 8.8 (range DASH: 0.83–59.1; range SST: 2–12). Based on single assessment numeric evaluation score, the outcome of surgery was satisfactory with a mean of 76 % (range 0–100 %). The residual level of pain was low, as reported by a final mean visual analog scale score of 1.8 (range 0–8). The mean postoperative range of motion was 157.5° in forward elevation (range 90°–180°) and 55.3° in extra rotation (range 0°–90°). Eleven patients reached mid-back, in 7, the lower back and in 8 cases, upper back.
Conclusion
Arthroscopic functional repair could be considered an appropriate treatment option in case of massive, contracted and immobile cuff tears. This treatment can provide improvement in pain and function that positively affects patients’ quality of life without precluding other, more invasive, eventually consequent solutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burkhart SS (1997) Partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears: the evolution of a concept. Orthop Clin North Am 28(1):125–132
Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86
Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:599–605
Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuffruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop 304:78–83
Tauro JC (2004) Arthroscopic repair of large rotator cuff tears using the interval slide technique. Arthroscopy 20(1):13–21
Carter CW, Levine WN, Kleweno CP, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS (2008) Assessment of shoulder range of motion: introduction of a novel patient self-assessment tool. Arthroscopy 24(6):712–717
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The upper extremity collaborative group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608
Lippit SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA (1993) A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ (eds) The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 501–518
Langley GB, Sheppeard H (1985) The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int 5(4):145–148
Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC (1999) Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 27(2):214–221
Deering SJ, Mair SD, Lattermann C (2012) Treatment options for chronic retracted degenerative rotator cuff tears. Med Sport Sci. 57:153–167
Porcellini G, Castagna A, Cesari E, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Paladini P (2011) Partial repair of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears: clinical and radiographic evaluations at long-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(7):1170–1177
Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ et al (1994) Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10:363–370
Burkhart SS (2001) Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:107–118
Berth A, Neumann W, Awiszus F, Pap G (2010) Massive rotator cuff tears: functional outcome after debridement or arthroscopic partial repair. J Orthop Traumatol 11(1):13–20
Duralde XA, Bair B (2005) Massive rotator cuff tears: the result of partial rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(2):121–127
Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic repair of massive, contracted, immobile rotator cuff tears using single and double interval slides: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 20(1):22–33
Burkhart SS (1994) Reconciling the paradox of rotator cuff repair versus debridement: a unified biomechanical rationale for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10:4–19
Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M (1993) Arthroscopic treatment of full thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 9:195–200
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arrigoni, P., Fossati, C., Zottarelli, L. et al. Functional repair in massive immobile rotator cuff tears leads to satisfactory quality of living: results at 3-year follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg 97 (Suppl 1), 73–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0252-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0252-5