Skip to main content
Log in

The stribeck curve in cold flat rolling

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cold flat rolling of lubricated steel strips was studied. The three-component system of rolling - the mill, the rolled strip and their interface - was analyzed using a two-step mathematical model, a 1D model and flat rolling experiments. The utilized experimental data have been taken from McConnell and Lenard [1]. The objective of the study was the examination of the interactions of the three components and the development of the Stribeck curve. In the first part of the work, a two-dimensional finite element model was used in which the elastic deformation of the work roll and the elastic–plastic deformation of the strip were considered. Special attention was paid to the events at the lubricated interface where an upgraded version of Levanov’s model was utilized. The model was developed to analyze the local variables at the roll-strip interface. The parameters of the model were determined in an iterative manner, minimizing the differences of the measured and computed roll force and torque. Thus, the relative velocity between the roll and the strip, the roll pressure, the interfacial shear stress and the temperature were obtained. The effect of the temperature on the material parameters of the constitutive equations was also taken into account. Another model was then employed to consider the effects of the local variables on the lubricant’s viscosity. These were then used to obtain the local values of the Sommerfeld number, which in turn led to its average value and to the traditional shape of the Stribeck curve. Further, a simple 1D model of the flat rolling process was also tested for its ability to lead to the Stribeck curve. It was concluded that while both advanced and simple models allowed the development of the curve, removing the simplifying assumptions yielded a more reliable plot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McConnell C, Lenard JG (2000) Friction in cold rolling of a low carbon steel with lubricants. J Mater Process Technol 99:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schey JA (2000) Introduction to manufacturing processes. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orowan E (1943) The calculation of the roll pressure in hot and cold flat rolling. Proc I Mech E 150:140–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prakash RS, Dixit PM, Lal GK (1995) Steady-state plane-strain cold rolling of a strain-hardening material. J Mater Process Technol 52:338–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avitzur B (1968) Metal forming: processes and analysis 63–66

  6. Dıxıt US, Dıxıt PM (1997) Finite-element analysis of flat rolling with inclusion of anisotropy. Int J Mech Sci 39(11):1237–1255

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenard JG (2013) Primer on flat rolling. 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu C, Hartley P, Strugess CEN, Rowe GW (1985) Elastic–plastic finite-element modelling of cold rolling of strip. Int J Mech Sci 27:531–541

  9. Li G, Kobayashi S (1982) Rigid-plastic finite-element analysis of plane strain rolling. ASME J Eng Ind 104:33–64

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dvorkin EN, Goldschmit MB, Cavaliere MA, Amenta PM, Marini O, Stroppiana W (1997) 2D finite element parametric studies of the flat-rollingprocess. J Mater Process Technol 68:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang ZY, Tieu AK, Zhang XM, Lu C, Sun WH (2003) Finite element simulation of cold rolling of thin strip. J Mater Process Technol 140:542–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Salehi FAK, Firbank TC, Lancaster PG (1973) An experimental determination of the roll pressure distribution in cold rolling. Int J Mech Sci 15:693–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixit US, Dixit PM (1996) A finite element analysis of flat rolling and application of fuzzy set theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(8):947–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wanheim T, Bay N (1978) A model for friction in metal forming processes. Ann CIRP 27:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hitchcock JH (1935) Roll neck bearings. App I. ASME, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shida S, Awazuhara H (1973) Rolling load and torque in cold rolling. Jpn Soc Technol Plast 14:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gudur PP, Dixit US (2008) A neural network-assisted finite element analysis of cold flat rolling. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong S, Rodrigues JMC, Martins PAF (1999) Three-dimensional simulation of flat rolling through a combined finite element-boundary element approach. Finite Elem Anal Des 32:221–233

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiong S, Rodrigues JMC, Martins PAF (1999) Simulation of plane strain rolling through a combined finite element boundary element approach. J Mater Process Technol 96:173–181

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang SH, Zhang GL, Liu JS, Li CS, Mei RB (2010) A fast rigid-plastic finite element method for online application in strip rolling. Finite Elem Anal Des 46:1146–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Muniz AR (2007) Non-Linear Finite Element Method Simulation and Modelling of the Cold and Hot Rolling Processes. M.Sc. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

  22. Bézi ZG, Krállics G, Szűcs M (2012) Lemezhengerlés kísérleti vizsgálata és végeselemes modellezése, (in Hugarian). Anyagmérnöki Tudomány 37:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stribeck R (1902) Die wesentlichen Eigenschaften der Gleit- und Rollenlager. Zeit des VDI 46

  24. Gümbel A (1914) Das problem der Lagerreibung. Berliner Bezirksvereines deutscher 22 Ingenieure 6:109–120

  25. Monfort G, Defourny J (1990) Tribological factors in the stamping of coated and uncoated steel sheets. Proc. 17th IDDRG Congress 197–205

  26. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings, 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, Hague, pp 541–547

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marc® (2013) Volume a: theory and user ınformation. 603–605

  28. Levanov AN (1997) Improvement of metal forming processes by means of useful effects of plastic friction. J Mater Process Technol 72:314–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roychoudhury R, Lenard JG (1984) A mathematical model for cold rolling – experimental substantiation. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Techn. Plast, Tokyo, pp 1138–1143

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lenard JG (1991) Measurements of friction in cold flat rolling. J Mater Shap Technol 9:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sa C-Y, Wilson WRD (1994) Full film lubrication in strip rolling. ASME J Tribol 116:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Szucs.

Appendix: Models and formula mentioned in introduction

Appendix: Models and formula mentioned in introduction

The friction factor

is given as the ratio of the interfacial shear stress (τ) and the yield strength (k) in pure shear of the softer material in the contact:

$$ \begin{array}{ll}m=\tau /k\hfill & 0\le m\le 1\hfill \end{array} $$
(9)

For the perfect lubrication m = 0 and the sticking conditions occur for m = 1.

Amonton and Coulomb frictional model

The friction stress (τ) is directly proportional to local normal pressure p.

$$ \tau =\mu p $$
(10)

Wahnheim-Bay’s frictional model

The general frictional model is based on the slip-line theory and the nominal friction stress (τ n ) is given by the following:

$$ {\tau}_n=m\alpha k $$
(11)

where m is the friction factor, α is the ratio between real and apparent area of contact. The model indicates that Amonton Coulomb’s law is valid whereas the friction stress approaches a constant value at high normal pressures.

Hitchkock’s formula

The modified roll radius (R’) caused by elastic deformation can be expressed by Hitchcock’s formula:

$$ {R}^{\prime }=R\left[1+\frac{16\left(1-{v}^2\right)}{\pi E}\frac{F_r}{b\varDelta h}\right] $$
(12)

where R is the radius of the unloaded work roll, b is the width of rolled strip, Δh = h 0 -h 1 and h 0 , h 1 are the initial and final thickness of strip and F r is the rolling force.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szucs, M., Krallics, G. & Lenard, J.G. The stribeck curve in cold flat rolling. Int J Mater Form 10, 99–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1263-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1263-6

Keywords

Navigation