Abstract
Quality indicators are tools for continuous improvement to enable the blood center to achieve its standards of the highest quality. Hence, they have to be established and monitored regularly for which NABH (National Accreditation Board for Hospitals) accreditation should be sought for. This study was undertaken to assess the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) through clinical audit quality control study of ten parameters, with a goal to improve and meet the benchmark as defined by NABH. All 10 Key Performance Indicators defined by NABH were analysed prospectively in a tertiary care blood centre of southern India. Parameters were compared to that of bench mark standards. Root cause analysis of all non-conformance parameters were done. Problem were identified and action taken to achieve KPI benchmarks in all deviations. Out of the ten KPI’s which were studied, more than 50% meet the quality standards. The ones that did not meet the bench mark were TTI-HIV% which was 0.44%, TTI-Syphilis (RPR)% 0.26%, Number of units received back for discarding 5.96%, PRBC wastage% (on-shelf) was 2.11%, FFP, Cryoprecipitate wastage % (on-shelf) was 2.71%, the mean TAT for crossmatch of emergency PRBC blood was 18.3 min, 41.11% of FFP QC failure failed, Delay in transfusion time beyond 30 min after issue was 19.14%, Donor Deferral rate was 16.36% and TTI Outliers% No. of deviations beyond ± 2SD for HBsAg, HCV, HIV were 14.43%, 12.59% and17.73% respectively. Present study has helped to understand the flaws and problems faced by a tertiary care blood center in sustaining quality. It also actively captured and analysed multiple cross sections of non-conformances.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Letowska M (2009) Patient specific component requirements: ‘right blood, right patient, right time, right place.’ ISBT Sci Ser 4(1):52–55
Gupta A, Gupta C (2016) Role of National Accreditation Board of Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH) core indicators monitoring in quality and safety of blood transfusion. Asian J Transfus Sci 10(1):37
Hindawi S (2009) Systems for accreditation in blood transfusion services. ISBT Sci Ser 4(1):14–17
NABH Accreditation Standards for Blood Bank, 3rd edn. New Delhi, India, June 2016, pp 130–36
Cheema AS, Srivastava S, Srivastava PK, Murthy BK (2015) A standard compliant blood bank management system with enforcing mechanism. In: 2015 international conference on computing, communication and security (ICCCS) 2015 Dec 4, pp 1–7. IEEE
Anyaegbu CC (2011) Quality indicators in transfusion medicine: the building blocks. ISBT Sci Ser 6(1):35–45
Varshney L, Gupta S, Borkar DB (2017) Quality indicators: performance tools of blood transfusion service. J Evol Med Dent Sci 6(90):6348–6352
Jain R, Aggarwal P, Gupta GN (2012) Need for nucleic acid testing in countries with high prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections. Int Sch Res Not. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/718671
Kanani AN, Vachhani JH, Dholakiya SK, Upadhyay SB (2017) Analysis on discard of blood and its products with suggested possible strategies to reduce its occurrence in a blood bank of tertiary care hospital in Western India. Glob J Transfus Med 2(2):130
Sharma M, Arora S, Malhotra A (2018) Analysis of turnaround time for issuance of blood products in emergency: a prospective study in a tertiary care centre in Jammu. J Med sci Clin Res 6(9):11
Patel SN, Ranapurwala M, Shah M (2016) Quality control of blood components-a step towards efficient supply of blood products. Int J Adv Res 4(4):570–572
Sapkota A, Poudel S, Sedhain A, Khatiwada N (2018) Blood transfusion practice among healthcare personnel in Nepal: an observational study. J Blood Transfus. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6190859
Sundar P, Sangeetha SK, Seema DM, Marimuthu P, Shivanna N (2010) Pre-donation deferral of blood donors in South Indian set-up: an analysis. Asian J Transfus Sci 4(2):112
Tondon R, Verma A, Pandey P, Chaudhary R (2009) Quality evaluation of four hemoglobin screening methods in a blood donor setting along with their comparative cost analysis in an Indian scenario. Asian J Transfus Sci 3(2):66
James V, Jones KF, Turner EM, Sokol RJ (2003) Statistical analysis of inappropriate results from current Hb screening methods for blood donors. Transfusion 43(3):400–404
Radtke H, Polat G, Kalus U, Salama A, Kiesewetter H (2005) Hemoglobin screening in prospective blood donors: comparison of different blood samples and different quantitative methods. Transfus Apheresis Sci 33(1):31–35
Sawant RB, Bharucha ZS, Rajadhyaksha SB (2007) Evaluation of hemoglobin of blood donors deferred by the copper sulphate method for hemoglobin estimation. Transfus Apheresis Sci 36(2):143–148
Basavarajegowda A (2017) Whole blood donor deferral causes in a tertiary care teaching hospital blood bank from south India. Hematol Transfus Int J 5(2):00116
Gaajre AV, Khatib Y, Patel R, Oraon AP (2016) Evaluation of the causes of deferral among blood donors: a retrospective study. Ann Pathol Lab Med 3(3):A244-248
Kandasamy D, Shastry S, Chenna D, Mohan G (2020) Blood donor deferral analysis in relation to the screening process: a single-center study from southern India with emphasis on high hemoglobin prevalence. J Blood Med 11:327
Sáez-Alquezar A, Albajar-Viñas P, Guimarães AV, Corrêa JA (2015) Quality control in screening for infectious diseases at blood banks. Rationale and methodology. EJIFCC 26(4):278
Dubey A, Sonker A (2021) Implementation of internal quality control program for monitoring of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay performance at a blood center. Asian J Transfus Sci 15(1):21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gnanaraj, J., Kulkarni, R.G., Sahoo, D. et al. Assessment of the Key Performance Indicator Proposed by NABH in the Blood Centre of a Tertiary Health Care Hospital in Southern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 39, 308–316 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01563-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01563-9