Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mutation Analysis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patient in Chronic Phase on Imatinib Having Delayed Achievement of Milestones or Loss of Response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI’s) are currently the drug of choice for management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Imatinib is the most commonly used first line TKI in India. Mutations leading to resistance to imatinib are the most common cause for imatinib failure. We studied pattern of kinase domain mutations in 40 patients of CML who either lost their response or did not achieve it in defined timepoints. Loss of molecular response was the most common indication for asking mutation analysis. Sixteen patients were found to have detectable mutations. M351T was the most common tyrosine kinase mutation followed by Y253H and H396R. Two patients had 2 mutations simultaneously. M351T is the most common mutation in our patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bansal S, Prabhash K, Parikh P (2013) Chronic myeloid leukemia data from India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 34(3):154–158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee SJ (2000) Chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol 111:993–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Druker B, Lydon N (2000) Lessons learned from the development of an Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Invest 105:3–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MH, Williams G, Johnson JR et al (2002) Approval summary for imatinib mesylate capsules in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 8:935–942

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Jabbour E et al (2012) Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single institution historical experience. Blood 119(9):1981–1987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kantarjian H, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Souza C, Flinn I, Stenke L et al (2011) Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol 12:841–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hochhaus A, O’Brien S, Guilhot F, Druker B, Branford S, Foroni L et al (2009) Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 23:1054–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhamidipati PK, Kantarjian H, Cortes J et al (2013) Management of imatinib resistant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol 4(2):103–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Nicolini FE, Franz G, Lange T, Saglio G et al (2011) BCR–ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European leukemiaNet. Blood 118(5):1208–1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elias MH, Baba AA, Azian H et al (2014) BCR–ABL kinase domain mutations, including 2 novel mutations in imatinib resistant Malaysian chronic myeloid leukemia patients—frequency and clinical outcome. Leuk Res 38(4):454–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soverini S, Colarossi S, Gnani A, Rosti G, Castagnetti F, Poerio A et al (2006) Contribution of ABL kinase domain mutations in imatinib resistance in different subsets of Philadelphia positive patients: by the GIMEMA working party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 12:7374–7379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Parkinson I, Grigg A, Szer J et al (2003) Detection of BCR–ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate binding loop(p-loop) are associated with poor prognosis. Blood 102:276–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Babu G (2013) Report of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia Kidwai memorial institute of oncology Bangalore over 15 years. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 34(3):196–198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Prabhash K, Vora T, Chadyalpatil NS et al (2009) Patterns of imatinib resistance mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on imatinib at the time of loss of response to the drug in Asian Indian subjects. J Clin Oncol 27:7079

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava S, Dutta S (2013) Imatinib mesylate resistance and mutations: an Indian experience. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 34(3):213–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki’s Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained for all individuals participating in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathi, A.K., Verma, S.P. & Kumar, N. Mutation Analysis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patient in Chronic Phase on Imatinib Having Delayed Achievement of Milestones or Loss of Response. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 33, 316–320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-016-0755-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-016-0755-y

Keywords

Navigation