Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for early postoperative psychological problems in breast cancer patients after axillary lymph node dissection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors related to early postoperative psychological conditions in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node dissection 3 months after the surgery.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 200 consecutive patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer at our hospital. Age, body mass index, surgical side, work, marriage, presence of children, presence of co-resident household members, resection of the pectoralis minor muscle, preoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative hormonal therapy, postoperative radiotherapy, shoulder range of motion, upper limb function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH), and psychological conditions were evaluated. In this study, a Distress and Impact Thermometer was used to classify patients with adjustment disorders, depression, or major depression and suicidal ideation into a group with psychological problems and the remaining patients into a group with no psychological problems.

Results

Logistic regression analysis showed that only DASH was statistically significantly associated with psychological conditions (p < 0.05). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a DASH score of 18 or greater was found to be very specific for predicting psychological conditions.

Conclusions

The observation that somatic symptoms and disability of upper limb function are related to psychological conditions may indicate the importance of postoperative rehabilitation in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Snell L, McCarthy C, Klassen A, Cano S, Rubin L, Hurley K, et al. Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1825–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Derogatis LR. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA. 1983;249:751–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hotopf M, Chidgey J, Addington-Hall J, Ly KL. Depression in advanced disease: a systematic review. Part 1. Prevalence and case finding. Palliat Med. 2002;16:81–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Minagawa H, Uchitomi Y, Yamawaki S, Ishitani K. Psychiatric morbidity in terminally ill cancer patients. A prospective study. Cancer. 1996;78:1131–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Okamura H, Watanabe T, Narabayashi M, Katsumata N, Ando M, Adachi I, et al. Psychological distress following first recurrence of disease in patients with breast cancer: prevalence and risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;61:131–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akechi T, Okamura H, Nishiwaki Y, Uchitomi Y. Psychiatric disorders and associated and predictive factors in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a longitudinal study. Cancer. 2001;92:2609–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10:19–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, Robaye E. Screening for adjustment disorders and major depressive disorders in cancer patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;156:79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Visser MR, Smets EM. Fatigue, depression and quality of life in cancer patients: how are they related? Support Care Cancer. 1998;6:101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2101–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Falagas ME, Zarkadoulia EA, Ioannidou EN, Peppas G, Christodoulou C, Rafailidis PI. The effect of psychosocial factors on breast cancer outcome: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohayon MM, Schatzberg AF. Using chronic pain to predict depressive morbidity in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrill EF, Brewer NT, O’Neill SC, Lillie SE, Dees EC, Carey LA, et al. The interaction of post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress symptoms in predicting depressive symptoms and quality of life. Psychooncology. 2008;17:948–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ollonen P, Lehtonen J, Eskelinen M. Anxiety, depression, and the history of psychiatric symptoms in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio Finland. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:2527–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith EM, Gomm SA, Dickens CM. Assessing the independent contribution to quality of life from anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2003;17:509–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kissane DW, Grabsch B, Love A, Clarke DM, Bloch S, Smith GC. Psychiatric disorder in women with early stage and advanced breast cancer: a comparative analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004;38:320–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Lander S. “Are you depressed?” Screening for depression in the terminally ill. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:674–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Akizuki N, Akechi T, Nakanishi T, Yoshikawa E, Okamura M, Nakano T, et al. Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2003;97:2605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baken DM, Woolley C. Validation of the distress thermometer, impact thermometer and combinations of these in screening for distress. Psychooncology. 2011;20:609–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patrick-Miller LJ, Broccoli TL, Much JK, Levine E. Validation of the Distress Thermometer: a single item screen to detect clinically significant psychological distress in ambulatory oncology patients (Meeting Abstracts). J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:6024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akizuki N, Yamawaki S, Akechi T, Nakano T, Uchitomi Y. Development of an Impact Thermometer for use in combination with the Distress Thermometer as a brief screening tool for adjustment disorders and/or major depression in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2005;29:91–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, et al. Prevalence of depression, anxiety and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:160–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S. The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? Br J Hand Ther. 2001;6:109–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruce J, Williamson E, Lait C, Richmond H, Betteley L, Lall R, et al. Randomised controlled trial of exercise to prevent shoulder problems in women undergoing breast cancer treatment: study protocol for the prevention of shoulder problems trial (UK PROSPER). BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ibrahim M, Muanza T, Smirnow N, Sateren W, Fournier B, Kavan P, et al. Time course of upper limb function and return-to-work post-radiotherapy in young adults with breast cancer: a pilot randomized control trial on effects of targeted exercise program. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:791–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Şener HÖ, Malkoç M, Ergin G, Karadibak D, Yavuzşen T. Effects of clinical pilates exercises on patients developing lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: a randomized clinical trial. J Breast Health. 2017;13:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Gross CP, Ercolano E, Li F, Yao X, et al. Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1104–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Crosbie J, Kilbreath SL, Dylke E, Refshauge KM, Nicholson LL, Beith JM, et al. Effects of mastectomy on shoulder and spinal kinematics during bilateral upper-limb movement. Phys Ther. 2010;90:679–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Little CA, Williams SE, Puzanovova M, Rudzinski ER, Walker LS. Multiple somatic symptoms linked to positive screen for depression in pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44:58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zwaigenbaum L, Szatmari P, Boyle MH, Offord DR. Highly somatizing young adolescents and the risk of depression. Pediatrics. 1999;103:1203–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Broeckel JA, Jacobsen PB, Balducci L, Horton J, Lyman GH. Quality of life after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:141–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cicero V, Lo Coco G, Gullo S, Lo VG. The role of attachment dimensions and perceived social support in predicting adjustment to cancer. Psychooncology. 2009;18:1045–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Zheng Y, Zheng W, Gu K, Chen Z, Lu W, et al. Prevalence of depression and its related factors among Chinese women with breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:1128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rizalar S, Ozbas A, Akyolcu N, Gungor B. Effect of perceived social support on psychosocial adjustment of Turkish patients with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3429–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Özpolat AGY, Ayaz T, Konağ Ö, Özkan A. Attachment style and perceived social support as predictors of biopsychosocial adjustment to cancer. Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all of the patients who participated for their cooperation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YA, EN, and MK contributed to the study conception and design, wrote the manuscript, and analyzed the data. RT, HK, and MH were involved in data collection and processing. KA, SO, and SS have revised critically the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiteru Akezaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Shikoku Cancer Center Ethics Committee approved the study, and written, informed consent was obtained from each participant (Approval no. 2018-45).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akezaki, Y., Nakata, E., Kikuuchi, M. et al. Risk factors for early postoperative psychological problems in breast cancer patients after axillary lymph node dissection. Breast Cancer 27, 284–290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01020-y

Keywords

Navigation